The ethical situation surrounding the decision to launch the space shuttle Challenger in January 1986 involved the highest level of management at three space centers: Kennedy Space Center in Florida‚ Johnson Space Center in Houston‚ and the Marshall Space Flight Center. Management and engineers with Morton Thiokol‚ a NASA contractor that manufactured the solid booster rockets‚ also joined these discussions that resulted in catastrophic failure. Launch discussions took place throughout the day and
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger
The ethical dilemma is to explain to Mr. Ostacolo that Sam has always had an interest in physical activity‚ but because he is only mobile in a wheelchair‚ he has been denied many opportunities to pursue such interests. Most importantly‚ Sam wants the community center to organize and run a wheelchair basketball league. As for the community center‚ they refuse to allow Sam to play and do not have any money for a wheelchair basketball league. In this case‚ I do believe the deontological theory works
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
is reluctant in telling his partner or practicing protective sex. The client is angry and indicated that he even considers deliberately infecting other potential partners. Dilemma 1) Reluctance to advise partner 2) Reluctance to practice safe sex 3) Deliberate intention to infect others Working through ethical dilemma to find management strategies that are ethically and legally defendable and justifiable; I) Public Health Act a. GP is mandatory reporter‚ and this act would allow the health
Premium Ethics Sexual intercourse HIV
1. Succinctly name & summarize the ethical dilemma(s) in your group assignment. Include pertinent medical facts‚ the patient’s‚ family’s‚ or other stakeholder’s expressed preferences (to the extent known) and the contextual features of the clinical scenario for the patient/family/stakeholder(s). How did these interconnect? Which of these most influenced your decision-making and that of the group? In this case‚ Laurie De Soto‚ a 16-year-old newly diagnosed leukemia patient‚ was presented with the
Premium Informed consent Clinical trial Clinical research
characters are constantly faced with situations that challenge their judgement and morality. While they all encounter similar ethical questions‚ the characters in The Oedipus Cycle all resolve their dilemmas in different ways. From the logic-minded nature of Antigoné to the overconfident nature of Oedipus‚ the way each and every character of The Oedipus Cycle deals with major moral dilemmas is an insight into not only their unique personalities‚ but also their status in society. The Oedipus Cycle‚ in short
Premium Oedipus Sophocles Oedipus at Colonus
“Ethical Dilemma at Northlake” Week 3 – Case Study # 1 Synopsis: The case begins with Jim McIntoch the vice president of finance of Amalgamated Forest Products having a conversation with Frank the manager of corporate reporting. Jim is upset with Frank and is confronting him about the decision he’s made about going public about a financial analysis report that Amalgamated Forest Products will present to the legislation. Frank is stating that the report is falsifying information about the how
Premium Vice President of the United States Ethics President
individual having a fake identical ID. When learning how to resolve ethical dilemmas‚ being able to communicate rationally for the reason of believing one decision seems right and another seems wrong is vital. My response to this scenario would be to
Premium
medical- ethical dilemma through my clinical assignment in pediatrics. My patient was a 3 month old female who was born dead. Apparently the mother suffered Placenta Abruptio‚ it is unknown how long the fetus suffered with hypoxia before birth. Nurses claim this infant was born dead. CPR was performed for more than 15 minutes before the heart started. Needless to say the baby was then placed on life support. A determination was made that the infant is brain dead. The major dilemma is that the
Premium Medicine Patient Health care
The Hiroshima atomic destruction remains a historical uncertainties and ethical dilemmas. The use of atomic bombs marked forever the relationship between the US and Japan‚ and the controversy over the use of atomic weapons will no doubt continue indefinitely. Historiography and comments on the issue are gigantic. Each generation of Americans and Japanese revisited the issue‚ and the following will no doubt continue. Indeed‚ the moral justification for the destruction of two Japanese cities is clear
Premium World War II Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Nuclear weapon
I’ve encountered an ethical dilemma situation in my recent capstone clinical. My clinical preceptor and I caught in the concepts of the principles of autonomy‚ veracity‚ and nonmalifecence. This occurred when we provided nursing service to a 30-years-old male patient who was taken to the ED as a post-code patient. The EMS team arrived in the scene and initiated CPR and defibrillated a client (on the floor of his room). The client ended up in the ICU with a diagnosis of hypoxic- anoxic injury (HAI)
Premium Ethics Physician Patient