Example Response 1 to Ethical Dilemma 1 A review of Ethical Dilemma # 1 presents several issues to consider; the first being the counselor’s initial decision to meet with John‚ sans Phyllis. Section 3.05 of the American Psychological Association’s (APA) Ethical Standards defines a multiple relationship as one that “occurs when a psychologist is in a professional role with a person and (1) at the same time is in another role with the same person . . .” (2002). The mere act of meeting with
Premium Ethics Family therapy Business ethics
My personal ethical lens is rights and responsibilities and relationship lens. This indicates that I use my reasoning skills to determine both the universal rules that each person should follow and the processes that will assure fairness and justice for all in the community. My strength is to know what to do and do it. Once it is said that I will do something or care for someone‚ that is what I do. Loyalty and consistency is valued. My weakness is the risk of being an autocratic. An autocratic is
Premium Critical thinking Thought Ethics
Ethical egoism Explanation of the theory This moral theory states that everyone should act in their own self-interest. Even though we can act in the interests of others‚ we should always act only in our own interests. Ethical egoist may help their friends if they believe there is a long-term payoff or benefit doing so. One’s self-interest is often best followed by allowing others to pursue their self-interest as well. Sacrificing one’s short-term self-interest in order to maximize one’s long-term
Premium Ethical egoism Individualism Egoism
Ethical Guidelines for Observational Studies Observational Research‚ Audits and Related Activities December 2006 Ethical Guidelines for Observational Studies: Observational Research‚ Audits and Related Activities Citation: National Ethics Advisory Committee. 2006. Ethical Guidelines for Observational Studies: Observational research‚ audits and related activities. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Published in December 2006 by the Ministry of Health PO Box 5013‚ Wellington‚ New Zealand
Premium Health care Epidemiology Ethics
Ethical Perspective Ethical perspectives and styles vary among individuals. All types of ethical decisions‚ personal and business‚ are based on individual ethical perspectives and styles. The four prominent categories of ethical philosophy consist of character/virtue‚ obligation/deontology‚ results/utilitarianism‚ and equity/relativism. These ethical perspectives‚ when assessed correctly‚ can provide insight into general views and approaches used in making personal and business decisions. Character
Premium Ethics Morality
Ethical Theories from different prospectives Robin Picciano Colorado Technical University PHIL 101-1403B-02 When dealing with ethics‚ there are many different theories that apply to what is right or wrong‚ and also what people should or should not do. All because something may seem or feel right for one person it may not always apply to another person or people in the society. Many people have their own beliefs and values as a person or while involving a society (Mackinnon
Premium Morality Ethics
Business Ethics Assignment 1 Ali Tamimi 92200049 1. What is Ed’s ethical dilemma ? I Believe the definition of ethical is related to our behaviour and the decisions we make and if they are considered right or wrong by society. I am sure there are times when a situation may be perfectly legal but we may not think it is okay. Keeping this in mind‚ Ed’s ethical issues include thoroughly paying procurement people out for dinner from the firms money and paying for golf games‚ although it
Premium Ethics Business ethics
MODULE 4 DQ 2 Nurses and Physicians deal with many ethical issues on a daily basis. The basic ethical principles assist us in understanding‚ negotiating and navigating these issues. Ethical dilemmas arise when two or more ethical principles apply in a particular case and would lead to different outcomes. Looking at the difference between between beneficence and Non-maleficence as follows: Beneficence: Compassion; taking positive action to help others; desire to do good; core principle of our
Premium Ethics Patient
Columbia that ultimately led to its conviction? The Chiquita Company was accused of sponsoring the terrorist organizations named AUC. The company annually paid AUC a huge amount of money. Finally‚ this huge amount of power was transferred to the weapons being used by the terrorists to kill innocent civilians. It was highly unethical because any payment to the terrorists would be regarded as sponsoring the terrorists. Additionally‚ the company was claiming the purpose of making such a payment was to protect
Premium Ethics Banana Morality
Communication challenges with key stakeholders while maintaining ethical‚ legal‚ and professional standards encompass a broad set of principles. One of the most important factors being the personal information protection act‚ as it governs privacy legislation that guides the collection‚ use‚ and disclosure of personal information. This plays a large role in the communication aspect of an organization‚ and defines what can be shared‚ what personal information is collected‚ the conduction of privacy
Premium Ethics Business ethics Employment