Experimental Errors and Uncertainty Data: The data table that follows shows data taken in a free-fall experiment. Measurements were made of the distance of fall (Y) at each of the four precisely measured times. Time‚ t (s) Dist‚ y1 (m) Dist‚ y2 (m) Dist‚ y3 (m) Dist‚ y4 (m) Dist‚ y5 (m) <y> σ t2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.5 0.75 2.6 3.2 2.8 2.5 3.1 1.0 4.8 4.4 5.1 4.7 4.8 1.25 8.2 7.9 7.5 8.1 7.4 Procedures From the above data perform the following Tasks. Task 1. Complete
Premium Measurement General relativity Analytic geometry
subject to error which leads to the uncertainty of the result. Errors may come from systematic errors (deterministic error) or random error (not deterministic error). In this experiment‚ the group measured the diameter of sphere using different kinds of measuring devices (foot rule‚ vernier caliper‚ and micrometer caliper) in order to achieve accuracy in the scientific measurements. After experimenting‚ it was revealed that the micrometer caliper has the lowest percentage of error. 1. Introduction
Premium Measurement
were to determine error in measurements and the derived quantities‚ volume and density. The diameter was determined using a dial caliper and the mass‚ a triple beam balance. The results of the error for diameter were not as expected while the results of the volume and density were deviated greatly from expectations; only the weight had a small error. Experimental Instruments: 1. Steel ball 2. Dial caliper (Mano Stat Corp.) 3. Triple beam balance (OHAUS) Procedure: 1. The steel ball
Premium Standard deviation Measurement Fundamental physics concepts
Experimental Errors and Uncertainty Data: The data table that follows shows data taken in a free-fall experiment. Measurements were made of the distance of fall (Y) at each of the four precisely measured times. Time‚ t (s) Dist‚ y1 (m) Dist‚ y2 (m) Dist‚ y3 (m) Dist‚ y4 (m) Dist‚ y5 (m) <y> σ t2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.5 0.75 2.6 3.2 2.8 2.5 3.1 1.0 4.8 4.4 5.1 4.7 4.8 1.25 8.2 7.9 7.5 8.1 7.4 Procedures From the above data perform the following Tasks. Task 1. Complete
Premium Measurement Error Analytic geometry
Experiment 4: Experimental Errors and Uncertainty Brett R. Spencer Date Performed: June 10th‚ 2015: 3:10 p.m. PHY 111C02 Section 1: Experiment and Observation Time‚ t (s) Dist. Y1 (m) Dist. Y2 (m) Dist. Y3 (m) Dist. Y4 (m) Dist. Y5 (m) Mean of Y Standard Dev. t^2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.50 1.28 0.22 0.25 0.75 2.60 3.20 2.80 2.50 3.10 2.84 0.30 0.56 1.00 4.80 4.40 5.10 4.70 4.80 4.76 0.16 1.00 1.25 8.20 7.90 7.50 8.10 7.40 7.82
Premium Statistics Standard deviation Arithmetic mean
Experiment 1: Errors‚ Uncertainties and Measurements Laboratory Report Department of Math and Physics College of Science‚ University of Santo Tomas Abstract With the use of the ruler‚ vernier caliper‚ micrometer caliper and electronic gram scale‚ the group was able to acquire different sets of measurements by measuring the sphere of unknown composition. The group then was able to compute its mean diameter‚ average deviation‚ average deviation of the mean‚ volume‚ mass and % percent
Free Measurement Volume
Section: ___________________ Experimental Errors and Uncertainty Data: The data table that follows shows data taken in a free-fall experiment. Measurements were made of the distance of fall (Y) at each of the four precisely measured times. Time‚ t (s)|Dist‚ y1 (m)|Dist‚ y2 (m)|Dist‚ y3 (m)|Dist‚ y4 (m)|Dist‚ y5 (m)||σ|t2| 0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0| 0.5|1.0|1.4|1.1|1.4|1.5|1.3|.2|.25| 0.75|2.6|3.2|2.8|2.5|3.1|2.8|.3|.56| 1.0|4.8|4.4|5.1|4.7|4.8|4.8|.3|1| 1.25|8.2|7.9|7.5|8.1|7.4|7.8|
Premium Measurement Acceleration Error
Measurements Experiment Leader: John Paolo Andes Members: Bea Mendoza Tricia dela Cruz Jeesza Albis Era Diana Augusto Robin Peralta Franz Mondoñedo Jan Mykiel Agar Reginald Turingan Michael Villaverde Zoren Eleazar Caspe Angelo Duque Paolo Serrano Dan James Losorata Aldrin Jay Bondoc Zeus Marquez Liezel Pantoja Date Performed: July 11‚ 2013 Date Submitted: I. Objective To understand the relationship between the construction of a measuring instrument and
Premium
Experiment 1: Errors‚ Uncertainties‚ and Measurements Laboratory Report Margarita Andrea S. de Guzman‚ Celine Mae H. Duran‚ Celina Angeline P. Garcia‚ Anna Patricia V. Gerong Department of Math and Physics College of Science‚ University of Santo Tomas España‚ Manila Abstract Measurements‚ defined as a comparison with a standard‚ are essential in the study of physics. However‚ all measurements are prone to errors. There are two sources of errors: systematic errors random errors.
Premium Measurement
Experiment 1: Errors‚ Uncertainties and Measurements Laboratory Report Abstract The success of an experiment greatly depends on how the group is able to execute it and how precise and accurate their results are. In this matter‚ errors and uncertainties in measurements are of great factor. In this experiment‚ the group was able to classify the causes of such errors and which measuring device is more precise and accurate than the other. These were obtained by measuring the diameter of an iron sphere
Premium Measurement