Business Ethics 210 Prof. Bryan Mecklenburg Coltin Borthwick Case Study – An Ethical Dilemma Issue/Problem Identification Keys points of the case: Jackie‚ a young star with a prominent voice who gets picked up by a professional recording label after performing at a national talent competition. Overwhelmed with excitement‚ thinks it is a dream come true to start a career with a lucrative contract.
Premium Ethics
The Liebeck v. McDonald’s case was a product liability lawsuit filed by Stella Liebeck‚ a 79 year old woman who was burned by a scalding hot coffee. One Sunday afternoon in 1994‚ Stella Liebeck ordered a cup of coffee at a McDonald’s drive through in Albuquerque‚ New Mexico. As she sat alongside her grandson in a 1989 Ford Probe‚ Liebeck noticed that there were no cup holders on the passenger side. Acting quickly‚ Liebeck decided to put the coffee cup between her knees. When she removed the coffee
Premium Nutrition Obesity Blood
Implications of Telehealth This paper explores the scenario in which I am a Nurse Practitioner working in St. Theresa emergency dept. A patient is bought to the emergency room after he was found wandering through the streets. Upon assessment‚ he states that the government is plotting against him watching him through the TV. He claims that the government is also listening to his conversations through the cellphone. Furthermore when he goes to sleep the government people are coming to his
Premium Health care Medicine Health informatics
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES It is rather difficult to talk about ethics as it involves different point of view based on different moral standards one has and based on different ethical principles one uses. This Google China-cases mostly talks about the ethical dilemma faced by the company‚ whether it should obey the local law or put its global ethical standards as its best interest. Obeying the local law will push them to do self-censoring‚ which then raise many criticism internationally. Based on ‘cultural
Premium Ethics Morality People's Republic of China
In the case of the client in the posed vignette‚ the psychotherapist should advise the client to attend the session in-person because having the client attend the meeting could be a step towards overcoming his social anxiety‚ in addition‚ the psychotherapist stated that he is unsure of his competency in teletherapy. Using ethical theories as a moral framework provides insight into what an ethical solution to this dilemma might be (Fisher‚ 209‚ p. 40). In the case of the ethical theory that applies
Premium
CLAW1001: Commercial Transactions A Case Analysis Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44 Submitted by: Sindhuja Shankar SID: 305 127 950 3/10/2007 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Case Summary 3 Facts 3 Issues 3 Ratio 3 Decision 4 Critical Analysis 4 Commercial Implications 5 Legal Implications 6 Conclusion 6 Bibliography 7 Appendix † Research Plan 8 Introduction The case Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd[1] confirms the long held doctrine that employers are vicariously
Premium Law Agency Employment
Friendly Advice and Quid Pro Quo? Prior responding to the case study questions‚ I would like to mention two points that relates with employee’s unethical behaviour in an organization. The first is one is‚ the role of leaders in influencing unethical behaviour in the workplace. In most cases‚ employee did unethical act for the following reasons: due to lack of motivation‚ while falling in to ethical dilemma‚ and when they are under frustration…etc. When we discuss about unethical act‚ always it is
Premium Management Employment Leadership
I. Case Analysis A. The Situation As earlier mentioned‚ the case involves Mr. Romulo Bernas‚ a staff assistant in Prime Shipping Inc.‚ who earns a salary enough to support his family. He is directly reporting to a manager and has no fixed job description. He also works closely with Mr. Jose Narciso‚ a former New People’s Army member and is now a bodyguard of a politician connected to the Bureau of Customs (BOC). Mr. Bernas has been given several credits for his work. As such‚ he was
Premium Ethics
Running head: CRITICAL ETHICAL THINKING Critical Ethical Thinking Case Florida State College of Jacksonville Business Law I BUL3130 March 15‚ 2010 Abstract Many companies practice things that are unethical and illegal because it yields more profits to use such practices. Among these companies are the collection agencies because their main jobs are to use tactics to harass customers in an unlawful way using trickery to get what they want. In this case shows how managers prefer to use such
Premium Stock Business ethics Law
RENO v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION US Supreme Court‚ 1997 1. Claim: Attorney General Janet Reno‚ the appellant appealed directly to the Supreme Court as provided for by the Act’s special review provisions against the appellee‚ ACLU. 2. Facts: The 1996 Federal Communications Decency Act sought to protect minors from “indecent” and offensive Internet materials. The Act made it a crime to transmit obscene or indecent messages over the Internet. Immediately after the CDA became law‚ twenty
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States