"Egoism" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 5 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feminist Objections to Kantian‚ Utilitarianism‚ and Egoism Many feminists have problems or objections to Kantian morals‚ utilitarian ideas‚ and egoism. The feminist morals are based on care and equality. Many of these ethics have a lot of problems when relating to a feminist. Feminists have a lot of objections to Kantian morals. For example‚ there is too much emphasis on duty. For example‚ a feminist might argue that because feminists emphasize care so much‚ duty can sometimes overshadow care

    Premium Immanuel Kant Jeremy Bentham Terri Schiavo case

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    whether or not we are conscious of it. The five arguments against ethical egoism is plausible. Inconsistent outcome argument simply tries to prove that ethical egoism cannot be true because it fails to meet the necessary condition of morality which is being a guide to action. Publicity argument says that egoist’s egoistic project cannot be publicly advertised without harming the project itself. Paradox of Ethical Egoism says that for an egoist to achieve something‚ he must give up his egoistic belief

    Premium Ethical egoism Egoism Individualism

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is the definition of ethical egoism? Ethical egoism is a normative theory that simply means everyone should have their own best interest at heart and not be obligated to help others. Ethical egoism states that people should do what benefits them the most. When an ethical egoist makes a decision‚ the attitude is that looking out for others is self-defeating. “We ought to do what will promote the interests of everyone alike. The interests of everyone will be promoted if each of us adopts the

    Premium Ethical egoism Egoism Individualism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Egoism (Prescriptive Theory) * -Normative Theory * -EE Defined * -Difference from psychological egoism -Why many philosophers reject EE * Argument from paradigm cases- standard argument against EE. Ex: (1) If a moral theory requires you to do “x” where ”x” is a paradigm case of wrongness just because it benefits you‚ then that moral theory is false.(2) EE requires you to do “x” where ‘x’ is morally wrong‚ just because it benefits you.(3) EE is false. (I.e.: murder‚

    Premium Ethical egoism Egoism Morality

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain the difference between psychological and ethical egoism‚ and why Rachels rejects both of these theories. Do you think his arguments are convincing? Why‚ or why not? Psychological egoism: all men are selfish in everything that they do; the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self interest Even if what they do is benefiting others‚ they are to believe that whatever they are doing is actually to their own benefit Ethical egoism: a normative view about how men ought to act. Regardless

    Premium Morality Cultural relativism Culture

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egoism

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Egoism vs. Virtue Egoism is a habit of valuing everything only in reference to one’s personal interest or gain. Basically selfishness‚ almost an arrogance and conceit of one’s self and only things that will boomerang Back for self gain. In Ethical egoism we will focus on two psychological egoism and ethical egoism. I will also compare egoism to virtue. Egoism is a totally self-centered‚ self-gaining‚ and self-gratifying belief system and theory. In some strange ways I did began to understand

    Premium Virtue

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    explicit line of critique: e.g Paley’s teleological argument and the problem of evil as presented either by Hume or Dostoevsky) Or you can make the major point of emphasis a critique of one of the arguments. (E.g. Rachels critique of Rand’s ethical egoism…as noted‚ that would require an elaboration of Rand’s view as well.) A distinct option would be that you could present your own thinking on the subject (after presenting a view- do you think it withstands rational scrutiny? Why/why not? Obviously

    Premium Teleological argument Teleology Existence of God

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    would be happy” p153 - Browne uses a concept that he calls the “Merry-go-round” that has no ultimate purpose or end p154 - Instead of using the term selfish we should give “prudential generosity” p154 - Browne grounds his views on psychological egoism‚ believes that we follow everything by a single motive “self-love” p154 - Unselfishness trap : the belief that you must be the happiness of others before your own - Everyone motive is doing what he believes will assure his happiness

    Premium Selfishness Happiness Egoism

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    September 11‚ 2013 Psychological Egoism Psychological Egoism is the position that the ultimate motive of all actions is selfish. It is not the position that everyone should be motivated by selfish desires‚ but rather that they are motivated by selfish desires. This is supposed to be a psychological fact of human motivations. Joel Feinberg presents a multitude of arguments against psychological egoistic hedonism. There are four “arguments” which support psychological egoism: (a) “Every action of mine

    Premium Love Marriage Family

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ethical egoism is the normative theory that the promotion of one’s own good is in accordance with morality. In the strong version‚ it is held that it is always moral to promote one’s own good‚ and it is never moral not to promote it. In the weak version‚ it is said that although it is always moral to promote one’s own good‚ it is not necessarily never moral to not. That is‚ there may be conditions in which the avoidance of personal interest may be a moral action. In an imaginary construction

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50