subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjde20 Why do we care about evidence synthesis? An introduction to the special issue on systematic reviews a Howard White & Hugh Waddington a a International Initiative for Impact Evaluation‚ 3ie‚ London‚ UK Version of record first published: 18 Sep 2012. To cite this article: Howard White & Hugh Waddington (2012): Why do we care about evidence synthesis? An introduction to the special issue on systematic reviews‚ Journal of
Premium Evidence-based medicine
com/viewarticle/534768. Originally published in APC Medicine Online. Pearson‚ A.‚ Wiechula‚ R.‚ Court‚ A. and Lockwood‚ C. 2005. The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare‚ The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2006. Systematic reviews - the review process‚ Levels of evidence. Vanderkroft‚ D.‚ Collins‚ C.‚ Fitzgerald‚ M.‚ Lewis‚ S. and Capra‚ S. 2007. Minimizing under nutrition in the older patient. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare
Premium Nutrition Obesity Evidence-based medicine
experience‚ confiding entirely on this‚ can result in faulty decisions as it can be influenced by biases and heuristics (Crist‚ McVay & Marocco‚ 2015). Employing the best‚ current evidence available to compliment our clinical skills and patient values can promote good patient outcome. To facilitate successful evidence collection‚ appraisal‚ and integration‚ the first step is to recognize the need for information and develop a focused and searchable clinical question (Crist‚ McVay & Marocco‚ 2015)
Premium Randomized controlled trial Evidence-based medicine Middle age
controlled by the National Health Service (NHS) (SPH‚ 2006). The tool is based on the guidelines formed by a group of clinicians at McMaster University‚ Canada (SPH‚ 2010). Additionally‚ the author will apply the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2009 checklist as a guide to support this discussion. The PRISMA checklist is a 27 item checklist‚ subject to modification as new evidence emerges (Liberati et al‚ 2009). Accordingly‚ this critical appraisal will
Premium Evidence-based medicine
in evidence-based practice. Journal of nursing management. 15(1)‚ 107-113. Herson‚ M & Sturmey‚ P. (2012). Handbook of Evidence-Based Practice in Clinical Psychology‚ Adult Disorders. Retrieved from http://primo.unilinc.edu.au/primo_library/libweb/action/dlDisplay.do?vid=ACU&docld=aleph002258841 McKenna‚ H. (2004). Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care. US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. 45(2)‚ 178-89. Stevens‚ K. (2013). The impact of Evidence-Based Practice
Premium Nursing Health care Hygiene
most current‚ and valid evidence‚ without becoming too overwhelmed. PICOT is like a puzzle. By putting together all of the components that focus on a specific patient problem or population‚ intervention or issue‚ comparisons‚
Premium Evidence-based medicine Question
possible. (Hemingway & Brereton‚ 2009). Systematic reviews are conducted by nurse researchers to avoid reaching incorrect or misleading conclusions that could arise from a biased study. Systematic reviews are perceived by many as the cornerstone of evidence-based practice. (Polit‚ 2012). The issue of concern that this article addresses is “to systematically evaluate nurse working conditions and to review the literature dealing with their association with patient outcomes.” (Bae‚ 2011). “The aim of this
Premium Nursing Health care Evidence-based medicine
A Literature review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of mother/baby skin-to-skin care on successful breast-feeding Abstract Review: A critical literature review of the evidence about the effects of mothers and newborns early Skin-to-Skin contact on breast-feeding behavior. Background: The World Health Organization (WHO)‚ in 2003 recommended that babies should be fed exclusively on breast milk until six months of age. Several studies support that early (within
Premium Breastfeeding Infant Evidence-based medicine
determine whether the use of Biopatch on the exit site of central venous catheter (CVC) can help prevent infection. Before any research was undertaken‚ a focused question was formulated and a search strategy was then developed to compare the available evidence. A PICO (Sackett et al 1997) was undertaken using the terms Central Venous Catheter‚ Chlorhexidine‚ Biopatch and Infection. A Facet analysis (Ranganathan 1967‚ cited by Spiteri 1998) was performed and a literature search was conducted using four
Premium Randomized controlled trial Central venous catheter Clinical trial
1748-8583.2011.00173.x PROVOCATION SERIES PAPERS: HRM IN THE 21ST CENTURY Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner Denise M. Rousseau‚ Carnegie Mellon University Eric G. R. Barends‚ Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Human Resource Management Journal‚ Vol 21‚ no 3‚ 2011‚ pages 221–235 Evidence-based HR (EBHR) is a decision-making process combining critical thinking with use of the best available scientific evidence and business information. We describe how to get started as an evidencebased HR practitioner
Premium Evidence-based medicine Management Decision making