present the arguments of two philosophers about the definition of “good”. First‚ I will present Moore’s argument that “good” is indefinable. Then‚ I will present Geach’s response to this and how he can undermine Moore’s argument. Next‚ I will discuss in what sense Geach believes “good” can be defined. Finally‚ I will discuss my opinion on who has the correct definability of “good” and give reasons to defend my opinion. Moore sets the groundwork by first defining the province of ethics. He proposes
Premium Good and evil English-language films Virtue
Question: In his development of the concept of hegemony‚ Gramsci is concerned to investigate‚ among other things‚ how a dominant class wins free consent of a subordinate class. Using his analysis‚ write an essay on how patriarchy might establish hegemony. Use no more than two religious traditions to provide concrete illustrations of your argument. In order to understand Gramsci and the concept of hegemony‚ one has to look briefly at the work of Karl Marx. Marxism viewed everything in life as
Premium Marxism Ideology Karl Marx
which he outlines his Ontological argument in the form of a prayer spoken directly to God. As a firm believer in God‚ Anselm wished to prove God’s existence and confirm his strong faith by using logic and reason. The Ontological argument is a priori and is based on deductive reasoning because it seeks to prove the existence of God from the understanding of the attributes of the God of classical theism. Chapter Two of the Proslogion introduces Anselm’s argument. The first part of the argument focuses
Premium Ontology Existence Metaphysics
begin. The point when the universe is created. I. Cosmological Argument It has lead philosophers to figure out how the universe was created‚ which lead them to use the cosmological argument‚ which is the argument of pattern in argumentation (logos) that makes an inference from certain alleged
Premium Metaphysics God Existence
is a clear indication of a third generation immigrant identity. They don’t feel so much concerned about their belonging or non-belonging. Ali Yunis’ also reflected much of her thought in her character. We find most of her characters in The Night Counter pay less head to “home syndrome”. On the one hand‚ home is a mythic place of desire in the diasporic imagination (Raj 89).On the other hand‚ home cannot be conceived by dwelling in the past; home rather has to be the lived experience of one’s locality
Premium Cultural identity Identity Diaspora politics
The author states that there are arguments provide strong suport for the truth of Peary’s claim of reaching the North Pole and provides three reasons. However‚ the professor states that there is no solid evidence and the arguments are not convincing and he opposes each of the author’s reasons. First‚ the reading claims that The committe concluded that Peary’s accounts were consistent and persuasive. In contrast‚ the professor refutes this pint by saying that it’s true that the committe declaired
Premium Critical thinking Logic Scientific method
Jacqueline Smudzinski Thinking and Writing 1302-60 Bouchard September 29‚ 2013 The Grateful Dead “You’ve got to listen to the heavens‚ you got to try to understand. The greatness of their movement is just as small as it is grand.” Most young adults of my generation do not know who The Grateful Dead are‚ but they unknowingly dawn the apparels and slang created in the counterculture of the bands following the Deadheads. The band‚ The Grateful Dead‚ became popular in the 60s and carried out wide
Premium
Glossary An argument web is an argument which is both multi-reason and multi-layer. A chain of reasoning is a multi-layer argument. Usually the term is applied to arguments with more than two layers. A claim is a proposition put forward by somebody as true. A proposition is an idea which is either true or false. Collectively exhaustive (CE): Within a group‚ considerations should cover all the relevant‚ serious arguments; they should leave no gaps. CE is the second aspect of the MECE rule. A conclusion
Premium Logic Argument map Argument
In this paper I will explain Socrates’ agreement at 50 a-b of the Crito‚ and explain my reason why would not cause his fellow citizens harm by breaking the law. Specially I will show that people can actually create a positive. I will explain that Socrates argument and show how depends on how what the unjust causes. Then I will argue that this assumption is to be questioned under the fact that citizens are not necessarily affected by the law breakers‚ and that by doing something unjust can be moral
Premium Plato Law
THE MORAL ARGUMENT How do we explain the fact that people often refrain from immoral acts even when there is no risk of their being caught? There are many formulations of the moral argument but they all have as their starting point the phenomenon (fact) of moral conscience. In essence the moral argument poses the question: where does our conscience‚ our sense of morality come from if not from God? It also asserts that if we accept the existence of objective moral laws we must accept the existence
Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant