G.R. No. 171118 In cases when an employee is unjustly dismissed from work‚ he shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges‚ inclusive of allowances‚ and other benefits or their monetary equivalent from the time the compensation was withheld up to the time of actual reinstatement. The awards of moral damages and exemplary damages are also in order and grant of attorney’s fees is likewise proper. ISSUES: 1. WON the respondents were validly dismissed
Premium Legal terms Employment Pleading
Of all the games ever invented by man‚ golf‚ in my opinion‚ is by far the greatest. Golf is different than other games. Golf challenges the mind‚ body‚ and soul. Golf is not a game that is meant to be played against other people or even against the course‚ it is a game that challenges the individual. It forces a person to make decisions that can lead to a feeling of great accomplishment or to a feeling of hopelessness and despair. To the average person golf my be just a game‚ but to millions of golfers
Premium Golf
TAYAG v BENGUET CONSOLIDATED‚ INC. Facts: In this case there was an order issued by the CFI of Manila compelling the domiciliary administrator of the Trust Company of New York to surrender to the ancillary administrator in the Philippines the stock certificates owned by the deceased Idonah Perkins to satisfy the legitimate claims of local creditors. However‚ such company challenged the said order invoking some provisions of its by-laws concerning procedures to be followed in surrendering a stock
Premium Corporation Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Restituto Ynot Vs IAC GR NO 74457 March 20 1987 CASE DIGEST Facts On January 13‚ 1984‚ the petitioner transported six carabaos in a pump boat from Masbate to Iloilo when the same was confiscated by the police station commander of Barotac Nuevo‚ Iloilo for the violation of E.O. 626-A. A case was filed by the petitioner questioning the constitutionality of executive order and the recovery of the carabaos. After considering the merits of the case‚ the confiscation was sustained and the court declined
Premium Supreme court Appellate court
Business Law Kikuchi‚ Nikka Lei N. October 14‚ 2014 Cuadra v. Monfort Case Digest Statement of the facts: I. Maria Teresa Cuadra and Maria Teresa Monfort were classmates in Grade Six at the Mabini Elementary School in Bacolod City. On July 9‚ 1962 their teacher assigned them‚ together with three other classmates‚ to weed the grass in the school premises. While thus engaged Maria Teresa Monfort found a plastic headband‚ an ornamental object commonly worn by young girls
Free Logic Parent Mother
Case Digest HW8 – Dropbox: "It just works" Information Technology for Management (MGMTMBA 207) Questions1: Dropbox is a late mover in a crowded space. What opportunity did Houston see? Specifically‚ what are the key elements of Dropbox’s current business model? The Niche Even though Dropbox was kind of a late mover‚ it found its niche and therefore increased its market share. At the initial stage‚ Houston found the on-line storage suppliers were unable to provide fast and fluent synchronization
Premium Google Marketing Cloud computing
Case Digest on Natural Resources Law San Miguel Corporation vs. Court of Appeals Facts: A petition for review on certiorari was filed by San Miguel Corporation (SMC) against Court of Appeals for denying its application for registration of a parcel of land located at Sta. Anastacia‚ Sto. Tomas‚ Batangas with lot number 684 with an area of 14‚531 square meters. The lot was purchased by SMC from Silverio Perez in the amount of Php 133‚084.80 on December 23‚ 1975. Accordingly he inherited
Premium Appellate court Supreme Court of the United States Trial court
1-a. IN RE: Ramon Tulfo Facts: In Oct. 13‚ 1989‚ Tulfo wrote an article in his column in PDI ’On Target’ stating that the Supreme Court rendered an idiotic decision in legalizing checkpoints‚ and again on Oct. 16‚ 1989‚ where he called the Supreme Court stupid and "sangkatutak na mga bobo justices of the Philippine Supreme Court". Tulfo was required to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt. Tulfo said that he was just reacting emotionally because he had been a victim of harassmen
Premium Freedom of speech Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
MAXIMO SOLIVEN vs. HON. RAMON MAKASIAR G.R. No. L-82585 LUIS BELTRAN vs. HON. RAMON MAKASIAR G.R. No. L-82827‚ G.R. No. L-83979 November 14‚ 1988 Facts: This is a petition for certiorari and prohibition to review the decision of the RTC of Manila. The facts are stated in the resolution of the Court regarding G.R Nos. 82585‚ 82827 and 83979; wherefore‚ the petitioner’s were lump together considering these cases were same in character. In these consolidated cases‚ 3 principal issues were raised:
Premium United States Constitution Prima facie Freedom of speech
Chavez vs. Romulo G.R. No. 157036‚ June 9‚ 2004A mere license is always revocable FACTS: This case is about the ban on the carrying of firearms outside of residence in order to deter the rising crime rates. Petitioner questions the ban as a violation of his right to property ISSUE: Whether or not the revocation of permit to carry firearms is unconstitutional and Whether or not the right to carry firearms is a vested property right HELD: Petitioner cannot find solace to the above-quoted
Premium Law United States Constitution Property law