The BCG Matrix is a method used by businesses to identify market growth and market shares for organizations. It was developed by Bruce Henderson of the Boston Consultant’s Group in the early 1970s. To establish long term value creation‚ a company should have a portfolio of products that contain both high growth products in need of cash inputs and low growth products that generate a lot of cash and use this information to improve it. The basic idea behind it is that the bigger the market share a product
Premium Marketing Strategic management
The BCG Matrix has a few different names. It is also called the Growth-Share Matrix‚ Portfolio Analysis‚ and The Boston Matrix. Management consultants at the Boston Consulting Group developed their matrix in the early 1970s. They designed it to help managers at large corporations decide which business units they should invest in Mindtools.com‚ 2014). So‚ which areas of the business deserve more resources and investment? The BCG Matrix consists of four categories based on the growth rate of the industry
Premium Strategic management
BCG Matrix Product Relative Market Share Market Growth Classification Note D 2 Leader 3% Low Cash Cow Generates more cash than needed to maintain business. Requires frequent “milking” and very little investment. A 3 Leader 20% High Star Requires a high level of funding to battle competitors and maintain growth rate. When industry slows‚ has potential to become cash cow if market share is retained. C 1 Co-Leader 25% High C 1 Co-Leader 25% High Question Mark Potential to gain market share and
Premium Marketing Stock market Strategic management
organisation (‚ 2006). This paper discusses the contributions of the Ansoff Matrix in strategic marketing management. There are different types of strategies used by business in identifying their market. There is the SWOT Analysis‚ in which it identifies the strengths‚ Weaknesses‚ Opportunities and Threats of the target market. Another is the BCG Product Portfolio Matrix which is used by businesses with multiple portfolios or product lines in examining the products through relative market shares
Premium Marketing
environmental factors 1.2 Compare and contrast a minimum of two tools such as SWOT and POWER SWOT and apply to business solutions 1.3 Critically contrast Primary and Secondary research methods 2.1 Evaluate the use of tools such as Boston and Ansoff Matrix to business situations 2.2 Analyse the effectiveness of models such as Porter’s Generic Strategies 3.1 Evaluate consumer buying behaviour and the adoption process 3.2 Analyse the role of marketing mix to specific products 3.3 Evaluate the Product
Premium Marketing
evaluate the performance of the managed portfolio over the investment period‚ from the 12th March to the 11th of May 2012 being a period of nine trading weeks. This portfolio performance evaluation report is prepared to determine whether the portfolio had any abnormal performance and this could be done by better market timing as well as good stock selections by investors‚ by being able to identify whether the stock is over-performed or under-performed. My portfolio will be assessed in terms of breath
Premium Investment
Chapter 19 Portfolio Selection Chapter 19 Charles P. Jones‚ Investments: Analysis and Management‚ Eighth Edition‚ John Wiley & Sons Prepared by G.D. Koppenhaver‚ Iowa State University Portfolio Selection • Diversification is key to optimal risk management • Analysis required because of the infinite number of portfolios of risky assets • How should investors select the best risky portfolio? • How could riskless assets be used? Building a Portfolio • Step 1: Use the Markowitz portfolio selection
Premium Investment Risk Risk aversion
complementary goods‚ envisaging the processes that bring a commodity to the final product market. The sector matrix analysis mentioned by Froud (2006) fills these limitations; it constructs the demand side in terms of complementary and competing demands made by end users‚ and the supply side in terms of corporate consolidation of surplus from different activities inside and outside a specific demand matrix. Taking into account the weaknesses of Porter and Gereffi’sframework‚ Froud argues a need to abandon
Premium Automobile Ford Motor Company
Mini Case 1: Portfolio Construction Exercise Download the spreadsheet minicase1_data.xls from the class website. In it you will find the time series of monthly returns for Microsoft (MSFT)‚ General Motors (GM) from January 1990 to December 2002. Answer the following questions based on the data in the spreadsheet. Note that you do not need to turn in your entire spreadsheet; Simply summarize your answers (show all formulae where appropriate) on a few sheets of paper. Please highlight your
Premium Variance Standard deviation Investment
UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI PROJECT ON PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. SUBMITTED BY SHUBHANGI S. ADENKAR. PROJECT GUIDE MRS. MINAL GANDHI. BACHELOR OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES SEMESTER V (2009-10) V.E.S. COLLEGE OF ARTS‚ SCIENCE & COMMERCE‚ SINDHI COLONY‚ CHEMBUR – 400071 1 UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI PROJECT ON PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT. Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements For the Award of the Degree of Bachelor of Management By SHUBHANGI. S. ADENKAR. PROJECT GUIDE MRS. MINAL
Premium Investment Investment management