Action Plan: Dr Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc. Energy Beverages Action Plan: Dr Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc. Energy Beverages Inhoud Introduction. 3 Analysis. 3 The Market. 3 Competitors. 4 Customer behaviour. 4 Marketing Mix 4ps. 5 Product. 5 Place. 5 Price. 5 Promotion. 5 Recommendation. 6 Target Market. 6 Product Line and Positioning. 6 Marketing. 6 Advertisements and Promotion. 6 Pricing. 7 Introduction The history of Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. is very complex
Premium Energy drink Marketing Soft drink
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc. 1. How would you characterize the energy beverage category‚ competitors‚ consumers‚ channels‚ and DPSG’s category participation in late 2007? § Five dominant competitors: Red Bull‚ Hansen Natural (Monster)‚ Pepsi (Sobe Adrenaline Rush‚ AMP)‚ Rockstar‚ and Coke (Tab‚ Full Throttle) § $6.2 billion industry in 2006 § Grew at a rate of 42.5% from 2001 to 2006‚ 10.2% from 2007-2011 Consumers limit their choices to only 1.4 different brands indicating brand loyalty
Premium Marketing Advertising Energy drink
Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc. Grade ID: 12258 Date: 2/14/2011 The problem associated with this case is whether or not the company should introduce a new energy beverage brand into the market. If a profitable market opportunity exists for the company to enter the energy beverage market the next step would be to identify a target market and marketing mix along with a product line and brand positioning. The best opportunity for the company to gain market share is to target adult
Premium Marketing Retailing Drink
More ▼ Search this site Dr. Pepper/Snapple SWOT Analysis SWOT Analysis Index Dr. Pepper/Snapple SWOT Analysis Add a New SWOT Analysis | Update This Page Now ►Summary | Profile | News | Chart | SWOT | Cash Flow | Comps | Buffett | WACC Strengths Technology (Dr. Pepper/Snapple) Superior tec… 0 Supply Chain (Dr. Pepper/Snapple) A strong … Unique Products (Dr. Pepper/Snapple) Uniqu… Strong Management (Dr. Pepper/Snapple) S… Brand Name (Dr. Pepper/Snapple) A strong b… Add Weaknesses
Premium Mutual fund Investment Strategic management
As social responsibility and environmentally friendly attitudes have become more prevalent‚ many companies have moved towards adapting technologies that are more efficient and less damaging to the environment. The Dr. Pepper Snapple Group takes this corporate social responsibility extremely seriously. They believe that environmental stewardship is core to operating a company that will be successful in the long term. As such they have challenged themselves to move towards more environmentally friendly
Premium
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc. (DPS) is an integrated beverage brand owner‚ manufacturer‚ and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages in the U.S.‚ Canada‚ and Mexico and the Caribbean. Their headquarters is in Plano‚ Texas‚ and Dr Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc. is a leading provider of flavored carbonated soft drinks and non-carbonated beverages. They have built their success through strategically acquiring beverage brands and then building them into leaders in their category. Examples of their notable
Premium Marketing Dr. Dre United States
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Case Study Financial Management Derks‚ V (3997979). Doyle‚ D (4137531) & Ichev‚ R (4111443). Commissioned by the University of Utrecht. Introduction Originating to as early as 1880‚ Dr Pepper has become one of the most famous producers of carbonated drinks around the world. On May 7‚ 2008 the brand was spun-off from its parent company‚ Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages‚ or CSAB. The company was split into two with Dr. Pepper Snapple Group controlling
Premium Marketing Dr. Dre United States
Dr Pepper Snapple External Analysis * Bargaining Power of suppliers – Medium The switching cost to find other suppliers of commodities to produce beverage is not high‚ and those suppliers are not concentrated or differentiated. However‚ the recession significantly increased commodity prices‚ and DPS has very little power in affecting the prices they pay for these commodities. * Bargaining Power of buyers - Medium Individual buyers do not put high pressure on DPS‚ but large buyers like
Premium Coffee Drink Pepsi
Case Analysis Dr. Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc.: Energy Beverages 1. How would you characterize the energy beverage category‚ competitors‚ consumers‚ channels‚ and DPSG’s category participation in late 2007? The energy beverage category was the fourth largest nonalcoholic beverage category in America during 2006. While it wasn’t among the top three‚ it was the fastest growing beverage category. The energy beverage market is primarily led by three big name brands including Red Bull‚ Monster Energy
Premium Marketing Energy drink Dr. Dre
Assignment 3.4 – Case Study: Dr. Pepper Snapple Group‚ Inc.: Energy Beverages 1. How would you characterize the energy beverage category and competitors in late 2007? A slow growing market is a great way to characterize the energy beverage category in late 2007. This industry was increasing in profits still but was not increasing in profits as quickly due to factors such as market maturity‚ increasing in prices‚ competition and new hybrid products (Kerin & Peterson‚ 2010). The market was still
Premium Energy drink Marketing Sports drink