of the prosecution’s evidence. Through methods of discovery of evidence‚ both the prosecution and defense have equal opportunity to develop evidence they believe is needed to prove or dismiss/ reject claims. Trace evidence and the preservation of evidence are very vital in any investigation. These two components are two of the most important things that can help investigators find their suspect(s)‚ and lock them up or if done without proper care‚ the preservation of evidence or lack thereof can possibly
Premium Criminal law Police
statements against interest are not excluded by hearsay. When a prosecutor seeks to introduce evidence of a statement that inculpates the accused‚ a number of courts require that statement be against the declarants interest and that there be corroboration. Factors that courts look at for corroboration include motive‚ general character of the declarant‚ whether more than one person heard the statement‚ whether it was made spontaneously and the timing of the declaration and relationship between the declarant
Premium Evidence law
Evidence of abuse is important so it needs to be preserved‚ this can be done in a variety of different ways. You can preserve evidence by only touching things you need to‚ securing all evidence somewhere it can not be tampered with by anyone‚ keeping logs of all conversations involving the abuse and keeping all relevant people up to date with details as often as possible‚ also taking photographs is a good way of preserving evidence. However the best way to preserve evidence is to inform the relevant
Premium Police Crime Abuse
Running head: Evidence 1 Evaluating Reliable Evidence Amanda R.Wilborn CM223 Professor C April 19‚ 2011 Introduction Evidence is any information gathered at the scene of a crime that may be relevant to a criminal investigation. There are different types of evidence that varies from Paperwork‚ Photographs‚ DNA‚ Finger prints; etc... These different kinds of evidence also require different types
Premium Forensic evidence Evidence law Crime
Evidence – Means‚ Mode‚ or Manner to Ascertain the Truth about a Matter of Fact in a Judicial Proceeding. Essential Parts of the Legal Definition of Evidence: WHAT: 3M – Means‚ Mode or Manner WHY: ATF – to ascertain the truth about a matter of fact WHERE: J – in a Judicial Proceeding - it is a medium or means by which a fact is proved or disproved. Proof – RESULT‚ EFFECT or PERFECTION of an evidence. - result of a PROBATIVE EFFECT of evidence. - it is the perfection of evidence
Premium Evidence law Legal burden of proof
of a life by trial in law; said person is the judge of the court system. A judge safeguards the law and holds the power of a god. Judges have left their mark throughout history by writing it themselves. The Salem Witch Trials are one of the nation’s most notorious cases of mass hysteria. Upwards of 150 people were accused and sent to trial. A judge would hear these trials and then choose life or death for these men and women. Only an effective judge should be placed in such a position where one can
Premium Crime Law Prison
has been a notion that judges make law.A judge is a public official appointed or elected to hear and decide legal matters in court[2]‚ Judges exercise judicial power. This involves making binding decisions affecting the rights and duties of citizens and institutions. In carrying out this task‚ a judge can use any of the following three sources of Ugandan law‚ Acts of Parliament or legislation‚ the common law‚ or previous decisions by the courts and a constitution Do judges make law? To ask the question
Free Common law Law Precedent
such thing as judge-made law‚ for the judges do not make the law‚ though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not previously been authoritatively laid down that such law is applicable.” Generally‚ the position judges adopted is to interpret the law instead of concerning with the justice of their decisions. In modern tie‚ there is still existence of powerful ideology that denies any creative role to judges. The popular view of the judges is not to give
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
What is the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence? Give two practical examples of each. Direct evidence proves a fact without interference and does not require any reasoning to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence. Basically it can prove a fact by itself. Everything a witness saw‚ heard‚ found‚ etc. are examples of direct evidence. -A customer was present when they robbed the supermarket‚ he witnessed the event. -A person saw through the window when the criminal
Premium Crime Criminal law Murder
provide an appropriate answer to the question that you then defend in the rest of the essay. In other words‚ you must explain why your answer to the question is the best answer available by defending‚ clarifying and explaining your claim and (if needed) refuting opposing claims. As you do so‚ you want to make sure that you defend your claim primarily with direct biblical evidence and properly footnoted quotes and paraphrases from Essence of the Old Testament‚ although you may use properly footnoted
Premium David Solomon Kingdom of Israel