citation number: [2015] UKSC 34 Haile (Appelant) v London Borough of Waltham Forest (Resppondent) On appeal from : [2014] EWCA Civ 792 Judgement date: 20 May 2015 Hearing date: 29 January 2015 Case summary: Justices: Lord Neuberger‚ Lady Hale‚ Lord Clarke‚ Lord Reed‚ Lord Carnwath Nature of the case: causational‚ intentional homelessness Facts: On 25 October 2011 the appellant voluntarily surrendered her tenancy in a hostel because of an unpleasant smell and moved for a temporary accommodation
Premium Family Law Pregnancy
Case Title: Regina v. G and another (Appellants) (On Appeal form the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) Citation: [2003] UKHL 50 Procedural History (PH): The appellants were charged on 22nd August 2000; without lawful excuse damaged by fire; commercial premises and being reckless as to whether such property would be damaged. The appellants stood trial before Judge Maher in March 2001. The appellants’ case at trial was that they expected the fire to extinguish itself on the concrete
Premium Mind Criminal law Mens rea
ensuring that you have an awareness of particular concepts‚ theories and principles‚ and that you are able to apply this material to marketing issues and problems that will arise from your workshop activities. The workshops will utilise formal input‚ case studies‚ journal and newspaper articles‚ and group discussions. The directed reading you will undertake will provide you firstly with a framework within which you can understand the appropriateness and validity of the workshop activities‚ and secondly
Premium Marketing
Apple vs. Samsung Apple and Samsung are the world’s two largest high-end mobile providers. Apple and Samsung are major competitors but are also business partners. Apple is one of Samsung’s biggest phone component customers and Samsung is one of Apple’s biggest suppliers. According to Bloomberg’s supply chain analysis‚ Apple accounts for 9% of Samsung’s revenue‚ which makes Apple Samsung’s largest costumer. Despite the companies’ business relationship‚ in April of 2011 Apple sued Samsung for
Premium Appeal Barack Obama United States
CIS 8060 Case Brief Grade Assessment Group Number/Name: The A-team Student Names: Paul Tran‚ Sukumar Pant‚ Vaibhav Choudhary Criteria Score and Comments Identifying Problems & Issues [15 points] • Use of case facts to diagnose core problems and issues • Effectiveness in framing the problem & issues Analysis of Issues [50 points] • Meaningful criteria identified for the analysis of problems and issues • Effective use of case data • Application of concepts and theories • Insightful
Premium Critical thinking Scientific method Logic
Name of Case in Proper Legal Citation Format Jones v. Star Credit Corp 59 Misc.2d 189 (1969) Who is/are the plaintiff(s) (i.e. consumer‚ company‚ employee‚ government) and what type of legal relief is/are the plaintiff(s) seeking? Plaintiffs who are welfare recipients agreed to purchase a freezer for $900‚ and purchase price came out to be $1234.80 with all the other added taxes. So far the plaintiffs have paid $619.88‚ however the freezer is only worth about $300. What legal question
Premium Common law Contract Law
United States v. Jones‚ United States Supreme Court (2012) 132 S. Ct. 945 Facts of the Case Respondent Jones was a subject of a Government investigation in part of a much larger drug trafficking conspiracy. As part of the investigation‚ FBI agents had obtained a court order to place a GPS tracking device on a vehicle driven by Jones – a Jeep registered to Jone’s wife. The court order was issued in the District of Columbia and was set to expire 10 days after it was signed by the judge. On Day
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Citation: Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition‚ 535 U.S. 232 (2002) Parties: John D. Ashcroft‚ Attorney General‚ and the Government of the United States‚ Petitioners The Free Speech Coalition‚ Respondents Facts: In 1996 Congress passed the federal Child Pornography Protection Act (CPPA) which extended federal prohibition against child pornography to sexually explicit images that appear to depict minors but that were actually produced without using real children. The CPPA statute in
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
module and is exploring your responses to organisational ethical dilemmas arising from your future business discipline. This should support and encourage the development of ethical awareness‚ ethical decision making and moral courage. The range of case studies aim to ensure that you find an issue that is relevant and interesting to you. You will work in peer groups of two or three and explore one vignette given to you in class. At the end of your peer discussion you must identify: * The
Premium Ethics
Tennessee V. Lane Case Before 2004‚ courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have‚ a handicapped entrance. At this time‚ it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building‚ you had to ask someone to carry you in‚ or even worse‚ you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years‚ however
Premium Supreme Court of the United States