Chapter 17: Virtue Ethics 17.3 I agree with Aristotle’s argument and conclusion that being virtuous person contributes so much to someone’s life with regards to going well. The reason for this is that our ultimate goal ought to be self-sufficient. That is; Aristotle believed that the good of something should not be limited to instrumental values e.g. money and fame. The goal of life‚ according to Aristotle‚ should be about self-sufficiency‚ which means that a person needs to possess it all and make
Premium Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics is a theory used to make moral decisions. It does not rely on religion‚ society or culture; it only depends on the individuals themselves. Aristotle is the main philosopher of Virtue Ethic. Aristotle’s writings have been read more or less continuously since ancient times‚ and his ethical treatises continue to influence philosophers working today. Virtue‚ according to Aristotle‚ is equivalent to excellence (Hutchinson‚ 41). A man has virtue as a guitarist‚ for instance‚ if he plays
Premium Virtue Ethics
When we talk about whether or not a person is ethically right‚ we can look at the actions that he or she may partake in. These actions maybe studied in different situations such as the one that we were told to evaluate. While leaving the grocery store‚ one witnesses an old man struggling with his oxygen tank. Without thinking‚ you lift the tank and help the elderly man. This action is a kind gesture‚ but would we consider this a moral act? One could analyze this situation with two different ethical
Premium Ethics Thought Virtue
a cause for a ticket in the situation. When using rule utilitarianism an officer would have to take into consideration if all of society was allowed to speed excessively over the posted limit. If an individual decided to speed in a school zone then that would warrant a ticket in most cases. It is hard to keep everyone happy all the time. This can be a problem in using utilitarianism with decision making. Another issue is that utilitarianism disregards the action committed‚ rather than taking it
Premium Morality Ethics Law
PHIL310 – Ethics Essay #2 – Theme: Core Ethical Theories The two ‘core’ ethical theories covered in class that I started to assess are the categorical imperative and utilitarianism‚ both of which offer an approach to decision making in the context of social and interpersonal relationships. In this with in depth understanding of both that Kantian ethics is much easily appreciated than the ethics of utilitarianism as Kantian ethics apply to everyone yet both ethical approaches lead to faults.
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant
Introduction Using Deontological ethics this assignment will discuss personal experiences involving business ethical problems. I will draw from Kant’s categorical imperative to describe the situation‚ confrontation‚ and implications present throughout the problem. Not long ago‚ my wife and I both wanted to earn extra income. After brainstorming several business ideas‚ we decided on creating a small home-based business focusing on candy. At the time my wife worked for a fortune 500 company and
Premium Deontological ethics Ethics Immanuel Kant
What are the challenges to the relativist position? Which one resonates with you most and why? The challenges one faces when supporting the relativist position are complex and variable‚ as there is no fine line that is applicable to all situations as a whole. The reasoning behind this is due to different cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds‚ which often represent different morals‚ values‚ ethics‚ and belief systems. All of those attribute and further point to the subjectivity and controversial
Premium Morality Ethics
Philosopher Robert Louden presented a criticism of virtue ethics. Rather than arguing that virtue ethics as a moral theory is wrong‚ Louden argues that the agent-centeredness of values ethics fails to provide adequate guidance for the action of the agent‚ thereby making the theory useless and disregardable. Louden’s first criticism is that virtue ethics does not allow for actions to be viewed separately from the agent (Louden‚ 228). This focus on virtues and not actions result poses a problem when assessing
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant
Virtue Ethics- Even though Billy did have too much to drink‚ that does not excuse him from going home and having sex with a woman he just met while he is in a relationship. While being a close friend to both people‚ Billy and Suzie‚ and knowing that I can’t stop him‚ it is my loyal and moral duty to act in a just and kind way which is to tell Suzie. A Virtue Ethics person would suggest that the right thing to do is look at an angelic person. A truthful friend that that doesn’t lie in order to make
Premium Love Marriage Morality
Analyse the key features of Virtue Ethics Virtue ethics is a custom which goes back to Plato and Aristotle; it is also known as aretaic ethics‚ from the Greek word arête meaning excellence or virtue. There are a number of key features to virtue ethics‚ one of the most significant being that it is an agent-centered theory rather than act-centered theory. Therefore it asks the questions ‘What sort of person ought I to be?’ rather than ‘How ought I to act’. The concept does not focus on actions being
Premium Ethics Virtue Morality