Alicia V.‚ based on her symptoms‚ is diagnosed with PCOS. This is based on the findings that she is experiencing weight gain‚ unwanted hair growth‚ acne‚ a normal external genitalia‚ cervix‚ and vagina‚ and amenorrhea. Alicia has secondary amenorrhea because she has high levels of prolactin‚ which suppress GnRH and FSH. This is demonstrated by her low FSH levels. Alicia has hirsutism as insulin producing cells are overactive and create too much insulin. This increase in insulin causes her ovaries
Premium
Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988‚ Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case‚ Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989)‚ divided the court which eventually rejected that
Premium Capital punishment Crime Supreme Court of the United States
The musical selection that I believe is significant to the overall service would be Psalm 141. One particular characteristics that makes it significance to the service is it utilizes the word “evening”‚which makes it very appropriate to the overall service. One of which would be in the first verse‚ where it is written as “let my prayer rise before you like incense‚ the raising of my hands like an evening oblation.” Additionally‚ right before this‚ there was incense being used right before this selection
Premium Christianity Christian terms Prayer
“Move It” The plaintiffs’ main argument in the case centered on that of the main plaintiff‚ Mary Watson‚ a single woman. Ms. Watson claimed when she visited one of the Move It’s outlet stores‚ she observed several items that were marked with tags containing two prices; a “Suggested Retail Price” and
Premium Law Lawyer United States
Chavez vs. Romulo G.R. No. 157036‚ June 9‚ 2004A mere license is always revocable FACTS: This case is about the ban on the carrying of firearms outside of residence in order to deter the rising crime rates. Petitioner questions the ban as a violation of his right to property ISSUE: Whether or not the revocation of permit to carry firearms is unconstitutional and Whether or not the right to carry firearms is a vested property right HELD: Petitioner cannot find solace to the above-quoted
Premium Law United States Constitution Property law
The case: Watson vs Brown Issue: The case concerned the right of Mr. Watson right to protest against the Brown Corporation. Mr.Watson says that the Brown Corporation has been attacking him because he posted an article about how their products aren’t really real and they have been selling the people fake products. Watson’s claim was the Brown Corporation was taking his 4th Amendment protection away from by them constantly coming after him because he posted the article about their Cooperation. The
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Briefing: Each year the State of Nevada issues the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The most recent being the 2011 report that was issued by Kim R. Wallin‚ the State Controller‚ for the fiscal year ending June 30‚ 2011. In recent elections‚ there have been some additions to the Nevada elected board members. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of government accounting and reporting‚ and to introduce the Nevada CAFR to the newly
Premium Finance Generally Accepted Accounting Principles United States
This is evident in the case of Virginia Rappe‚ a popular silent film actress who died in the days following a party with the biggest star at the time‚ Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle. The case was based on the assumption that her death‚ caused by a ruptured bladder‚ was due to being raped by Arbuckle. This case was filled with many conflicting testimonies along with the influence of the press making the persecution of Arbuckle impossible. The police investigation of this case was met with many difficulties
Premium Family Pregnancy Mother
resolution of the Court regarding G.R Nos. 82585‚ 82827 and 83979; wherefore‚ the petitioner’s were lump together considering these cases were same in character. In these consolidated cases‚ 3 principal issues were raised: 1) whether or not petitioners were denied due process when information for libel were filed against them although the finding of the existence of prima facie case was still under review by the Secretary of Justice and‚ subsequently‚ by the President; 2) whether or not the constitutional
Premium United States Constitution Prima facie Freedom of speech
2. Decision has to be taken in favor of Perry. In this case‚ Alice was a dual agent. When representing two principals it is likely the interest of one party was to suffer. Alice has breached her fiduciary to both Perry and David. After Perry discovered that David employed Alice he had the right to rescind. 8. In this case there are judgment for Timothy assuming that a lawyer acting reasonably would have had the opportunity to realize the revised statute of limitations period. As an agent‚ Cynthia
Premium Law Court Appeal