The abortion and the utilitarian view Abortion is a sensitive topic that requires a considerable amount of understanding when addressing the ethics behind it. Abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy thus ending the life of the embryo/fetus prematurely (Matthews MP‚ Dutt T‚ 1998). My ethical justification for abortion stems from a utilitarianism standpoint. When using the utilitarian consequential principle of ethics‚ we establish a set of general morals and rules in which we can apply
Free Pregnancy Abortion
Philosophers with utilitarian views would argue about whether abortion would be for the greater good for the family‚ individual and the society at large. With utilitarianism‚ there is no wrong doing in denying a woman an abortion‚ if it is for the good of society. John Stuart Mills‚ one of the strong advocates of the utilitarian theory‚ fought against age- long beliefs that abortion was demonic but rather the end results make
Premium Abortion Abortion debate John Stuart Mill
The Utilitarian model‚ in its broadest sense‚ can be described as “the greatest good for the greatest number” (38). This way of thinking prioritizes the needs of the many over the needs of the few. There are three approaches to this model‚ the cost-benefit approach‚ the act Utilitarian approach‚ and the rule Utilitarian approach. In the first approach‚ the course of action that is chosen is the course that produces the greatest benefit relative to cost. The act approach deals with problems that don’t
Premium Utilitarianism Utilitarianism Person
A utilitarian model of ethics is one where the greatest good is produced for the greatest number of people. As explained in the text‚ payola is the act of using money to get air play. They further add that statistics show a significant correlation between air play and generated profit from that song. In my opinion‚ this is an unethical from a utilitarian point of view. I argue this point of view because there is an emphasis on quality. This is one of the important milestones for any legitimate organization
Premium Ethics Intrinsic value Theory
Introduction The concept of abortion‚ regarding its morality and legality‚ has been one of the most controversial topics worldwide. In particular‚ this paper will use the Utilitarian perspective to explore the moral dilemma related to genetic/disability-selective abortion and to explain why I believe that this type of abortion is morally permissible. The Issue and the Ethical/Moral Dilemma By definition‚ a moral dilemma is a situation involving two or more competing moral principles‚ which each
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
(pvs) even though this would inevitably lead to the patient ’s death and even though‚ in the express opinion of a majority of their Lordships‚ the doctor ’s intent was to kill. The implications of the case are profound. A leading utilitarian bioethicist and advocate of euthanasia‚ Professor Peter Singer‚ has even commented that the case marks the collapse of the traditional Western ethic--the principle of the sanctity of human life. 1 There can be little doubt that the Law Lords dealt a blow to that principle
Premium Medicine Human Physician
Buddhists are not unanimous in their view of euthanasia‚ and the teachings of the Buddha don’t explicitly deal with it. Most Buddhists (like almost everyone else) are against involuntary euthanasia. Their position on voluntary euthanasia is less clear. States of mind The most common position is that voluntary euthanasia is wrong‚ because it demonstrates that one’s mind is in a bad state and that one has allowed physical suffering to cause mental suffering. Meditation and the proper use of pain
Premium Buddhism Suffering
Euthanasia and PAS Euthanasia and PAS In this paper‚ the main topic of discussion will be on how Utilitarian theory and Deontology handle the subject of euthanasia and PAS. While both methods have the same effect‚ PAS (Physician-Assisted Suicide) is performed by the patient injecting a prescribed lethal dose of medication‚ whereas euthanasia involves the doctor administering the lethal dose. The specific question being addressed in this paper is whether or not these options‚ PAS and euthanasia
Premium Death Euthanasia Suicide
and brutal forms of punishment that ruled the pre-modern structure of crime control and justice. Social contract theories disputed the political influence declared by the nobility and projected that all humans were liberated to act in whatever way they choose. Human beings act as free agents to make contracts with other humans to fulfill their civic and social duties. The utilitarian approach asserts that humans are principally driven by the idea to maximize their pleasure and diminish pain. The
Premium Political philosophy Utilitarianism Ethics
Nevertheless‚ there are significant differences between utilitarian and deontology. Utilitarians and deontology sometimes might arrive at variant answers to the question that whether it is ethical to implement a placebo-controlled trial for the purpose of testing whether the new drugs are efficient. Holding all other things constant‚ utilitarians might conclude that it is correct to conduct the placebo-controlled trial if the benefits outweigh the costs‚ while a deontologist would argue that it is
Premium Ethics Patient Health care