the respondents are between 30-35 age group‚16% of the respondents are between 35-40 age group‚12% of the respondents are below 25 age group and 8% of the respondents are above 40 age group. Nearly 40% of the customers are using nokia mobile phones are within 25-30 years of age 4.1.1 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION [pic] 4.2 SEX Sex also play a vital role in usage of Mobile phones . satisfaction level varies between both the sex. Table 4.2 shows the sex wise classification
Premium Nokia Mobile phone
of the reasons Nokia has fallen so fast is that it has a simple branding problem: Nokia isn’t a distinctive brand. It is a brand with positive associations and high awareness‚ but it isn’t unique. For many years‚ Nokia seemed to successfully do what marketing experts say you can’t do: serve all segments in a market. Nokia sold very high-end‚ technologically advanced phones and simple‚ inexpensive phones‚ all under the Nokia brand. The branding structure was very simple: the Nokia brand with a product
Premium Marketing
Introduction The company that we choose from the list is Nokia. Over the past 150 years‚ Nokia has evolved from a riverside paper mill in southwestern Finland to a global telecommunications leader connecting over 1.3 billion people. During that time‚ they’ve made rubber boots and car tires. They’ve generated electricity. They’ve even manufactured TVs. Nokia Corporation is a Finnish multinational communications and information technology corporation that is headquartered in Espoo‚ Finland
Premium Nokia Smartphone Mobile phone
COUNTRY REPRESENT •Finnish Company •Nokianvirta river Nokia‚ Finland YEAR OF BIRTH Company started in 1865 as wood pulp mill. After 1963 Nokia started producing radio telephone COMPANY PRODUCT Early products: Wood pulp Rubber Cables and Television Main Product: Mobile Phone‚ Smart Phone‚ Mobile Computers‚ etc. FOUNDER OF THE COMPANY •The company was initially founded by Fredrik Idestam in 1865 •But it was later converted into a share company
Free Mobile phone Nokia
1.1 The Morph concept The “Nokia Morph” is a theoretical future device based on nanotechnology that might enable future communication devices. It is intended to demonstrate the flexibility of future mobile devices‚ in regards to their shape and form allowing the users to transform them according to their preference. It demonstrates the ultimate functionality that nanotechnology might be capable of delivering i.e. flexible materials‚ transparent electronics and self-cleaning surfaces. It also features
Premium Nanotechnology
Microsoft and Nokia. This ‘transformation’‚ turning Microsoft into a ‘devices and services’ company‚ is key to the company’s continuing survival‚ and would be impossible without Nokia. Here are four reasons why the acquisition had to happen: Microsoft need to keep its momentum Recent industry figures have shown Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8 posting its highest ever market share allowing the mobile OS to leapfrog BlackBerry and become the third-most popular globally. This means that Windows Phone
Premium Smartphone Windows Mobile Microsoft
globalization‚ people can sell anywhere take advantage of a country’ resources (cheap labour‚ human intellect‚ lower taxes etc.) take advantage of a country’s less strict labour laws (ex. child labour) · Was the German backlash against Nokia justifiedadd your own opinion? How can nations make themselves more competitive? · New plant developed would be to maximize output in production to Europe‚ Middle East and Africa · Other manufacturers (ex. BenQ [bankrupt]‚ Motorola)
Premium Middle East Labour relations Supply and demand
Michael Porter in his article “The-competitive-advantage-of-nations-(1990)” discusses how a firm or a region can build competitive advantage and strategy. Porter argues that Competitive advantage is often not an outcome of favorable factor and macro-economic conditions as classical economists insists. A nation’s competitiveness depends on the ability of its industries to innovate. Porter introduces the concept of “the diamond of national advantage” - a system that some nations establish for its industries
Premium Mobile phone Public policy Nokia
| History 1865 to 1967 | | | Fredrik Idestam‚ co-founder of Nokia. | | Statesman Leo Mechelin‚ co-founder of Nokia. | The predecessors of the modern Nokia were the Nokia Company (Nokia Aktiebolag)‚ Finnish Rubber Works Ltd (Suomen Gummitehdas Oy) and Finnish Cable Works Ltd (Suomen Kaapelitehdas Oy).[13] Nokia’s history started in 1865 when mining engineer Fredrik Idestam established a groundwood pulp mill on the banks of the Tammerkoski rapids in the town of Tampere‚ in southwestern
Premium Nokia
Summary 2. Introduction 3. Internal Analysis of Nokia 3.1 PESTLE Analysis 3.2 Porters Five Forces 4. Analysis of Current Strategies 5. Recommendations 5.1 Ansoff’s Matrix 5.2 Marketing Strategy 5.3 Segmentation‚ Targeting and Positioning Strategies (STP) 5.4 Objectives 5.5 Analysis of Marketing Mix (7Ps) 5.6 References 6. Appendices 6.1 Appendix A 6.2 Appendix B 6.3 Appendix C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report analyses the current situation Nokia is facing within the industry internally and externally
Free Mobile phone Nokia