"Ethical theories of aristotle and immanuel kant" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 6 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Immanuel Kant‚ guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that‚ an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view‚ utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands

    Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminology

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs Aristotle

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    century two philosophers‚ Plato and Aristotle‚ arose carving for themselves a trench in the philosophical world. We can see the biggest distinction between the two in their theories of how we know things exist. The traditions of Plato and Aristotle have been dubbed rationalism and empiricism respectively. Under these traditions many well known philosophers have formed their own theories of God‚ existence and the material world. Through these individual theories I will show how each fits into the category

    Premium Philosophy Epistemology Plato

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas Hobbes Vs. Immanuel Kant PART 1: Thomas Hobbes “Everyone is governed by his own reason‚ and there is nothing he can make use of that may not be a help unto him in preserving his life against his enemies (Hobbes‚ 120).” Thomas Hobbes‚ who is a considered a rational egoist‚ makes this point in his book Leviathan. Hobbes believes that the means of person’s actions can only be amounted to how it ultimately affects that person. Our moral duties that we perform in the end‚ all stem from self-interest

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Thomas Hobbes

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality he dubbed the "Categorical Imperative" (CI). Immorality thus involves a violation of the CI and is thereby irrational. This argument was based on his striking doctrine that a rational will must be regarded as autonomous‚ or free in the sense of being the author of the law that binds it. The fundamental principle of morality — the CI — is none other than this law of an autonomous will. Thus‚ at the heart of Kant’s moral

    Premium Morality Categorical imperative Ethics

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    University of Makati IV – GMK Prof. Richard Nellas Immanuel Kant German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is considered the most influential thinker of the Enlightenment era and one of the greatest Western philosophers of all times. His works‚ especially those on epistemology (theory of knowledge)‚ aesthetics and ethics had a profound influence on later philosophers‚ including contemporary ones. Kant’s philosophy

    Free Immanuel Kant Philosophy Empiricism

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Born Immanuel Kant in what is now known‚ as Kalingrad Russia in 1724‚ Kant became one of the greatest philosophers since the Greeks. Kant stayed in his hometown for most of his life and became famous for his brilliant mind and thoughts of his own ethical theory. Kant’s ethical theory is an analysis of the bases of the concepts of moral code and moral obligation. His theory goes into breaking down and giving guidelines to those rational beings who wish to live or seek to live a purely good life. They

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Morality

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wavey Krockett Ethics Midterm Paper Everyday Duties in the eyes of Immanuel Kant Abstract : . Kant’s ideas or his take on ethics was based upon autonomy (self-governance)‚ and reason. He believed that unless a person freely and willingly makes a choice‚ then their action has no meaning much less any moral value. Kant also thought that every man when using reason when analyzing moral dilemmas would in fact agree with what he called the Categorical Imperative

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 2388 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    German thought with philosophers such as Immanuel Kant‚ arguing that reason is a public matter that should be done for the betterment of society‚ but others such as Moses Mendelssohn believe the key to achieving an individual’s felicity is through their own private use of reason. Both agree reason is absolutely necessary in the pursuit of enlightenment‚ but each hold reason in their own unique regards as to how it should be used to achieve enlightenment. Immanuel Kant’s argument that public reason is

    Premium Philosophy Immanuel Kant Logic

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    second person that would agree with the idea of war having a different set of rules in the sense that war is more instinctive then that of a habit is Immanuel Kant. Kant holds the idea of the categorical imperative. Categorical is the Latin root to mean without exception and imperative means what must be done. This sums up the idea of one’s duty which Kant describes that duty is something one must do without exception. This idea of duty leans towards the idea of instinct because every person in the

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who‚ like several philosophers at the time‚ contemplated and wrote about morality‚ specifically the origin of human morals. Kant‚ unlike these other thinkers‚ believed that morality and religion‚ two topics that were typically paired together when speaking about morality‚ should be kept separate because they did not belong together. Kant believed that the only way to determine what was morally right and wrong could only be found by engaging reason‚ not religion

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Morality

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 50