1. Hospital Order Under provisions of Section 37 of the MHA‚ a person convicted of an imprisonable offence could be eligible for a hospital order. This order would give the authority for him to be admitted to a specified hospital‚ where he would be detained under the conditions as set by the Act‚ for treatment. Under the 1983 MHA the Courts were bound by the four categories as described by the Act‚ and they required to be satisfied‚ based on expert evidence‚ that the individual was suffering
Premium Law Judge Jury
The Law‚ Contracts and Me Laws are made by legislatures and judges‚ although there is no universally accepted definition for law‚ one definition states that law is a system of rules and guidelines which are enforced through social institutions to govern behavior. [Lord Lloyd of Hampstead. Introduction to Jurisprudence. Third Edition. Stevens & Sons. London. 1972. Second Impression. 1975. Page 39.] In a society‚ rules and regulations exist in order to control peace and order‚ without these rules
Free Law Contract Breach of contract
is totally dependent on her to look after him. Johnny loves his daughter and does whatever she tells him to do. Two months ago‚ Johnny transferred all his property to Victoria. He passed away a few days ago. Joe claims that the contract is voidable. Discuss. Answer: The issues that arise in this case are: 1) Whether there is a relationship between Johnny and Victoria? 2) Whether Victoria used her dominant position to transfer all of Johnny’s property to her? 3) Whether Joe has
Premium Family Mother Father
false or not – objective test Step 2. Three possibilities of a misrepresentation: 1) It is a term of the contract; 2) It constitutes a collateral contract; 3) Does not acquire contractual status at all. Step 3. Results: 1) Rescission of the contract; 2) Damages in tort (if the tort of deceit or the tort of negligence can be made out) Smith v Lane & House Property Corp This case deals with the situation that a statement of opinion leads to a misrepresentation. Two possibilities: 1)
Premium Contract Contract law
1. Examine‚ with reference to relevant case law‚ the extent to which it is true to say that in the event of a breach of contract the injured party can recover compensation for all of the consequences‚ both financial and non-financial‚ that result from the breach. The following question asks us to what extent it is right to say that in the event of breach of contract the injured party can recover compensation for all of the consequences‚ both financial and non-financial. In this essay
Premium Law Employment
1. INDIAN C0NTRACT ACT 1872 Introduction: We enter into contracts day after day. The Law of Contract is comboided in the Indian Contract Act‚ 1872. The contract act incorporates many features of English Law. What is a Contract ? Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act 1872 defines a as an agreement enforceable by law. Section 2(e) defines agreement as “every set of promises forming consideration for each other. Section 2 defines promises in these words ‚ when the person to whom the proposal
Premium Contract
Procurement Law Overview‚ Part Two Procurement and Contract Law Procurement Law Overview‚ Part Two Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contract clause permits the government to partially compensate contractors for supply and services which have been accepted by the Government‚ as long as the contractor demand it and the sum is no less than $1‚000 or 50% of the full contract amount. These interim payments diminish the contractor needs to finance expenses to fulfill the contract. As permitted
Premium Contract Cost Price
UNIT 2: OFFER TUTORIAL SHEET 2 1. What is an offer? 2. Explain the two (2) types of offer? 3. Distinguish between an offer and an invitation to treat. 4. What types of communication do not constitute an offer? 5. Explain each type of communication identified in (4) above. 6. When is an offer effective? 7. Explain the difference between a counter- offer and request for information. 8. Explain whether each of the following is a bilateral offer‚ unilateral offer or not an
Premium Invitation to treat Contract Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
UCC Team Boys and a Chick Law/421 11/3/12 Mr. Marmo Uniform Commercial Codes 1) Does article 2 of the UCC apply to the contracts between Grocery Inc and their vendors? Yes. In the scenario Grocery Inc is in contract with multiple vendors‚ both private (individual) and corporate vendors. Article 2 covers the sale of goods. Goods meaning that they can be moved during the time of purchase such as food products (Lawinfo.com‚ 2012). The UCC does not cover services like a membership
Premium Common law Contract Uniform Commercial Code
treated as part of one big family. After several years‚ Tan decided to sell his 55% stake in Achem to Union Pte Ltd (Union) because he was excited about a different business opportunity. Initially‚ Tan had planned to sell his shares to Union and exit Achem’s board. Heng and Union thought it would be useful to keep Tan on Achem’s board as he had many business contacts. He agreed to remain as director of Achem on account of his friendship with Heng and received nly a nominal director’s fees per annum
Premium Tort law Standard of care Reasonable person