The objective of the mealworm experiment was to see if the mealworms would gain weight in either peat moss or wheat germ. The experiment included weighing Mealworm A and Mealworm B before putting Mealworm A in wheat germ and Mealworm B in peat moss both for 7 days. After a week they were weighed again and Mealworm A had lost weight and Mealworm B had gained . This concluded that the null hypothesis was rejected since only Mealworm B gained weight. Introduction The mealworm is not a worm. It is
Premium Beetle Null hypothesis Hypothesis
Effect of Substrate Choice On Growth Of Mealworms Abstract: The experiment is designed to show which substrate A or B will better nourish a mealworm. A mealworm was placed in each substrate for a period of seven days and the change in mass from Day 1 to Day 7 was compared. The data was compiled and statistically analyzed. The experiment failed to reject the null hypotheses that there would be no difference in the two substrates regarding meal worm growth
Premium Statistical hypothesis testing Null hypothesis
Mealworms eating Potatoes Report What will gain mass? What will lose mass? What color did the BTB change? What are atoms moving from? Where are they moving to? I predicted that the potato would lose mass‚ and the mealworms would gain mass. I predicted that the BTB would lose mass. My last prediction was that the atoms are moving from the potato and into the mealworms. Steps for our procedure: 1.)Get container deep enough so mealworms can’t crawl out‚ with holes for them to breathe. 2.)Record container
Premium Hypothesis Prediction Futurology
Scientific Method - Mealworms Abstract The experiment is designed to determine which substrate‚ A (oat bran) or B (peat moss) will be better nourishment for a mealworm after exposed for 7 days. A total of 30 mealworms were placed in the substrates for a period of 7 days; 15 in substrate A and 15 in substrate B. The data was compiled and analyzed on day 7 to determine the change of mass in each of the mealworms. The experiment proved my hypothesis to be correct; the mealworms would not thrive
Premium Temperature Celsius
Analysis Growth of Mealworms Abstract The experiment is designed to show which substrate A or B will better nourishment for a mealworm. A mealworm was placed in each substrate for a period of seven days and the change in mass from Day 1 to Day 7 was compared. The data was compiled and statistically analyzed. The experiment failed to reject the null hypotheses that there would be no difference in the two substrates regarding meal worm growth. The conclusion that there was a difference
Premium Hypothesis Null hypothesis Scientific method
Introduction The purpose of this experiment was to study the effects of ethanol on the cellular respiration of mealworms. Cellular respiration is the process by which cells harvest the energy stored in food. It is the intake of oxygen and energy in the form of glucose‚ and the cells ability to break it down into carbon dioxide‚ water‚ and energy required for the body to function. More scientifically‚ it is a three-step pathway that produces ATP (adenosine triphosphate.) The three stages of cellular
Free Carbon dioxide Oxygen Adenosine triphosphate
Abstract In this experiment‚ the preferences of mealworms towards lighted and dark environments were tested. The main question posed was whether the behavior of the mealworms would be affected by the variable of light‚ and whether they would move towards or away from the light source (taxis). We placed ten mealworms into two adjoining containers and tried to simulate the effects of above ground and underground by exposing the mealworms to minimal amounts of light in one of the containers (underground)
Premium Hypothesis Gene Nutrition
Results: The mealworms that were in the room temperature water have a higher cellular respiration rate than the mealworms in the cold water. This is because while they are in the cold water‚ the mealworm’s body slows down which decreases the amount of CO2 that is being produced. Unlike the mealworms in room temperature water‚ their cellular respiration was higher because their body temperature remained the same creating CO2 at a faster rate. Since there were two different controlled groups‚ there
Premium Carbon dioxide Energy Cellular respiration
Mealworms and Caffeine Caffeine is the most commonly used stimulant in the United States. In North America‚ sixty to seventy five percent of caffeine consumption comes from coffee and fifteen percent to thirty percent comes from tea. It can be found in a variety of forms including: coffee‚ tea‚ chocolate‚ soft drinks. Caffeine is a part of a family of drugs known as methylxanthines.To work‚ caffeine disrupts the neurotransmitter adenosine. Caffeine is known to cause physical dependence in humans
Premium Coffee Caffeine Starbucks
According to the data‚ the population size obtained for Group RG/CL is an outlier in respect to other groups’ population sizes. After two weeks of sampling and counting the population of mealworms‚ a population of 506 mealworms was calculated. A very broad confidence interval was also calculated‚ ranging from 143.58 to 868.42 (Table 1). Although other groups seem to have large confidence intervals‚ they are within a 200-300 limit. The confidence interval calculated for Group RG/CL has about a 700
Premium Statistics Normal distribution Standard deviation