Business Administration University of Santo Tomas "SNAPPLE: REVITALIZING A BRAND" In partial fulfillment of the academic requirement for the course BA31 Brand Management Submitted by: Bandian‚ Alvin Co Ting‚ Annie May W. Fernandez‚ Anthony C. Francisco‚ Mary Abelaine J. Lee‚ Marvin John C. 4M5 Submitted to: Eric G. Pasquin‚ MBA Course Lecturer September 24‚ 2013 THE MAIN PARTS OF A CASE STUDY I. Background Information Snapple Corporation was established way back to 1972 in Brooklyn
Premium Advertising Brand Marketing
From 1972 to 1993‚ why did Snapple flourish when so many small start-up premium fruit drinks stayed small or disappeared? * Premium pricing allowed the company to introduce a variety of products‚ many of which were unsuccessful‚ while still remaining profitable * Hired a professional management team that used focus groups to improve label design‚ increased the advertising budget‚ and intensified the independent distributor system throughout the East Coast * Successful advertising and
Premium Marketing
Snapple’s brand is a customer-based brand. Snapple is the first company to produce a complete line of all-natural beverages and they were “made from the best stuff on earth.” In 1980‚ Snapple created the non-carbonated ready-to-drink beverages with fruit juices and iced teas. Snapple brand equity: Customers love Snapple The name of “Snapple” is attractive Quirky Logo and packaging Word-of mouth advertising Advertisement with Wendy “the Snapple Lady” is very special Where did Quaker go wrong
Premium Marketing Stock market Revenue
which claimed the lives of millions. Despite clear indications of genocide‚ the international community avoided intervention for 100 days. During the Hinkley Institute forum‚ “Rwanda: The Pursuit of International Justice‚ Then and Now‚” Ambassador Prosper argued that nations must intervene globally‚ as war crimes violate international law‚ evade UN tribunals‚ and disallow citizens from reshaping domestic policy. Yet‚ despite his inspirational claim that individuals affect international affairs‚ the
Premium United States United Nations Rwandan Genocide
Case Recap This case describes the various aspects of carbonated soft drink industry and the focuses on Squirt’s annual advertising and promotion plan in 2001. Squirt is a brand under the Dr Pepper/Seven Up‚ inc. The brand manager was concerned about the market targeting and product positioning and consulted advertising agency‚ Foote‚ Cone & Belding. The case also focuses on the entire industry structure and the marketing techniques used by the various leading companies so the Squirt’s annual advertising
Premium Marketing Soft drink Coca-Cola
The Acquisition of Snapple by Quaker Oats In an effort to raise the company’s growth rate and avoid a takeover.Quaker Oats‚ acquired Snapple beverage corporation for $1‚7 billion‚a price considered by many to be valued a billion too much. Snapple captured a significant loyal following by being an innovator in the ready-to-drink tea.The RTD tea segment of the beverage market was a quick developing area with promising returns ‚that’s why it attracted giants like coca cola and Pepsico‚ who entered
Free Gatorade Coca-Cola Pepsi
known as a popular and user friendly “ready-to-drink” beverage. The huge growth Snapple was able to achieve was due in part to the almost cultish fan base that Snapple developed. For example‚ a family in New Jersey even gave their son the middle name Snapple. Studies showed that ready-to-drink beverages were selected almost strictly based upon fashion‚ taste‚ and status related considerations. For this reason‚ Snapple gained appeal through alternative means of marketing. They used product placements
Premium Marketing Drink Coffee
Snapple and Aqualisa Hints Snapple hints given during lecture. 1. Understand the Snapple customer(s). 2. Product development is important. a. how does Snapple identify new products? b. how does Snapple decide how much to produce? 3. Don’t forget to read the ethnographic research in the back of the case. Snapple Discussion Questions This is an interesting case on how entrepreneurs can make $1.7B‚ how a major firm can lose $1.3B‚ and how a well-trained manager can be a hero. Pay
Premium Customer Anthropology Ethnography
Dockers and Snapple - Branding Elements and Marketing Programs Differences Adaptability – Starting with Docker’s‚ Levi Strauss & Co. was able to adapt their brands‚ more so than Snapple‚ in response to changes in consumer values‚ opinions and the need to for their product to remain contemporary relevant (Keller‚ 2008a‚ pg. 143). The Dockers brand was the first casual pant of its kind and over the years changed to include wrinkle free‚ khakis and stain defender technology to compete with various
Premium Brand management Brand
Problem: Develop a strategy for Snapple ’s recovery after a three year trend of declining sales under the management of Triarc Companies. Sales had declined almost 35% in three years (from $674 MM in 1994 to $440 MM in 1997) and had the profile that the company had achieved great success with was diminished. Issues History: Small company origins based on authenticity and trust in consumers eyes. (ref. Exhibit 6 Pivotal Characteristics) This was evident in the initial mantra of the company
Premium Marketing Distribution