CONTRACTS ASSIGNMENT UNCONSCIONABLE BARGAINS SUBMITTED BY: KARAN SHANKAR IV Semester‚ SVKM’s Pravin Gandhi College Of Law‚ Mumbai 01 Index of authorities 03 02 Introduction 05 03 Research Methodology 07 04 Chapters 08 05 Chapters (cont) 15 06 Conclusion 17 07
Premium Common law Contract
References: Peter Birks (1999). "Equity‚ conscience‚ and unjust enrichment" (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MULR/1999/1.html). Melbourne University Law Review
Premium Contract Trust law Common law
Chapter 2: List for Basic Rules of Trusts: Property‚ Obligations and trusts 1) Equitable title exists whenever equity will require the legal owner of property to hold the property for the benefit of some other person or group of persons (which group may include the legal owner himself.) 2) Cestuis que trust=beneficiaries 3) Settlor and trustee can be the same person. 4) Settlor and beneficiary can be the same person. (Settlor can convey property to a trustee on trust for himself.) 5) Express
Free Property Property law Trust law
there was no actual earmarking or physical segregation of the wine sold to different customers. The wine company became insolvent‚ and the receiver claimed that all the wine still belonged to the company – a claim that was upheld. 3. The rules of equity cannot provide a solution to this problem. There is no room in sale of goods law for the notion that an equitable title might pass or an equitable interest be created‚ however well established
Premium Ownership Property Property law
| Contents | Page No: | 1. | List of Authorites (Cases & Statutes) | 2 | 2. | Answers (Mainbody & Conclusion) | 3-10 | List of Authorities: Cases : 1. Crabb v Arun 2. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Tress House Ltd 3. Ramsden v Ryson 4. Willmott v Barber 5. Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co. Ltd 6. Matharu v Matharu 7. Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Trustees Co 8. Gillet v Holt 9. Dillwyn v Llewellyn
Premium Property Common law Real property
the time of the original shares and the cost of the original shares will be spread over all the shares. See s.130-20 Seminar reflection Value-shifting is a result of a transaction between two parties that is not at market value‚ the value of an equity or loan interest is increased
Premium Lease Trust law Stock market
Now we turn to discuss the case study. I hope everyone have already done it. The main issue of the case study is that Chu has been the New South Wales (NSW) Operations Manager for Computers Pty Ltd. Due to Chu’s senior position knows the identity and requirements of the company’s major clients. In March 2007‚ Chu decides to retire and agrees to not compete against the company in NSW for two years. However in April 2007‚ Systems Pty Ltd actively solicits business from the customers of Computers Pty
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Contract
Elizabeth Covington‚ who was sixty-five years old when her husband died‚ needed as much money as she could muster‚ decided to have a garage sale. Her husband had a baseball card collection but Elizabeth knew nothing about baseball or baseball cards. She displayed the cards along with many other items. Michael Ferrell‚ and eighteen year old‚ who lived in the neighborhood‚ attended the sale. What caught his eye was the baseball card collection and‚ specifically what appeared to be a 1952 Topps Mickey
Premium Baseball
Describe the remedies available for breach of contract When signing a contract not only are you agreeing to the terms of this contract you are agreeing to the consequences if breach the contract. There are many remedies available if one of the party’s breaches the contract and if the party who breached the contract doesn’t agree to the consequences then the matter will be taken to court. A breach of contract can be defined as a party failing to perform‚ precisely and exactly‚ his obligations under
Premium Contract Judicial remedies Injunction
stated‚ “it is impossible to define‚ and difficult even to describe‚ at what point at which the influence becomes‚ in the eye of law‚ undue.” The doctrine of undue influence has been agreed upon as “the ground of relief developed by the courts of equity as a court of conscience.” It is an ordinary behaviour to influence individuals and persuade them to enter into transactions. However‚ the aim is to ensure that the influence exercised is not abused. On the grounds of these concepts‚ it is impossible
Premium Common law Contract