ITM LAW SCHOOL‚ COURT ROOM EXERCISE [pic] [pic] [pic] IN THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE MATTER OF AN. Roy‚ Commissioner of Police Vs. Suresh Sham Singh [pic] WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE APELLANT [pic] MOST RESPECTFULLY
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Magistrate Mumbai
Know About 3 Interrogation Techniques That Could Be Used On You By The Police When you are being held due to suspicion of a crime‚ it’s very possible that you will be interrogated by the police. Their goal will be to get information out of you about the crime‚ or even have you confess to it. While you have the right to remain silent until your attorney arrives‚ it is good to know some possible interrogation techniques that the police could use on you. Lying To You One misconception about the police
Premium Police Crime Criminal law
MARYLAND v. GARRISON 480 U.S. 79 (1987) FACTS: The Baltimore City Police department obtained a warrant to search the home of Lawrence McWebb located “third floor of 2036 Park Avenue” for controlled substances and related paraphernalia. The police believed that there was only one apartment on the third floor‚ which in fact there were actually 2; one belonging to Garrison (defendant) and McWebb‚ the person listed on the warrant. Upon entering and searching the apartment‚ officers found drugs and
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Constable Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Gail Atwater was pulled over for not putting a seatbelt on her child. Standard procedure would be to give Gail a minor misdemeanor but instead the officer arrested her. The court defended that Atwater did not prove that any constitutional rights had been broken. The 4th amendment was the right being broken in this case. In the 4th amendment “Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Law
Good versus Evil‚ what makes a person good‚ what makes a person evil. This question has been debated for years by philosophers‚ politicians or just about any common debate. People say well someone like Hitler‚ he is evil and someone like Martin Luther King Jr. is good. Someone who supported thought him as a good person. To people who were against black rights thought Martin Luther to be bad. So this debate of good and evil can never be won because there are always two sides to the argument. Another
Premium Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ILLINOIS * Justin King- Plaintiff * v. * Anheuser-Busch‚ INC- Defendant * PLAINTIFF’S INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT TO: Defendant Truck Driver BY: Plaintiff Plaintiff‚ by and through his attorney‚ requests that the defendant answer the following Interrogatories fully‚ under oath and in accordance with the
Premium Jury Civil procedure Criminal law
Phillip Zimbardo. A Pirandellian Prison. New York Times Magazine‚ 4/8/73 The quiet of a summer morning in Palo Alto‚ California was shattered by a screeching squad car siren as police swept through the city picking up college students in a surprise mass arrest. Each suspect was charged with a felony‚ warned of his constitutional rights‚ spread-eagled against the car‚ searched‚ handcuffed and carted off in the back seat of the squad car to the police station for booking. After fingerprinting
Premium Police English-language films Crime
How does a court determine if the confession or statement given by an individual if voluntary or not. Will in the United States of America a confession is admissible if only a judge deems it to be and also deems it to be a voluntary statement of voluntary confession. The United States Supreme court was the first to exclude confessions procured and introduced in the states in criminal cases concluding that admissions of confessions would than violate due process. This rule is grounded into three principles
Premium Jury Law Miranda v. Arizona
who is trapped on an island with his daughter Miranda. Prospero used to be the Duke of Milan; he is a magician and controls the spirit Ariel. Ariel was once enslaved to Sycorax how died but her son Caliban is alive. Caliban is part human part beast and he is Prospero’s slave. Prospero has different relationships with each of the characters‚ so he talks to them differently. Miranda and Prospero enter for the first time in the second scene. Miranda is asking Prospero whether he started the storm
Premium The Tempest William Shakespeare Greek mythology
that focused on non-criminal activities. There are many types of police discretion. The functions of a patrol division of a police department could be easy and challenging. There are different reasons why Miranda v. Arizona was an important court case in relationship to the police. The Miranda v. Arizona case changed things in Law enforcement. The quality of life initiative was policing that was utilized In New York by Mayor Giuliani and his administration around the nineties. (incite-national
Premium Police Law Criminal law