1. Explain the rationale behind the Miranda decision. The rationale behind Miranda decision is police officers are required to inform defendants their constitutional rights before or during arrest. Police officers also need to communicate certain constitutional laws protecting the defendant prior to arrest‚ interrogation‚ or interviewing. 2. Do you believe the Miranda warning is still a valid concept? Why? In my opinion i strongly believe Miranda warning is still a valid concept due to the fact
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Police Law
Miranda vs. Arizona: This case had to do with an Ernest Miranda who raped a Patty McGee*. After extracting a written confession from the rapist about the situation‚ Miranda’s lawyer argued that it was not valid since the Phoenix Police Department failed to read Miranda his rights‚ also in violation of the Sixth Amendment which is the right to counsel. Some factors that helped support Miranda’s arguments were that the suspect had requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with a lawyer;
Premium Miranda v. Arizona United States Constitution Police
In June of 1966‚ the outcome of the trial - Miranda v. Arizona declared that suspects must be informed of their specific legal rights when being placed under arrest‚ bringing about the creation of the Miranda Rights and forever altering all criminal arrests and police conduct. The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. In each of these cases‚ the defendant was questioned by police officers‚ detectives‚ or a prosecuting attorney
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Police
On June 13th‚ 1966‚ the Supreme Court announced its 5-4 ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case. This ruling established “Miranda Rights‚” a standard police procedure which revolves around the principle that an arresting officer must advise a criminal suspect of his or her rights before being taken into custody and interrogated. The Court’s ruling in this landmark case effectively reinforced the importance of ensuring that the accused are aware of their Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment guarantees
Premium Crime Police Miranda v. Arizona
interrogated. These words are referred to as the Miranda Rights or Miranda Warnings. The Miranda Rights are used to inform people who have been accused of a crime about their rights before they are questioned. Reading people a very specific script describing their rights ensures that they are informed of how their words can be used and how they may protect themselves by remaining silent or waiting for an attorney before speaking. Since Miranda v. Arizona‚ Miranda Warnings have become a vital form of protection
Premium Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona
1 Miranda Warnings Kaplan University Police Operations CJ: 211 September 14‚ 2013 2 Miranda warnings were created to protect individuals and their rights against coercive or threatening questioning methods by police officers from Miranda Warning.org(2013). Everyone has heard the “you have the right to remain silent” speech‚ so on and so forth. These rights do not just apply to adults but juveniles as well
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Police Law
The Miranda rights are the rights a police offer is required to say to someone when the officer arrests that person. It is the warning that officers of the law give suspects so they know about their rights before they are interrogated. It was a law made after the conclusions of the Miranda vs. Arizona case. The case was very close as it was a 5-4 decision. The court ruled that any type of evidence‚ whether it is incriminating or proof of innocence‚ can be used as evidence in a case; however it
Premium Arrest Crime Police
Contention 1- The majority does not perform the greatest ability to protect all members of a society. In the case of Miranda v Arizona‚ the courts had to decide whether or not a man was deprived of his freedoms while in police custody. Basically Miranda v Arizona completely changed the way police apprehend and interrogate suspects. However it was not only Miranda‚ but many other instances where the majority has not protected all minorities. Vignera v New York was another similar instance where
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Police
Police procedures before and after Miranda v Arizona Name Professor Course Date Before the establishment of Miranda rights‚ the only requirement was that the concessions by the suspects had to be voluntary. This requirement posed issues such as the suspect challenging confessions during trial on grounds that at the time the suspect was under duress. The Miranda rights protect individual’s rights by ensuring that they are aware of the consequences of what they say while they are in police custody
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Police Law
or against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney now or at any time during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney‚ one will be appointed to represent you‚ without cost‚ by the courts” (“Miranda v. Arizona.” West n.p.). There are several reasons why the Miranda laws are necessary in the United States. First‚ most people who would be interrogated by police would not necessarily be aware of their rights unless they are told what they are. The goal of the police would be to
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Law Police