process of developing an evaluation tool with the participants was successful. Having the opportunity to frame their own questions allowed the youth to ask what they thought was important‚ using terminology that they fully understood. The participants’ evaluation was generally well received by the facilitators of the project‚ although on one occasion the validity of the data was questioned. Because the participants were easily identifiable through their individual evaluations‚ the forms could not be
Premium Psychology Learning Leadership
Critical Evaluation in Psychology: A Guide for Students Author: Julie Hulme Table of contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1 What will this handout help me with? 3 1.2 What is critical evaluation? 3 1.3 Asking questions 3 1.4 Who is writing? 3 1.5 What evidence is used to support the arguments made? 4 1.6 What does this work contribute to knowledge of the subject? 5 2. Summary 6 3. An exercise in critical evaluation 7 3.1 The extract 7 3.2 Questions 8 3.3 Possible answers to the questions
Premium Psychology Critical thinking Assessment
Critical Evaluation Essay on Scissor Cut from “Scarred for life II” (1999) Scarred for life is a series produced in two parts‚ Scarred for life I containing nine images and Scarred for life II containing ten images. The series represents moments of transition between childhood naiveté and mature states of self-awareness as a social subject. Each individual work betrays the persistence of childhood and adolescent trauma lodged within adult memory. Moffatt used photolithography (which was the most
Free Photography Image Critical thinking
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT – REACTION PAPER On the Case Study – Central Evaluation Unit July 21‚ 2012 submitted by: Caesar T. Michelena The XIII Directorate of the European Union has a Central Evaluation Unit (CEU) which is tasked with evaluation of applications for grants from academics under its “cooperation and foundations” scheme. This scheme distributed relatively small grants to fund cooperative research between universities in the EU. All applications were sent to the CEU’s processing
Premium European Union Computer program Time
Evaluation ‚Feedback and Rewards Objectives: To develop an understanding of: • Evaluation of Performance • Performance Evaluation feedback • Reinforcement theory • A model of Individual rewards • Rewards Affect Organizational concerns • Innovative reward system Organizations use rewards to attract‚ retain‚ and motivate people. But methods for distributing rewards vary from organization to organization‚ within the same organization across different levels and according to the nature
Free Motivation Reinforcement Reward system
Quantitative Study Evaluation Capella University Spring 2013: Instructor: Lisa McBride Quantitative Study Evaluation The purpose of this research is to evaluate the Effects of Classroom Structure on Student Achievement Goal Orientation. There were three classes chosen and the students had to set weekly goals based on performance and learning. Many of the students in the contingency group based their weekly goals more on learning than performance and many of the students
Premium Scientific method Educational psychology Psychology
Signature:…………………… Date:………… Background The case discuses about the evaluation of performance of James McGaran‚ Branch Manager of Citibank in Los Angeles by his Area Manager‚ Lisa Johnson‚ and the discrepancies that crept in during the evaluation process. In the case‚ it can be seen how Lisa Johnson had failed to reflect some of the performances properly leading to a stalemate position in the performance evaluation of an efficient manager like James McGaran. James McGaran was a branch manager
Premium Balanced scorecard Business terms Management
Establishing evaluation criteria is needed to evaluate alternatives and to make decisions. Depending on the nature of the problem different constraints may be used to design a policy. Once evaluating a clear criterion‚ we must go through a process of identifying alternatives that will later be evaluated in the terms of criteria. Evaluation criteria are grouped in four categories‚ identified by Bardach. For each policy problem‚ we should be able to identify relevant criteria in each category. They
Premium Cost-benefit analysis Costs Cost
Hi DD McWilliams‚ The chart below left reflects approximately 930 MAP evaluations that have not been completed for the 6/30/2015 closeout. The report was generated last week at ADOA so the numbers could have changed some. Attached are individual spreadsheets for each major element of Offender Operations. Spreadsheets list the employee and supervisor names and next steps that the supervisor should take to move the MAP forward. All steps should be taken until each MAP is completed and in
Premium Management Employment Project management
Statement of the ProblemThe California Division of Citibank has introduced a new performance scorecard to highlight the importance of a diverse set of measures in achieving the strategic goals of the division. Among the new measures introduced was a customer satisfaction indicator. Unfortunately‚ James McGaran‚ the manager of the most important branch and who consistently delivers impressive financial results scored "below par" on customer satisfaction. Frits Seeger‚ President of Citibank California
Premium Finance Customer Customer service