Cargill vs. Intra Strata Assurance Corporation; March 15‚ 2010 Issues: 1.Whether petitioner is doing or transacting business in the Philippines in contemplation of the law and established jurisprudence; 2.Whether respondent is estopped from invoking the defense that petitioner has no legal capacity to sue in the Philippines; Facts: Petitioner Cargill‚ Inc. (petitioner) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware‚ United States of America. Petitioner and Northern
Premium Corporation Jurisdiction Legal terms
WHITE LIGHT CORPORATION V CITY OF MANILA G.R. No. 122846 January 20‚ 2009 FACTS December 3‚ 1992‚ City Mayor Alfredo S. Lim signed into law the Manila City Ordinance No. 7774 entitled‚ “An Ordinance Prohibiting Short-Time Admission‚ Short-Time Admission Rates‚ and Wash-Up Rate Schemes in Hotels‚ Motels‚ Inns‚ Lodging Houses‚ Pension Houses‚ and Similar Establishments in the City of Manila” which prohibits short-time admission shall mean admittance and charging of room rate for less than
Premium Property Manila
ARAÑES VS. OCCIANO (Judges Solmenizing Marriage) Mercedita Arañes filed charges against Judge Salvador Occiano of the Municipal Circuit Trial Court of Batalan‚ Camarines Sur with Gross Ignorance of Law. Occiano solemnized Arañes’ marriage without the requisite marriage license in latter’s house which is outside judge’s jurisdiction. Arañes was not able to claim her right to inherit his deceased husband’s property and she was deprived of receiving her husband’s pension. Occiano avers that the ceremony
Premium Marriage Psychology Family therapy
People Vs. Reyes 427 SCRA 28 FACTS: On the 11th of July 1998‚ a seventy four year-old lady was found bloody dead sprawled sideways on the floor opposite the sink near the kitchen. The fact that the crime was committed inside the victim’s dwelling without the permission of the latter is indeed an aggravating robbery with homicide. The appellant; Antonio Reyes said that he was not aware of what he was doing while he was committing the robbery because he was drunk and killing Ms. Lagrada is not
Premium Criminal law Death English-language films
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila THIRD DIVISION G.R. No. 170661 December 4‚ 2009 RAMON B. FORMANTES‚ Petitioner‚ vs. DUNCAN PHARMACEUTICALS‚ PHILS.‚ INC.‚ Respondent. SUMMARY (FACTS): Ramon B. Formantes‚ the Acting District Manager of respondent for the Ilocos District‚ filed a case for illegal suspension and constructive dismissal against respondent company after the company did not allow him to attend the meetings and activities‚ withheld his salary‚ and
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
G.R. No. 80264 May 31‚ 1989 SAN MIGUEL VILLAGE SCHOOL‚ petitioner‚ vs. HONORABLE AMIR PUKUNUM D. PUNDOGAR and CHRISTINA TRIÑO‚ respondents. Estelito R. Alvia for petitioner. Macalalag Law Office & Associates for private respondent. FELICIANO‚ J.: On 2 October 1985‚ petitioner San Miguel Village School filed a complaint for breach of contract with damages against respondent Christina Triño‚ before the Regional Trial Court‚ Branch 3‚ Lanao del Norte‚ the complaint being docketed as Civil
Premium 1923
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH BOARD OF MEDICINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH‚ Petitioner‚ vs. CASE NO. 2003-99999 ANNA HILO‚ M.D.‚ Respondent. _________________________/ PETITION FOR FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING Respondent Anna Hilo‚ M.D.‚ (“Dr. Hilo”)‚ by and through her undersigned counsel‚ pursuant to sections 120.60‚ 120.57‚ and 120.569‚ Florida Statutes‚ file this petition for formal administrative proceeding and state: 1. Petitioner is the Department of Health (“DOH”)
Premium Alcohol abuse Medicine Florida
Manila EN BANC G.R. No. 153690 February 15‚ 2011 DAVID LU‚ Petitioner‚ vs. PATERNO LU YM‚ SR.‚ PATERNO LU YM‚ JR.‚ VICTOR LU YM‚ JOHN LU YM‚ KELLY LU YM‚ and LUDO & LUYM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‚ Respondents. x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x G.R. No. 157381 PATERNO LU YM‚ SR.‚ PATERNO LU YM‚ JR.‚ VICTOR LU YM‚ JOHN LU YM‚ KELLY LU YM‚ and LUDO & LUYM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION‚ Petitioners‚ vs. DAVID LU‚ Respondent. x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x G.R. No.
Premium Appellate court Trial court Supreme court
Re Gonzales‚ 160 SCRA 771 (1988) Fast factsRaul Gonzales forwarded an anonymous letter by “Concerned Employees of the Supreme Court” to Justice Fernan. Theletter was addressed to Gonzales referring to charges for disbarment brought by Miguel Cuenco against Justice Fernan andasking “to do something about this.” The action against Fernan was filed in the Tanodbayan. Tanodbayan – special prosecutor like a fiscal; ombudsman.Administrative Case No. 3135Resolution dated February 1988 entitled “Miguel
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States House of Representatives
Francisco v. Gregorio GR No. L-59519 July 20‚ 1982 Facts: Petitioner Francisco‚ through her daughter‚ agreed to lease a piece of land where a building should be constructed by the former. The contract provided‚ among others: the deposit to the account of the lessor-petitioner the amount of 150k representing 30K goodwill money and 120K advanced rental and a stipulation that in case the parties will not agree as to the terms and conditions of the final contract of lease‚ the pre-lease contract shall
Premium Debt Money Interest