Asfar and Co v Blundell (1896) 1 QB 123 Court of Appeal (Lord Esher MR‚ Lopes and Kay LJJ) Dates no longer merchantable as dates Facts A vessel‚ on board which dates had been shipped‚ was sunk during the course of the voyage‚ and subsequently raised. On arrival at the port of discharge it was found that‚ although the dates still retained the appearance of dates‚ and although they were of some value for the purpose of distillation into spirit‚ they were so impregnated with sewage and in such a
Premium Shipping Cargo Transport
Why have McDonald’s super-sized co-branding? In this essay‚ we seek to give a balanced informative diagnosis of how in recent years McDonald’s have tried to recreate and re-sculpt its brand image in the mindset of its customers and society as a whole. In particular‚ we want to focus our attention on how McDonald’s has adopted the marketing strategy known as co-branding to draw on the benefits of already well-established brands. “Despite being in the midst of an obesity crisis‚ it has done little
Premium Brand Brand equity
v. Cruikshank (1876). This case took place during the Reconstruction period of the south in Grand Parish‚ Louisiana. During this time there were many changes being made in the state and local government positions. In 1873 the governor of Louisiana appointed
Premium United States Constitution United States United States Bill of Rights
BlackBerry v. Co-Founders After announcing open for purchase‚ BlackBerry has already agreed to a non-binding offer from Fairfax. Before the deadline (Nov.4) of Fairfax’s offer‚ BlackBerry can still accept higher offer from others‚ thus co-founders of BlackBerry‚ who own 8% shares of BlackBerry‚ are running a bid. Negotiation Environment Number of Parties: Two Parties. One is the rest 92% of BlackBerry’s shareholders (represented by the CEO and the board of BlackBerry). The other is a potential
Premium Stock market Stock Negotiation
U.S. v. Fior D ’Italia‚ Inc. 536 U.S. 238‚ 122 S.Ct. 2117 U.S.‚2002. June 17‚ 2002 (Approx. 17 pages) |[pic] | 536 U.S. 238‚ 122 S.Ct. 2117‚ 153 L.Ed.2d 280‚ 89 A.F.T.R.2d 2002-2883‚ 70 USLW 4539‚ 70 USLW 4565‚ 2002-2 USTC P 50‚459‚ 2002-2 C.B. 875‚ Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 16736B‚ 02 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5315‚ 2002 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6699‚ 15 Fla. L. Weekly
Premium Internal Revenue Service Taxation in the United States Tax
8402 date issued January 17‚ 2013 Indexed as MacDonald v. Najafi and another (No.2) 2013 BCHRT 13 Facts The case I picked was heard on June 18 to19‚ 2012 in front of Murray Geiger Adams who is a member of the tribunal. The claimant is Ms. Macdonald‚ who is a university grad that moved to Vancouver from Calgary. The respondents are Mr. Najafi and his company Sign-A-Rama based in Vancouver. Mr. Najafi’s has adult children and is in his 60’s lived in Iraq for 40 years then moved to Canada in 1995
Premium Discrimination Vancouver
NATURE V/S NURTURE Good morning‚ ladies and gentlemen. My name is and I am standing here in front of you all to present to you my opinions about the topic “Nature v/s Nurture”. Considering it‚ the foremost question that comes to mind is what exactly is nature and nurture? My dear listeners‚ nature and nurture are a convenient jingle of words‚ for it separates under two distinct heads the innumerable elements of which personality is composed. Nature is all that
Premium Nature versus nurture
Chappell & Co Ltd v The Nestlé Co Ltd [1959] 2 All ER 701 House of Lords Nestlé‚ manufacturers of wrapped chocolate bars‚ advertised for sale‚ as part of an advertising campaign‚ the record ’Rockin’ Shoes’. The price of the record was 1s 6d plus three wrappings from their 6d chocolate bars. Chappell‚ who were the sole licensees of the copyright of ’Rockin’ Shoes’‚ claimed that Nestlé had infringed their copyright and sought injunction and damages. Nestlé claimed that they were entitled to
Premium Gramophone record Contract Sales
corporation was started in 1940 and has since grown as a fast food entity‚ with restaurants and supply outlets all over the world. Maurice and Richard McDonald started a Bar-B-Q restaurant in San Bernardino‚ the United States in 1940(“McDonald’s History”). In 1948‚ they introduced the “Speedee Service System” and the CEO Ray Kroc established the McDonald’s System Inc. in Illinois in 1955. In addition‚ the name “McDonald’s System Inc.” was changed to McDonald’s Corporation in1960. However‚ the two brothers
Premium Ethics Communication
management experience. The last benefit of this model is the chance of the company to identify and develop the locations‚ polices quality‚ and develops new products. Operations are large scale and efficient. Weaknesses of McDonald’s model Sharing profits McDonald and the franchisee seek to earn profits over a long period of time so the revenues must be fixed and sufficient to share profits among them. Loss of absolute control MacDonald doesn’t have the complete right to manage or take decisions alone. So
Premium Franchising Business model Marketing