Experiment 1: Error‚ Uncertainties and Measurements Laboratory Report Jan Luke Mendoza‚ Alexis Vienne Munar‚ Paula Murakami‚ Giorla Joanne Negre Department of Math and Physics College of Science‚ University of Santo Tomas Espana‚ Manila Abstract Throughout the experiment the main goal is to find out about the realities in taking measurements‚ that is‚ that there will always be an uncertainty for each acquired value. And to find out and recognize these uncertainties was handled in the
Premium Measurement
Milgram Obedience and Authority experiment‚ The Stanford Prison experiment‚ and of course the Abu Ghraib scandal involving our own U.S. soldiers. While two of these instances were not intended to cause physical harm‚ they were all branded unethical due to the extent of not only the physical abuses that took place‚ but the painful psychological impact it left on those involved. One experiment‚ called The Milgram experiment‚ also raised ethical concern. The experiment consisted of 40 men recruited using
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
bob February 5‚ 2013 Research Methods Stanford Prison Experiment 1. Prisoners were put under a great deal of stress. The prisoners were physiologically and physically harmed. Prisoners were stripped naked‚ chained‚ and was forced to wear bags over their heads. 2. Yes there was voluntary participation in the experiment‚ because all of the participants signed up for the experiment. But the acts committed in the experiment most likely weren’t voluntary‚ meaning that the prisoners did
Premium Stanford prison experiment Ethics
1. Animals Experiments were carried out in adult male Wistar rats (200-225 g; 2-2.5 months old)‚ obtained from Central Animal Research Facility‚ NIMHANS‚ Bengaluru. Adult rats were group-housed (3 per cage) in a climate-controlled vivarium with a 12:12 h dark/light cycle. All animals had free access to food and drinking water except during the stress procedure or behavioral evaluation. All the experiments were performed during the light phase between 10:00 h and-14:00 h. All experiments were approved
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Behaviorism
Choice: C Caitlin Bordzuk Michael H. Feldler Psych 105 14 October 2014 Blue Eyes vs. Brown Eyes Through the eyes of a kindergarten class‚ prejudice dynamics were shown in a simple yet powerful experiment. On April 5 1968 Jane Elliot preformed the famous experiment in her classroom separating blue-eyed and brown-eyed students. She had separated them by making one eye group inferior to the other making them have certain benefits and better treatment than the other. Then it was
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Racism African American
Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners. The experiment had a unit of people willing to help the study (“On
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
sensor‚ ECG sensor‚ breathing rate sensor‚ thermometer‚ TI-84 calculator. The experiment began using a TI-84 calculator as a random number generator‚ and 1-4 inputted into the calculator to determine order. Numbers 1-3 were inputted to determine the order of experimental groups for the participant. A plastic tub was then filled with a liter of water at 25℃‚ and a thermometer was placed into the water to verify. The experiment was divided into three sections; 30 seconds before submission‚ during submission
Premium Water Chemistry Temperature
such as natural gas‚ propane‚ and oil furnaces. Thermistors are temperature sensing elements composed of sintered semiconductor materials such as silicon carbide that exhibit large changes in resistance in response to small changes in temperature. [3] Unlike most resistors‚ thermistors decrease in resistance as temperature increases because of their negative temperature coefficients as derived from their material properties. This relationship between resistance and temperature is better described
Premium Temperature Resistor Celsius
emotionally and physically involved. Secondly he denied Richard Yacco the ability to leave. Whenever one conducts an experiment‚ all who are involved should have the right to end their involvement at anytime. Finally there was no proper debriefing‚ as well as it was argued that many left in a worse mental state then prior to the experiment. Now some may not be bothered by such an experiment in fact‚ we have seen other controversial studies such as Mailgrams’ study‚ where he was studying the conflict between
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Purpose The reason for this experiment is to prove that objects of different masses‚ when dropped from the same height‚ fall at the same velocity. Apparatus - 2 Marbles of different mass‚ one steel and one nylon - Dropping Mechanism with a lever to hold the marble and pull for drop - Bee Spi (measures velocity in kilometers per hour.) - Box to catch the marble on the way down Procedure The dropping mechanism was set up‚ with the BeeSpi attached to it at 26.5” from the lever that drops
Premium Force Mass Classical mechanics