Now we turn to discuss the case study. I hope everyone have already done it. The main issue of the case study is that Chu has been the New South Wales (NSW) Operations Manager for Computers Pty Ltd. Due to Chu’s senior position knows the identity and requirements of the company’s major clients. In March 2007‚ Chu decides to retire and agrees to not compete against the company in NSW for two years. However in April 2007‚ Systems Pty Ltd actively solicits business from the customers of Computers Pty
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Contract
Elizabeth Covington‚ who was sixty-five years old when her husband died‚ needed as much money as she could muster‚ decided to have a garage sale. Her husband had a baseball card collection but Elizabeth knew nothing about baseball or baseball cards. She displayed the cards along with many other items. Michael Ferrell‚ and eighteen year old‚ who lived in the neighborhood‚ attended the sale. What caught his eye was the baseball card collection and‚ specifically what appeared to be a 1952 Topps Mickey
Premium Baseball
Describe the remedies available for breach of contract When signing a contract not only are you agreeing to the terms of this contract you are agreeing to the consequences if breach the contract. There are many remedies available if one of the party’s breaches the contract and if the party who breached the contract doesn’t agree to the consequences then the matter will be taken to court. A breach of contract can be defined as a party failing to perform‚ precisely and exactly‚ his obligations under
Premium Contract Judicial remedies Injunction
stated‚ “it is impossible to define‚ and difficult even to describe‚ at what point at which the influence becomes‚ in the eye of law‚ undue.” The doctrine of undue influence has been agreed upon as “the ground of relief developed by the courts of equity as a court of conscience.” It is an ordinary behaviour to influence individuals and persuade them to enter into transactions. However‚ the aim is to ensure that the influence exercised is not abused. On the grounds of these concepts‚ it is impossible
Premium Common law Contract
Introduction The paper aims to discuss the comprehensive and significant findings of the topic that is whether the duties of constructive trustee have been equated with the expressive trustee. The paper will highlight both the trustees in a detailed discussion. This discussion will bring differentiation between both aspects. The paper will also aim to distinguish circumstances surrounding the statutory direction of courts when imposing a constructive trust upon a trustee de son tort. Constructive
Premium Trust law Trustee Fiduciary
Introduction: As a rule of any contract‚ it is bound to the terms and conditions. As the contract circumstances are limited‚ the person is bound to sign the contract on someone else’s behalf. However there are many expectations that invalidate a contract which relates to the contract conscionability which confirms to be conscience. Unlike Unconscionable means unfair or unjust. In any law of a contract it means that the contract or the terms and conditions are unjust that the court will be forced
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
created can grow itself by her skill and her story will bring her more customer (Bygrave & Zacharakis ‚ 2010‚ p.80). Therefore‚ the thing Alison is lacking of is just time being. Question 4:Dicuss her funding-raisin and valuation. If you were an equity investor‚ what return expectations would you have ?
Premium Management Retailing Business
Page 1 ICLR: Chancery Division/1949/CANNON v. HARTLEY. - [1949] Ch. 213 [1949] Ch. 213 [CHANCERY DIVISION] CANNON v. HARTLEY. 1948 Nov. 19‚ 22. ROMRE J. Settlement - Deed of separation - Covenant to settle after-acquired property - Breach of covenant Volunteer’s right to claim for damages. A volunteer who is a party to a deed and a direct covenantee thereunder is entitled to damages for breach of a covenant contained in the deed. By a deed of separation made on January 23‚ 1941‚ between the defendant
Premium Marriage Trust law Husband
Carapace: Melee Mk 2 → 5 UpperLimb Fiber: All Purpose Mk 2 → 3 Ferrous Fiber: AllPurpose Mk 2 → 3 Hawkshadow – Galeforce Lvl. 1 353 UpperLimb Armor: Melee → 5 Exhaust Manifold: TType I → 3 [24] Winged Exoskeleton: TType I → 1 [24] Note: [] Brackets denote whether the item is available as a reward within a mission. Lvl. 2 410 Will’O Tank: Melee Mk 1 → 3 (Code 2 Exam) (23) Exhaust Manifold: TType I → 3 [24] Talon Unit: TType I → 1 Lvl. 3 461 Will’O Tank: Melee Mk 2 → 3 (34) (45)
Premium Promissory note
ZAMBIAN OPEN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW COMPUTER No. 21110141 LARRY HORE NJUNGU BACHELOR OF LAWS (LLB) COURSE: CONTRACT LAW (LL 12) LECTURER: GREENWELL LYEMPE ASSIGNMENT No. 2 SECOND YEAR‚ 2ND SEMESTER MOBILE: 0977 666160 CONTACT ADDRESS: PLOT 3601/4‚ MAPEPE ROAD‚ OLYMPIA PARK‚ LUSAKA TASKS: (i) Purpose of contractual remedies and whether they serve their intended objective (ii) Relationship between agency and principal (ii) Misrepresentation
Premium Contract Common law Breach of contract