circumstances‚ (2) to lead the claimant reasonably to rely on those assurances or conduct; (3) by acting significantly to his detriment‚ so that it would be unconscionable for the defendant to deny him any remedy.” (Per Hayton and Mitchell: ‘Commentary and cases on the law of Trust and Equitable Remedies’‚ 13th edition‚ Sweet and Maxwell‚ page 78) Critically analyse and evaluate this statement in light of recent developments in the law of proprietary estoppel. Despite the lack of a definitive formulation
Premium Law Contract Common law
In earlier days‚ agreement was built on a very classic and simple basis: it is concluded at the moment that the acceptance of an offer takes place and that is all. In consequence‚ equal parties were non-existent and stronger parties had the possibility to impose unfair and domineering conditions upon those who were weak and vulnerable. It is in this context that both legislations and courts agreed that State action was indispensable to ensure fairness among individual parties
Premium Contract
Differences between Federal and State Courts There are often good reasons to choose federal court over state court‚ or state court over federal court. Here are some of the considerations that lawyers and clients weigh when deciding one court over the other. The list is not all inclusive. Existence of Jurisdiction. Whether there is jurisdiction in either or both of the courts. Federal jurisdiction requires either a federal question and sometime a minimum dollar amount at issue or that there by
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
AB1301 Business Law 2012/13 Semester 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3: OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE ........................................................................................... 1 3.1 Offer ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Acceptance ................................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 Electronic
Premium Contract Contract law
PROJECT REPORT ON BIOPIRACY AND ROLE OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NAGOYA PROTOCOL RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LAW‚ PUNJAB‚ PATIALA SUBMITTED IN partial fulfilment of the requirement for paper vi‚ B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) SIXTH semester on private international law‚ april‚ 2013 Submitted to: Submitted by- GROUP VII MS. IVNEET WALIA SHELLY MITTAL (503) (ASSISSTANT
Premium Choice of law Arbitration Law
company entered in the Commercial Register of Basle‚ but US government thought the company had a connection with Germany. Switzerland claimed there is no German involvement. The US raised the concern of Switzerland’s failure to exhaust the local remedies. Switzerland contended that the proceedings at the local court in the US were based on Trading with the Enemy Act 1917. Switzerland wants assets of Interhandel release and wants the court to declare US to submit this dispute to arbitration based
Premium United States United States Declaration of Independence
apply in all states‚ including those in which the laws have not been adopted. ANSWER: FALSE 3. A state law that conflicts with the U.S. Constitution will be deemed unconstitutional. ANSWER: TRUE 4. Damages is a remedy at law. ANSWER: TRUE 5. Equitable remedies include injunctions and decrees of specific performance. ANSWER: TRUE 6. How the courts interpret a statute determines how that statute is applied. ANSWER: TRUE 7. Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never
Premium Tort Contract Reasonable person
The law has had great difficulty in classifying and protecting each individual’s apparent rights to privacy. The courts have been faced with the difficult tasks of defining what privacy encompasses for each individual and then balancing this against the values of society. The common law has recently begun to develop through judgements handed down in such countries as the United States‚ United Kingdom and New Zealand‚ placing pressure upon Australian courts to follow their lead. Cases such as Lenah
Free Common law Law Privacy
On behalf of Rylem‚ I am pleased to offer you employment with our company. This letter sets forth the proposed terms of your employment with our company. 1. Employment Agency. As you know‚ we are a temporary employment agency. You will be paid only for hours worked when on an assignment at a Rylem client‚ as evidenced by a time card certified by us and our client. All timecards will require an approval unless otherwise agreed to by us or the client. A lack of approval may cause a delay in payroll
Premium Employment
Paper. [Accessed 12 November 2013]. Hoekman‚ B. (2011). Changing Developing Country Trade Policies and WTO Engagement. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. [Accessed 12 November 2013]. Horlick‚ G. (2013). Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies: Experiences of the Most Active WTO Members edited by M"usl"um Yilmaz Cambridge: Cambridge University Press‚ 2013. World Trade Review‚ 12 (04)‚ pp. 746--754. [Accessed 12 November 2013]. Magariños‚ C.‚ Long‚ Y. and Sercovich‚ F. (2002). China in
Premium World Trade Organization