Our text indicated there are three major categories of evidence can be documentary evidence including electronic data (i.e. would be bank statements‚ any written confirmation from vendors/customers‚ emails‚ invoices‚ etc.) physical evidence (inventory count‚ fixed asset verification‚ etc.) Statements of witnesses/parties involved. Having statements or witness is a good thing as proof i.e. would be a car accident. Should you need to go to court for damage’s or medical whatever the case maybe‚ having
Premium Law Crime Police
usually easy…”1 Adrian Keane and Paul McKeown have noted down that evidence is merely information by which facts tend to be proved‚ and that the law of evidence is the body of law and discretion managing the means by which facts may be proved in court of law‚ tribunals‚ and even arbitrations where strict rules of evidence apply.2 Ian Dennis has also a very similar view regarding the definition for evidence‚ he is also stating that evidence is information‚ he goes on stating that the information provides
Premium Law Legal burden of proof Criminal law
Evidence of abuse is important so it needs to be preserved‚ this can be done in a variety of different ways. You can preserve evidence by only touching things you need to‚ securing all evidence somewhere it can not be tampered with by anyone‚ keeping logs of all conversations involving the abuse and keeping all relevant people up to date with details as often as possible‚ also taking photographs is a good way of preserving evidence. However the best way to preserve evidence is to inform the relevant
Premium Police Crime Abuse
Different types of evidence in Eye witness testimony: When deciding the guilt or innocence of individuals in court‚ juries‚ judges‚ and police investigators rely on three major types of evidence. Often‚ experts are relied on for information. For example‚ the mental state of the individual being accused. This “expert testimony‚” is not often relied on in Canadian court because some judges believe the information that is offered by experts‚ Psychologists in particular‚ is common sense. There are
Premium Testimony Law Jury
Trace Evidence Trace evidence is an important part of a team in solving crimes in forensic investigations. According to Edmond Locard‚ there is specific that no matter wherever people interact with their environment or is physically involved in a crime often leaves something at or something away from the scene. Those in this category of evidence include many diverse types of macroscopic or microscopic materials that certain examples are easily visible to our “naked eye”. The subject is broad and
Premium Forensic science Spectroscopy Forensic evidence
Please explain the Frye Standard. 1. The Frye Standard is a standard used to determine the admissibility of an expert’s scientific testimony. A court in which applies the Frye Standard must determine whether or not the method which the evidence was obtained was generally accepted by experts in the field in which it belongs. When did this standard come into effect and why? 2. The Frye Standard came out of a 1923 legal decision (Frye V United States). It was a case discussing the
Premium Evidence law Daubert standard Jury
Running head: DNA Evidence and Job Description/Ethics Name Course Tutor Date How would the environment affect this fragile evidence? II. Collecting Fingerprints from a Weapon Describe how you would collect a fingerprint from a weapon that could possibly have touch DNA on it as well. UNIT 9: Job Description for Latent Print Examiner Write a job description for a Latent Print Examiner. Latent Print Examiner Salary scale: Between $ 70‚000 and $
Premium Fingerprint DNA profiling Identification
does Flextronics have that its clients do not? Why? How can Flextronics leverage? Flextronics is one of the worlds largest EMS companies‚ with 12 billion in revenues‚ had an on usually good vantage point of the inventory surplus. The Singapore – based company makes everything from printed circuit boards to cell phones for a variety of high-tech clients‚ including Cisco‚ Lucent‚ Nortel‚ and Ericsson.” The telecom guys thought‚ ‘We can do no wrong‚” says Dan Pleshko‚ vice president of global procurement
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain Logistics
Administrative Law‚ Trimester 2‚ 2012 Assignment Question „[The] statutory “no evidence” ground of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby‚ Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222‚ at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam‚ which do you prefer‚ and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question‚ you should read the
Premium Law Common law
HISTORY OF CORRECTIONS History of Corrections: From Then to Now Kris L. Sullivan Colorado Technical University Online A Paper Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements of Corrections Solutions January 14‚ 2008 Abstract The U.S. corrections system‚ a subdivision of the criminal justice system‚ continues to undergo change. From its beginnings as laws written in stone‚ the corrections system has sought to punish offenders. The origin of the corrections system
Premium Management Sociology Anxiety