G.R. No. 185122 August 16‚ 2010 WENSHA SPA CENTER‚ INC. and/or XU ZHI JIE‚ Petitioners‚ vs. LORETA T. YUNG‚ Respondent. A petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by an employer who was charged before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for dismissing an employee upon the advice of a Feng Shui master. Facts: Wensha Spa Center‚ Inc. (Wensha) in Quezon City is in the business of sauna bath and massage services. Xu Zhi Jie a.k.a. Pobby
Premium Employment Termination of employment Legal terms
ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION V NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY‚ LTD. [CITATION] QUISUMBING; May 2‚ 2006 NATURE Petition for review on certiorari FACTS - Societe Francaise Des Colloides loaded a cargo of textiles and auxiliary chemicals from France on board a vessel owned by Franco-Belgian Services‚ Inc. - The cargo was consigned to General Textile‚ Inc.‚ in Manila and insured by respondent New India Assurance Company‚ Ltd. - While in Hongkong‚ the cargo was transferred to M/V P. Aboitiz
Premium Insurance
Case Digest: U.S. vs. Ah Chong G.R. No. L-7929 March 19‚ 1910 Facts: Because of the many bad elements happening at Fort McKinley‚ Ah Chong‚ a cook‚ locked himself in his room by placing a chair against the door. After having gone to bed‚ he was awakened by someone trying to open the door of his room. He called out twice‚ Who is there‚ but received no answer. Fearing that the intruder was a robber‚ he leaped from his bed and called out again‚ If you enter the room I will kill you. But at the precise
Premium Criminal law Supreme Court of the United States Court
PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE - FULL TEXT The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation G.R. Nos. 138934-35 January 16‚ 2002 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. ANTHONY ESCORDIAL | | | |[pic] | |Republic of the Philippines | |SUPREME COURT
Premium Negros Occidental
CASE TITLE: Jessie Ching v. William Salinas‚ Sr.‚ William Salinas‚ Jr.‚ Josephine Salinas‚ Jennifer Salinas‚ Alonto Solaiman Salle‚ John Eric Salinas‚ Noel Yabut (Board of Directors and Officers of WILAWARE PROUDCT CORPORATION) PETITIONER’S CLAIMS: Petitioner’s insisted that his works are covered by Sections 172.1 and 172.2 of the Intellectual Property Code and that the copyright certificates issued by the National Library are prima facie evidence of its validity‚ citing the ruling of the United
Premium Patent Invention
Aznar vs. Garcia Facts: Edward Christensen was born in new York but migrated to California where he resided for a period of 9 years. In 1913‚ he came to the Philippines where he became a domiciliary until his death. In his will‚ he instituted an acknowledged natural daughter‚. Maria lucy Christensen (legitimate)‚ as his only heir‚ but left a legacy sum of money in favor‚ of Helen Christensen Garcia (illigetimate). Counsel for Helen claims that under article 16‚ paragraph 2 of the civil code‚ California
Premium Marriage Family law Law
Aglipay v. Ruiz GR 45459‚ 13 March 1937 (64 Phil 201) First Division‚ Laurel (p): 5 concur. Facts: In May 1936‚ the Director of Posts announced in the dailies of Manila that he would order the issuance of postage stamps commemorating the celebration in the City of Manila of the 33rd International Eucharistic Congress‚ organized by the Roman Catholic Church. The petitioner‚ Mons. Gregorio Aglipay‚ Supreme Head of the Philippine Independent Church‚ in the fulfillment of what he considers to be a
Premium Philippines Roman Catholic Church Christianity
Salazar‚ Kristine Kim B. 4-DLM 1. Arturo Tolentino vs Secretary of Finance FACTS: Tolentino et al is questioning the constitutionality of RA 7716 otherwise known as the Expanded Value Added Tax (EVAT) Law. Tolentino averred that this revenue bill did not exclusively originate from the House of Representatives as required by Section 24‚ Article 6 of the Constitution. Even though RA 7716 originated as HB 11197 and that it passed the 3 readings in the HoR‚ the same did not complete the 3 readings
Premium Tax Value added tax Indirect tax
ASUNZA‚ Charles Darvin S. 4LM RESTATE THE FOLLOWING: 1. ARTICLE 279 No less than the Constitution recognizes and guarantees the labor’s right to security of tenure. Under the Labor Code of the Philippines‚ as amended‚ specifically‚ Article 279 of the said Code‚ the security of tenure has been construed to mean as that “the employer shall not terminate the services of an employee except for a just cause or when authorized” by the Code. The two facets of this legal provision are: (a) the
Premium Employment
Common Carrier De Guzman vs Court of Appeals G.R. No. L-47822‚ December 22‚ 1988 Ponente : Feliciano‚ J.: Facts: Ernesto Cendana was engaged in buying up used bottles and scrap metal in Pangasinan and upon gathering sufficient quantities of such scrap material‚ respondent would bring such material to Manila for resale. On the return trip to Pangasinan‚ respondent would load his vehicles with cargo which various merchants wanted delivered to differing establishments in Pangasinan. For that
Premium Cargo Legal terms Transport