CTS Placement Paper January‚ 2010 (Reasoning Ability) REASONING section (20 Q’s - 20 mins) Directions for Questions 1-4: In each questions below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. read the conclusion and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements‚ disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer: (A)
Premium Reasoning Conclusion
Reflective Thinking‚ Analytical Skills‚ Ethical Reasoning Free trade is a policy by which a government does not discriminate against imports or interfere with exports by applying tariffs (to imports) or subsidies (to exports). According to the law of comparative advantage the policy permits trading partners mutual gains from trade of goods and services. Under a free trade policy‚ prices emerge from supply and demand‚ and are the sole determinant of resource allocation. ’Free’ trade differs
Premium International trade
Today‚ ArcelorMittal‚ the world ’s leading steelmaker‚ and is more than three times the size of Nippon Steel‚ the second largest. Not only in terms of volume but also in terms of innovation‚ ArcelorMittal has managed to excel in comparison to its competitors. ArcelorMittal invests to develop other solutions to produce clean energy. During the latest BATIMAT‚ the world’s biggest building and construction fair‚ ArcelorMittal was awarded a Golden Innovation Medal for Arsolar‚ a solar panel designed
Premium Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility Business ethics
include good business ethics. Moral reasoning is integral part of business ethics. L. Kohlberg determined three levels of moral development that consists of six stages. The stages of Kohlberg ’s model relate to the qualitative moral reasoning adopted by individuals. According to this model‚ a person can not skip any stages and make headway sequentially. So‚ in this essay I will analyze Kohlberg ’s levels of moral reasoning‚ my own development concerning this model‚ how to reach the highest stage and
Premium Ethics Morality Kohlberg's stages of moral development
Ethical Decision-Making Models Ethical Decision Making Models Integrative Model The Integrative model was developed in 1998 by Tarvydas. This model includes 4 stages and uses elements from the principle ethics and virtue ethics model. Tarvydas designed this model in order to analyze the morals‚ beliefs and experiences of all individuals involved in the ethical dilemma. The model also allows for the review of any ethical principles involving
Premium Ethics Decision making
Evaluation of Ethical Decision-Making Models In today’s time‚ it is wise to have ethical principles in the counseling fields due to working with people who ethics are not of standards. There action may range from improper verbiage to the extreme of improper physical contact. In this review‚ we have two distinctive views to demonstrate models of effective decision-making. Corey’s and his team of authors have adapted two dimension of decision-making models based on ethical principles. The goals
Premium Ethics Philosophy Morality
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING BY INDIVIDUALS IN ORGANIZATIONS: AN ISSUE-CONTINGENT MODEL THOMAS M. JONES University of Washington The Academy of Management Review‚ Vol. 16‚ No. 2. (Apr.‚ 1991)‚ pp. 366-395. Abstract Existing theoretical models of individual ethical decision making in organizations place little or no emphasis on characteristics of the ethical issue itself. This article (a) proposes an issue-contingent model containing a new set of variables called moral intensity: (b) using
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics
Details ethical decision-making model chosen Ethical dilemmas for the older adult create complex problems that frequently involve challenges in determining who should be the decision makers concerning a person ’s health care. The following case study represents concerns that are common to the physically-declining elder adult with end-of-life involvement. Discussion of this scenario provides a decision making model in which the DECIDE framework has been chosen to cover concerns regarding the case
Premium Ethics Medicine Decision making
skillfully accepted decision-making model and apply the model that is most relevant to my particular situation. Failing to follow the model is an ethical problem in itself; for the reason being that I would creating a greater risk to the public if I were to rely on my own intuition alone about the situation. In my situation‚ I will be integrating Welfel’s ethical decision making model to come up with a final decision. First‚ I am going to recognize that there is an ethical dilemma.
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics
oneChapter 11.Bok’s model: is based on two premises that people must have empathy on those involved in ethical decision making and that maintaining social trust is a fundamental goal. The decision-making process involves first consulting one’s consciousness on what is right‚ then seeking expert advice for alternatives for the act that is creating the ethical dilemma‚ finally conducting public discussion with the parties involved. 2.Aristotle golden mean: this model focuses on
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy