Zach Tverberg HPE 466 September 17‚ 2014 Case Brief 1 Case Name: Andes v. Young Men’s Christian Association‚ 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 788 (Cal. App. 6 Dist. 1998) Summation of Facts: In May of 1998‚ the parents (plaintiffs) of Stephen Andres sued the YMCA (defendant) in a wrongful death suit. Stephan Andres drowned in a spa pool in a locker room at the YMCA facility. The parents believed that the YMCA was negligent by not having lifeguards in the spa pool area of the locker room where Stephen
Premium Clinical psychology Psychology KILL
Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.‚ 42 Cal. 4th 807 (2007) Judicial History: Various plaintiffs sued Mitsubishi Motors Corporation after a sport utility vehicle rolled over while driven on a freeway. The trial court entered an order granting the defense a motion to disqualify plaintiff’s legal team and experts. The California Court of Appeal affirmed its decision and plaintiffs sought review. Facts: Plaintiffs’ attorney obtained notes from one of the defense attorneys and used them during
Premium Court Civil procedure Law
for trespass to her bedroom and communal areas: Cowell v Rosehill Racecourse (1937) 56 CLR 605 ENTERING BEDROOM‚ PLACING PLANTS ON FLOOR Presumably‚ Donald intended (Nickells v Melbourne Corporation (1938) 59 CLR 219) the direct interferences (Southport Corp v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd [1954] 2 QB 182 (‘Southport’)) of entering Alexis’s bedroom and placing plants on the floor. Donald interfered by entering Alexis’s room without authority (Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635 (‘Plenty’)) as Alexis revoked
Premium Law Tort Property
Information System Briefing With the changes in the health care industry‚ we have come to rely on information technology more‚ and more each day. When organizations take the time to plan‚ manage‚ and develop an information technology program‚ will make the organization more efficient‚ better working environment and better decision making processes. There are many steps that need to be put in place when selecting an information system. Taking the time and finding those who will fully understand
Premium
Obergefell v. Hodges is the Supreme Court Case that gay marriage legal in all fifty states. The case required that all states allow gay marriages and recognize gay marriages that happened in other states. It was a 5-4 decision that was based on the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th amendment. Obergefell wanted his marriage in Maryland to be recognized in Ohio‚ so he could collect the benefits from his partners death. Hodges is the director of the Ohio Health Department. The Supreme Court decided
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Marriage
sell. Also‚ KK’s response had no intention to get into an agreement upon providing the information hence statement is not an offer: Harvey V Facey - Therefore‚ when Homer mentioned “sounds like a
Premium Contract law Contract Offer and acceptance
The United States legal system gives all people the right to an attorney to help defend the prosecuted individual. The court case Buck v. Davis shows how a person’s rights could be given but in a way that would go against the one being charged for a crime. Duane Buck is an African American who was tried for being involved in a murder of his ex-girlfriend and her friend in the state of Texas. Many different types of evidence showed that Duane Buck had committed that crime and his passed issues
Premium Law United States Constitution Jury
Terry v. Ohio: Martin McFadden was a police officer in Ohio who noticed that two individuals appeared to be acting suspiciously. While watching these people from his police car‚ Officer McFadden noticed that these two men appeared to be planning a criminal attack. The two men were walking back and forth in front of a store while conspiring with each other. When McFadden approached the two men and identified himself as a law enforcement officer‚ he walked them down the street and frisked them for
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Crime
charges. The Riley v. California case was argued April 29‚ 2014 and decided on June 25‚ 2014.The main issue in this case was how the police officer searched his phone without a warrant then arrested him and if this action violated the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment clearly states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures…”.
Premium
have addressed the constitutional rights of individuals and groups. These decisions have limited as well as expanded the rights of the members of these groups. Cases such as Korematsu v. United States and Roe v. Wade are examples of the limitation and expansion of rights. The historical circumstances surrounding the case of Korematsu v. U.S. are as follows. In the 1940’s there was a strong anti-Japanese feeling throughout all of America. There was an act passed requiring all people of Japanese
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution