Is it fair to deceive humans in an unethical psychological experiment in order to receive new information? This is a question that I believe needs to be asked when one thinks of the Milgram experiment‚ a psychological study set up in the U.S in 1965. American psychologist Stanley Milgram held an experiment in order to see how severely ordinary human beings could knowingly cause harm to another human. This idea came about when he studied the holocaust in Germany in WWII‚ and then in the Nuremberg
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
on Milgram & Zimbardo and explain which study is the most useful in understanding human behaviour in a social situation (focusing on the methods used and findings obtained) and which study is the most unethical. The study of social psychology‚ particularly conformity‚ is very difficult to conduct both ethically and accurately in order to be able to obtain useful results. In the studies done by Milgram and Zimbardo‚ ethics were definitely breached but to what extent were these experiments useful
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Stanley Milgram carried out one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. He was a psychologist at Yale University‚ conducting an experiment that focused on the conflict between obedience and morality. It showed that people have a strong tendency to obey with authority figures. Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an order even if it involved harming another individual. He was fascinated on how easily ordinary people could be influenced in committing
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
Brad Birnbaum October 30‚ 2012 The Milgram Experiment Sociology 115 The Milgram experiment‚ a study based on a person’s obedience to an authority‚ was a series of social psychology experiments. These experiments measured the willingness of people to obey a person with authority. During the study‚ head figures instructed participants to perform acts that would normally conflict with their personal morality. Milgram’s experiments started shortly after the trial of German Nazi
Premium Psychology Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiment One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram‚ a psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II‚ Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just
Free Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
The Milgram Experiment Milgram experiment was conducted at 1962 by Psychologist Stanley Milgram at Yale University. This experiment focused on how people will behave when their moral senses are conflicting with the authority. This experiment measured if people will obey authority or stand up what they believe for when their morals are challenged by a person with a greater social figure. These people who participated in the experiment were males in ages between twenty and forty. The volunteers were
Premium Education Psychology Teacher
Yale University‚ known as Stanley Milgram‚ provided one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology. He conducted an experimentation concentrating on the dispute amongst a response to a direct order from a superior and the internal logic of what is right or wrong in one’s behaviors or motives‚ compelling towards right action. The principal objective was to see how far a human would go when an authority ordered them to kill an innocent individual. Milgram wanted to be precise if the Germans
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
In May‚ 1962 an experiment was done at Yale University. The experiment was called Milgram’s Obedience to Authority. The participants of the experiment was forty males. The male’s ages were between twenty and fifty years old. Along‚ with the age differences they all had different occupations. Once the experiment begins the learner is tied down to a chair. The teacher is then put in a room opposite of the learner and is not able to see the learner. The purpose of the learner is to remember the line
Premium Education Teacher School
Milgram experiment tells us about human and obedience. Humans are socially adapted to the society they live in and obedience is when a group humans follows the rule no matter wrong or right. Humans are usually obedient in most situations. That is due to teachings they receive. For example‚ when Hitler was killing groups of people‚ it was wrong; but the group of authority just listen to him and followed the rules. This situation was wrong and harmful but it was something that they just followed because
Premium Morality Human Crime
Stanley Milgram Experiment The video I watched was a reenactment of the original Stanley Milgram experiment conducted by Derren Brown. In the experiment‚ the subjects were told that they were doing an experiment on how punishment could affect learning. They were tricked into thinking that they picked their own roles when they actually got the teacher roles and the actor got the learner role on purpose. They started the experiment by showing them what they were going to do to the “learner”. They were
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment