Stanley Milgram: ’electric shock’ experiments (1963) - also showed the power of the situation in influencing behaviour. 65% of people could be easily induced into giving a stranger an electric shock of 450V (enough to kill someone). 100% of people could be influenced into giving a 275V shock. The Milgram Experiment Stanley Milgram (1963) Experiment: Focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Investigate: Whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
I don’t think this experiment should be replicated today. The reason being is that the Generation we have today has a different mindset and that the experiment is unethical in my view. In 1961‚ Milgram was able to make the participants agree with the experiment. These results led to people trying out these trails because the participants knew the shock would be painful but not dangerous. With that being said‚ it shows you the mindset of the people during that time. People were laid back and were
Premium Psychology Stanford prison experiment Ethics
Several priming experiment were discussed‚ and the results were astonishing. One of the experiment was‚ students were asked to walk down a corridor to their professor’s office and take the “scrambled sentence test.” Throughout the test‚ words like “worried”‚ “Florida‚” “old‚” “lonely‚” “gray‚” “bingo‚” and
Premium Mind Consciousness
Abstract An experiment is conducted to prepare soap and thus‚ to compare the properties of the prepared soap and synthetic detergents which are precipitation‚ emulsification and cleaning abilities. It can be concluded that soap has the properties if emulsifying oil whereas detergent has not. The abilities of forming precipitates can be seen clearly in soap solution whereas detergent forms no precipitates at all. The experiment is completed and successfully conducted. Introduction
Premium Water Soap Sodium hydroxide
Part I - Illumination Experiments (1924-27) These experiments were performed to find out the effect of different levels of illumination (lighting) on productivity of labour. The brightness of the light was increased and decreased to find out the effect on the productivity of the test group. Surprisingly‚ the productivity increased even when the level of illumination was decreased. It was concluded that factors other than light were also important. Part II - Relay Assembly Test Room Study (1927-1929)
Premium Motivation Bank
Title Antimicrobial properties in different type of plants. Introduction A substance that kills or prevents the growth of microorganisms for example bacteria‚ fungi or protozoans is called an antimicrobial. This substance has 2 major roles which are to either kill microbes (microbiocidal) or prevent the growth of microbes (microbiostatic). Disinfectants are antimicrobial substances used on non-living objects outside the body. This substance included antibiotics‚ antifungals‚ antiprotozoals and
Premium Bacteria Agar Antimicrobial
Design of a Psychological Experiment Psyc 100 (0110-0129) Fall‚ 1996 Dr. Sternheim Report #1 (10 points) Problem: Suppose you are a psychologist who is interested in the effects of caffeine on the eye-hand coordination of students enrolled at UMCP. Design an experiment to test the hypothesis that caffeine enhances a student’s ability to hit a baseball. Describe your experiment by answering the following questions: 1) What are the independent and dependent variables? The independent variable
Premium Psychology Scientific method Statistics
The Holy experiment William Penn holy experiment is to create a colony on the principle of self-government‚ religious toleration‚ and brotherly love. William Penn make a government which can run with the law of the people. Pennsylvania first constitution organized the government into three parts: the governor‚ the seventy two member of provisional council‚ and general assembly with two hundred member. While the proprietor held his office by hereditary‚ the council and assembly were elected by the
Premium Religion Freedom of religion Pennsylvania
The hypothesis was rejected in this experiment‚ based on the results. The results were much different than hypothesized before the experiment. It was hypothesized that the lower concentrations of CLR‚ Jar E and Jar D‚ would be healthier and more likely to reproduce than the higher concentrations of CLR‚ Jar B and C. However‚ as shown in the actual results‚ Jar E and D with the lower concentrations of CLR died quicker than Jar B and C. The CLR and water solutions acted as a fertilizer‚ so the greater
Premium
Unfortunately‚ we did not have any data for week four due to the Astros parade‚ and during the fifth week of data collecting‚ two nightcrawlers went missing during the experiment in one of the containers‚ so the results for the Gain at 0.06% were inaccurate and the six week mass count as shown in figure one‚
Premium Water Water pollution Environmentalism