Case Analysis Puran Lal Sah versus State of UP Submitted by – Aseem Agarwal (12PGPIM04) Nitin Gupta (12PGPIM21) Rahul Jain (12PGPIM24) Saumitra Das (12PGPIM28) Nishant Shah (12PGPIM29) Supreme Court of India Puran Lal Sah vs State Of U.P on 21 January‚ 1971 Equivalent citations: 1971 AIR 712‚ 1971 SCR (3) 469 Bench: Reddy‚ P Jaganmohan PETITIONER: PURAN LAL SAH Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF U.P. DATE OF JUDGMENT 21/01/1971 BENCH: REDDY‚ P. JAGANMOHAN BENCH: REDDY
Premium Contract
except according to procedure established by law - Articles 11 and 13 of the Constitution -Administrative practice. The application of a concept of administrative practice can extend State responsibility to cases where the material before court can show that occurrence of the acts complained of can be attributed to the existence of a general situation created or brought about by the negligence and indifference of those in authority. In the instant case if liability is to be imputed to the State
Premium Acts of the Apostles United States Constitution Administrative law
Marquetta Brown Eng 241 J. Zeff Formalist Criticism The poem ‘Waiting oat the curb: Lynwood California‚ 1967 written by Deborah Escobedo is about a young girl named Debbie in Lynwood‚ California who is waiting on a friend at the curb. When first examining the title of the poem‚ I think of waiting on the curb as a sign of prostitution or hitchhiking. They way I imagine the scene of the poem is; a hot summer day in an urban area in Lynwood‚ California. I imagine Debbie’s
Premium Poetry English-language films Stanza
Assignement 1 contracts Sayres v. Wheatland Group‚ L.L.C.‚ 79 Va. Cir. 504 (Va. Cir. Ct. 2009) CASE SUMMARYPROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff filed suit against defendants alleging that the contract for the construction and sale of a home that was at issue in this case was void‚ invalid‚ and unenforceable. Plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to rescission and cancellation of the same contract. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the contract of sale. Plaintiff moved
Premium Contract
Doctrine of Judicial Binding Precedent This question raises the issue of the role of precedent. In order to examine the statement‚ scrutiny of the doctrine of the judicial precedent is required. Case law is used to describe the collection of reported decisions of the courts‚ and the principles which stem from them. Lord Macmillan made this observation that the case by case development is superior to those based on hypothetical models. “.....any fixed theory and that principles always fail because
Premium Common law Stare decisis Precedent
Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine Written By: Sitharam Korrapati Instructor: Professor Jolanta Pekalska Course: LEG500 April 26‚ 2013 Overview of Employment-At-Will and Exceptions to the Rule At-Will Presumption Employment relationships are presumed to be “at-will” in all U.S. states except Montana. The U.S. is one of a handful of countries where employment is predominantly at-will. Most countries throughout the world allow employers to dismiss employees only for cause
Premium Employment Human resource management
Why was the 1967 referendum significant in the fight for aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people? The Australian Referendum of 1967‚ called by Prime Minister Harold Holt‚ led to important and influential decisions and legislations; which ultimately bettered the lives of the first Australians. Although the amendments made to the constitution‚ were minimal and overall didn’t immediately amount to much‚ it was significant in the progression of the mentality of Australian society. One of the most
Premium Indigenous Australians Australia Constitution of Australia
acceptance * ‘Capacity or the ability to understand the consequences of a contract by persons of such age prescribed by law & those with sound mind. * ‘Mutual consent’ or agreement on the terms of a contract ‘consideration’‚ or reward for goods or services rendered. The element that distinguishes a contract from casual agreements is that it is legally binding: The law provides a remedy in the event that the promise is broken. Legally‚ certain types of contracts should be in writing‚
Premium Contract
contractual liability. There are three differences between liability and contractual liability: A. The difference of base. Contractual liability means that due to the breach of duty‚ contractual collateral obligation of contract or violates the "contract law" provisions of the obligations. Finding out a contractual liability has to be in terms of contract. However‚ there are no needs for liability‚ which point liability are monetary damages that are sought from the offending party. They are intended to
Premium Tort Tort law
Unit 5.5: The Separate Entity Doctrine “It is a basic doctrine of company law: that for certain purposes a company is a legal entity separate from the legal persons who became associated for its formation or who are now its members and directors. For certain purposes‚ there is a corporate screen around the members and directors. This is often referred as to the ‘Veil of Incorporation.’ The authority for that proposition is the leading case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22. The
Premium Business law Legal entities Corporation