Judicial Appointments For Fast Track Courts 2002 Under Article 139 - A of the Constitution of India 06.05.2002 Brij Mohan Lal Vs. Union of India and Other s With T.C. (C) No. 23 / 2001. SLP (C) No. 7870.10645 of 2001 and T.P. (C) No. 407 - 410 of 2001 Case Summary A case relating to the establishment and functioning of Fast Track Courts‚ which came into existence for the speedy disposal of long pending Sessions cases. The Eleventh Finance Commission allocated Rs.502.90 crores under the
Premium Judge Bench
regular annual address to Congress that the era of colonization was over in the Americas and that the European powers were not to interfere in the new Latin American republics. Since Monroe said it‚ this "doctrine" was named after him. The Monroe Doctrine could be said to be a self-protection doctrine because the noncolonization part was mainly directed at the Russian who were expanding down the west coast and if they were stopped‚ the United States would be guaranteed access to the Pacific Ocean. The
Premium United States
appointment. This process will necessitate for fairness and overall competence in service delivery. The reasons why this system is deemed fit are: • This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination of the partisan politics‚ political sponsorship as well as the influence of money when compared to the method that is currently in use. • Regarding the decision making‚ the appointed judge under this pretext
Premium Supreme court Judge Court
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA ON 11.08.2014 Bill No. 96 of 2014 THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL‚ 2014 A BILL to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments Commission for recommending persons for appointment as the Chief Justice of India and other Judges of the Supreme Court and Chief Justices and other Judges of High Courts and for their transfers and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-fifth
Free Judge Court
Sermon of the Mount v Buddhism Doctrines Buddhism arose in the eastern part of central Asia‚ the Tibet region‚ round the fifth century before the born of Christ. Its founder‚ Buddha‚ was an Indian native known by the name of Siddhartha Gautama. In search of spiritual discipline‚ he sought until he achieved what he believed some kind of enlightenment. After which he dedicated his life to pass his Bohdi‚ perfect knowledge‚ to others. Many centuries on‚ Buddhism is widely spread among the highly
Premium Buddhism Gautama Buddha Theravada
August 2012 JUDICIAL REFORM IN THE PHILIPPINES [Speech delivered during the Central Luzon Regional Convention of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines‚ June 29‚ 2012] Antonio T. Carpio Senior Associate Justice‚ Supreme Court President Roan Libarios‚ Central Luzon Governor Olivia Velasco-Jacoba‚ other Governors and Officers of the IBP‚ fellow members of the IBP‚ my co-workers in the Judiciary and in Government‚ friends‚ a pleasant morning to you all. I wish to thank you for inviting me this morning
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Judge Court
Crystal Jennings Professor S. Bond CRJ 220 9 June 2013 Ethics of Means and Ends It’s an ethical dilemma that stands before every criminal justice professional because we shape‚ restrain‚ and reform the lives of our society’s convicts‚ both inside and outside of prison walls. In this way‚ we impact the lives of every member of our nation. Ethical dilemmas are everyday challenges‚ but how they are handled says a lot about you and the position that you hold as a criminal justice professional. The expectation
Premium Ethics Law
v nmsb Print the below income declaration on the Non-Judicial Stamp Paper (Rs. 10/-) INCOME DECLARATION FORM |Name of the Student CHINTHAMALLA GOUTHAM KRISHNA | |1. |(i) Name of the Father | |SOMAIAH |4. |Business mention the trade/name of business
Premium Apartment House Household income in the United States
Plain View Doctrine Misty Basford Kaplan University Plain View Doctrine This rule gives police officers the ability to seize evidence involved in a crime without a warrant if the evidence is in plain sight. This rule is limited by probable cause which requires police officers to have probable cause and believe the items in plain view are evidence before they seize them. The fourth amendment does prevent unreasonable searches and seizures. There are two ways the rule can be used. 1. The officer
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
The judicial philosophies of the justices in the United States Supreme Court differ from one another. These philosophies are depended on the justices personal experiences and ideologies they grew up with. We find some are on the liberal side‚ some are conservative‚ while others are more on the moderate side. The liberal judges believe that the U.S constitution is a living document. This means that the Constitution should be open to modification and modernization according to the demands of contemporary
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Political philosophy