Abstract This research paper discusses the opposition side of my chosen topic “Should the animals be used for scientific research”. It will evidently elucidate why it is malicious for the animals to be used as scientific research. Animals cannot be compared to humans when it comes to finding out what product or drug is competent for human to use‚ because animals and humans have different hormones. It is also been proven with the drug thalidomide‚ that even though it has been tested on thousands of
Premium Animal rights Animal testing Animal Liberation Front
Animal experimentation is a big part of medical progress. Opponents of animal testing point out the amount of animals used and the different types of animals used but if you look at it‚ it’s all for a good reason. Animal experimenters don’t do this just to do it. It’s for a purpose. There are thousands upon thousands of medical situations that couldn’t have been done without animal experimenting. Animal suffering is pointed out but for the most part animals go without feeling any pain. Animal experimentation
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Medical research
Science Versus Ethics and the Need for more Receptiveness in Animal Experimentations Animal activists are calling for a ban on animal testing despite the fact that with the development of new treatments‚ which are tested on animal in treating HIV‚ cancers‚ and other epidemics‚ people who live the day hopelessly in the threat of death from such diseases now can see the hope of being cured. In opposition‚ many scientists and medical institutions claim that animal right activists are overreacting
Premium Animal testing Animal rights People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Regulations and Legislations at Huntingdon Life Sciences Following accidents and allegations‚ it has been said that health and safety are not being taken serious in Britain’s Scientific Workplaces‚ there are many organisations that keep a check on laboratories to make sure that they are continuing to maintain the standards that are required for that particular scientific area and that all the staff members who work there are not being put at risk. The aims of these regulations are to ensure safe
Premium Animal testing Risk Animal rights
Heather Rise SPC 205-W06 June 8‚ 2013 Animal Research General Purpose: To inform Specific Purpose: As a result of my speech‚ my audience will be able to explain the diversity in animal research. Central Idea: Even after looking at all the facts involved in animal research‚ it is still hard to know right from wrong. Introduction I. Have you ever wondered how the procedures for heart surgery were developed? II. Animal research‚ using dogs‚ led to this life-saving
Premium Human anatomy Animal testing Animal rights
Animals for testing or not In the two articles‚ Heloisa Sabin and Peggy Carlson have different points about the animal testing. Both articles argued on the issue and there does not seem to be any agreement between the two writes‚ while there is an evident disagreement between them. Sabin agrees to Animal Testing. Animal research saves human lives but Carlson disagrees. Animal tests are unreliable. In “Animal Research Saves Human Lives” Heloisa Sabin (The Wall Street Journal‚ October 18‚ 1995)
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Animal Liberation Front
Rammy Mekhilef Mr. Drake H Lang and Comp April 20th‚ 2009 Animal Testing for Research ’ Pro side The death of one dog vs. saving the life of many diabetic humans. Which would you pick? Diabetes caused many deaths before insulin was discovered from the pancreas of a dog. After insulin was discovered‚ it could be injected into the bloodstream to keep the insulin level high. Along with this‚ much of our medicinal discoveries are experimented on different types of animals. Many people support the
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Pain
THE BODY SHOP The Body Shop was founded in 1976 in Brighton (UK) by Anita Roddick.it now has now more than It changed the image of “Glamour and Beauty”. It brought about use of natural “exotic” products to cleanse and polish the skin & hair. Started new movements by refusing animal testing and being environmentally friendly “The business of business should not just be about money it should be about responsibility. It should be about public good‚ not private greed.” Anita Roddick. Core Values
Premium Animal testing Animal rights British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
Regulatory agencies across the globe make it mandatory for companies to get their ’products’ tested for toxicity before making them available in the market. These ’products’‚ which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics‚ are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation‚ skin penetration‚ eye irritation‚ carcinogenicity‚ etc. On the basis of these tests‚ it is determined whether the said product is fit for human use or not. Even though it is not mandatory to get premarket approval
Premium Animal rights People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Animal testing
This study has been approved by Adnan Menderes University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee for the ethical care and use of animals in research. All animal care and experimental procedures were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 1985. Animals In this prospective‚ randomized study‚ 6-month old Wistar Albino female rats (210-250 g weight) and their 27 pups provided by Adnan Menderes University Medical Faculty Experimental Animal
Premium Animal testing Animal rights People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals