(CJC) limits the capability of judges to acquire external counsel from law experts (Gatowski‚ 2001). Gatowski (2001) also stipulates that Canon 3(A) (4) allows judges to get counsel from an impartial expert witness on the regulation applicable to a previous trail through mere amicus curiae‚ if they give parties levelheaded chance to counter (Atlas and Atlas‚
Premium Critical thinking Evidence law Expert
Court observation The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rises. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. The court is also the place where a just‚ fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance
Premium Jury Evidence law
Computer Crime and e-Evidence What is the link between the development of technology and criminal offences? Trends are developing to shift the nature of crimes from traditional to Hi-Tech and it is impossible to prevent people from misusing technology to commit crimes. Computer or networks may be used as a tool or a storage medium to commit crimes. In the meantime‚ we must keep in mind that all computers related systems are vulnerable to destruction and intrusion. As a result some authors classify
Premium Computer Computer program Data
1. What is Computer Forensics? System forensics is the process of systematically examining computer media as well as network components‚ software‚ and memory for evidence. System forensics involves collecting‚ preserving‚ analyzing‚ and documenting evidence to reconstruct user activities. Appropriately collected evidence is often presented in court to solve criminal cases and prosecute criminals. 2. How has technology improved the way criminal investigators perform their job? Technology improved
Premium Evidence law Forensic science
08th October 2008 Tort-Obligations II Tutorial 1 1. What is Tort law for? ▪The law of tort- The word derives from the French for ‘Wrong’. ▪ The civil action for damages aims at compensation as opposed to criminal prosecution. Restoring the status quo. ▪Appeasement- the object of early law is to prevent disruption of society by disputes arising from the infliction of injury. The victim’s vengeance is bought off by compensation‚ which gives him satisfaction in 2 ways; he is comforted to receive
Premium Tort Negligence Law
eyewitness evidence. Eyewitness evidence is hugely influential in the conviction of those accused of crimes‚ however multiple factors can manipulate the recall of events witnessed and as such mistakes frequently occur. The techniques for gathering witness evidence have historically lacked a consistent procedural standard (Fisher‚ 1995)‚ with huge variation in line-up procedure and witness interview techniques. Cognitive psychologists have influenced several avenues of gathering eyewitness evidence. Two
Premium Psychology Eyewitness identification Crime
Admin Law Outline Overall Analysis 1. Enabling Statute—What was Congress thinking? 2. Constitutional Questions 3. Is informal rulemaking (quasi-legislative) or formal rulemaking (quasi-adjudicative) appropriate? 4. Is there sufficient notice? The red highlighted material will not be covered on the exam although it is important information for understanding Admin. law. 3 ½ hrs. to complete exam. I. The Origin and Mandate of Administrative Agencies Purpose 1. Regulate personal behavior of
Premium Separation of powers Government agency Law
Steps Necessary in Making Electronic Evidence Admissible in Court Name: Course: Instructor: Institution: Date of Submission: Introduction Electronic evidence or digital evidence is any information stored digitally that a party in a court case may use to prove a case in a court trial. This kind of evidence has been in use in the courtrooms for some timeandmay come in the form of instant message history logs‚ ATM transactions‚ browser history‚ databases‚ and other forms of electronic materials. The
Premium Jury Evidence law
Year 11 Language Analysis Sample Essay Laws Will Not Change P-Platers There is always danger when driving‚ especially when inexperienced probationary drivers are using the same roads. How to limit their impact on the safety of others is a major issue. Lauren Martella‚ in her opinion article‚ Laws Will Not Change P-Platers‚ published in the Herald Sun on the 17th of January 2008‚ notes in a calm‚ informal and rational tone‚ that no laws restricting the freedom of P-Plate drivers will help. Martella
Premium Law Reason Appeal
seizure. People are concerned with the issue of illegally seized evidence or any evidence that is confiscated without following due process of the Bill of Rights. The illegally seized evidence is generally gathered when a police officer conducts a search without the proper paperwork‚ such as a proper warrant or inadequate interrogations. The exclusionary rule‚ which is the legal obligation of law enforcement‚ states that any evidence or statements must be
Premium Police Crime Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution