In the case of Ross vs Davis‚ I would certainly rule in favor of Davis. Davis decided to leave her career by choice a full year prior to Ross’s disclaimer. When person leaves a job or career‚ a written notice is usually given to the employer. It appears in this case‚ someone in the Human Resource Department‚ or another unknown source had left out some of the information that should have been directed to Diana Ross about Gail Davis decision to resign from the job. Being in the profession that
Premium Law Communist state Management
Case Brief A.4 GNAZZO v. G.D. SEARLE & CO. 973 F.2d 136 (1992) U.S. Court of Appeals‚ Second Circuit Pierce‚ Circuit Judge Facts: On November 11‚ 1974‚ Gnazzo had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted in her uterus for contraceptive purposes. The IUD was developed‚ marketed and sold by G.D. Searle & Co. (Searle). When Gnazzo’s deposition was taken‚ she stated that her doctor had informed her that “the insertion would hurt‚ but not for long‚” and that she “would have uncomfortable and probably
Premium Civil procedure Causality Complaint
Page 517 918 F.2d 517 54 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 870‚ 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40‚455‚ 59 USLW 2378 Emma S. VAUGHN‚ Plaintiff-Appellant‚ v. Robert EDEL‚ et al.‚ Defendants‚ Texaco‚ Inc.‚ Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-3181 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals‚ Fifth Circuit. Dec. 6‚ 1990. Page 518 Kenneth J. Beck‚ Harvey‚ La.‚ for plaintiff-appellant. Albert H. Hanemann‚ Jr.‚ Lemle & Kelleher‚ John D. Fitzmorris‚ Jr.‚ Legal Dept. New Orleans‚ La.‚ for Texaco
Premium Discrimination Racism
requiring disclosure potential discrimination by requiring disclosure sexual orientation‚ sex‚ and about family life? III. Law used The court uses section 230 of the CDA to see if Roommates.com‚ LLC has immunity. The court uses this law to see if this case applies to RHA and state real estate discrimination law. IV. Reasoning Roommate.com‚ LLC is classified under 230 as an “information content provider” because the website made the questions‚ force users to answer them in order to use the website
Premium Discrimination Civil Rights Act of 1968 Sexual orientation
authority to accept the process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas Securities Commissioner and the return of service does not show a valid manner of service. At last‚ the appellate court of Texas reverse the trial court’s default judgment and remand this case for further proceedings. Issues: (a) Did the return of service shows that process was delivered to someone other than the one named in the citation? (b) Did JoAnn Kocerek has the authority to accept process on behalf of Harvestons or the Texas
Premium Civil procedure Service of process Complaint
Long-term vs. Short term psychotherapy Introduction Psychotherapy uses many psychological theories in order to assist an individual toward the resolution of a wide array of problems. Most commonly‚ psychotherapy is separated into two distinct categories short term psychotherapy and long term psychotherapy. Identifying which type of therapy to use on which individual is a very important process that each counselor must undergo once presented with the specific information‚ for each individual case. Short-term
Premium Time Psychology Term
Anthony Mastroianni v. County of Suffolk Case Decided in 1997 Facts of the Case: Law at Issue: The law at issue is Tort Liability for Municipal Corporation through the formation of a "special relationship between the municipality and the injured party" as outlined in Cuffy v. City of New York‚ 60 NY2d 225‚ 260. (Page 2 first full paragraph) Legal Issue: Whether the Municipal Corporation failed to provide reasonable protection to the decedent despite the existence of an order of protection
Premium Tort Tort law
William Le Grande v. B & L Services‚ INC. π (1983) ∆ FACTS: π set his own schedule‚ and operated independent and at his own discretion. π could use ∆ dispatch service but was not required to and could pick up passengers at his own discretion. π signed a K with ∆ disclaiming any ER/EE relationship. π paid ∆ a daily fee and paid for fuel. π kept all addition money. ∆ required π to keep "trip sheets" and comply with a simple dress code‚ both mandated by local ordinance. ∆ provided
Premium The Work Judgment Control
NAACP v. Alabama (1958) I. Facts: In an effort to oust the NAACP from operating in the state‚ Alabama accused the NAACP of failing to comply with a state statute that required foreign corporations to register with the state before operating‚ which had been violated when the organization began operating in Alabama in 1914. After the organization tendered the necessary documentation‚ Alabama refused to accept it and instead ordered the release of the names and addresses of all member and agents of
Premium United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Behihana of Tokyo‚ Inc. v. Benihana‚ Inc.‚ 906 A.2d 114 (Del. 2006) Facts: Rocky Aoki founded Benihana of Tokyo‚ Inc. (BOT)‚ and its subsidiary‚ Benihana‚ which own and operate Benihana restaurants in the United States and other countries. Aoki transferred his 100% ownership of BOT to Benihana Protective Trust in 1998 in order to avoid licensing problems stemming from his conviction on insider trading charges. Benihana‚ a Delaware corporation‚ had two classes of common stock. There were 6 million
Premium Stock Corporation Fiduciary