the breach of contract by Harold. I will focus in my discussion bellow that whether the agreement is constituted or not by the offer from Harold and its acceptance by Lisa. Therefore I am assuming that there was an agreement between them and what remedy could be claimed by Lisa if Harold breach of it. First I need to check is there any valid contract between Lisa and Harold or not? For this I need to consider the elements of a valid contract which are as bellows; Agreement Consideration Intention
Premium Contract Tort Common law
contract. For example‚ under certain circumstances‚ false statements or promises made by a seller of goods regarding the quality or nature of the product that the seller has may constitute misrepresentation. A finding of misrepresentation allows for a remedy of rescission and sometimes damages depending on the type of misrepresentation. According to Gordon v Selico (1986) 18 HLR 219 it is possible to make a misrepresentation either by words or by conduct‚ although not everything said or done is capable
Premium Misrepresentation Contract Contract law
1. Which of the following is not an essential element of a Contract of Sale? a. Consent b. Subject Matter c. Delivery d. Price 2. What is the effect when all the three (3) elements of a valid contract of sale are present but there is a defect or illegality constituting any of such elements? a. Contract is Void. b. Contract is Voidable. c. Contract is Unenforceable d. Contract is Rescissible. 3. It takes place upon the concurrence of the essential elements
Premium Contract Contract law
BRIEF SUMMARY OF CASE FACTS Who: James Keegstra was a high school teacher known for his promotion of anti-Semitic beliefs. Keegstra integrated his personal beliefs into his curriculum‚ teaching his students that Jewish people were responsible for various societal issues and promoting conspiracy theories about them. What: Charged with promoting hatred against an identifiable group (Jewish people) under Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. Where: Alberta‚ Canada‚ in the town of Olds. When:
Premium
MOSK GIVES US MOORE OF AN IDEA ABOUT PROPERTY Contents MOSK GIVES US MOORE OF AN IDEA ABOUT PROPERTY 2 INTRODUCTION 3 PROPERTY DEFINITION 4 ADAPTABILITY 5 LEGISLATIVE GUIDANCE 6 ETHICS AND EQUITY 7 WEAKNESSES OR STRENGTHS? 10 POST ‘MOORE’TEM 13 CONCLUSION 14 INTRODUCTION The question of property rights in human tissue has traditionally been relevant in matters concerning dead bodies. However‚ with the rise of Biotechnology human tissue storage is increasing rapidly
Premium Property Law Property law
Specific performance is a court ordered remedy in response to a breach in contract. (Clark‚ 2010) The remedy enforces the breaching party to carry out the contract originally agreed. The specific performance was appropriate in this case as the judge found that a binding contract had been formed between the parties‚ a specific
Premium Jury Law Court
Introduction: Magill v Magill was an appeal to the High Court of Australia in the Tort of Deceit. There had been no precedence on the Tort of Deceit in terms of paternity fraud in Australian jurisdiction‚ and questions were raised regarding the imposition of law and legislation in a marital context and whether the tort of deceit extends beyond the commercial context. The appeal was unanimously dismissed‚ and the decision became legally binding in all other Australian courts. Material Facts:
Premium Law
or the proletariat‚ lacks any effective means of having just recompense for their hard labor. The remedy for this trouble‚ in Karl Marx’s view‚ was for the proletariat to revolt and create a new social order where there would be no distinction between segments of society; there would be no classes as such. Collective ownership of all capital for production would ensure‚ Marx suggested‚ an equitable distribution of wealth. While Adam Smith contended that the most ideal economic system is capitalism
Premium Karl Marx Capitalism Economics
Classification of Contracts (7 – 1.30) Simple and formal contracts A formal contract is a written contract (such as a deed). A simple contract can be entirely orally or a combination of oral and written. Bilateral Contract: exchange of promise – one promise for another (a promisee’s promise in return for the promisor’s promise or vice versa) o Union Dominions Trust (Commercial) Ltd v Eagle Aircraft Services Ltd [1968] 1 All ER 104 at 108‚ Lord Diplock Unilateral Contract:
Premium Contract
.................................................................................................. 9 THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD ..................................................................... 11 SCOPE OF “SAFETY ZONE” REQUIRED TO PASS EQUITABLE AND CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER................................................ 14 CHARACTERISTICS OF IDAHO GANGS ............................................................. 16 POSSIBLE MORE EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES .................................
Premium Gang Injunction