Fiduciary Responsibility Shana Bates City University of Seattle Business Ethics Amy Thiele June 20‚ 2014 Introduction This paper discusses in detail the issue of fiduciary responsibility. A fiduciary relationship describes an association in which an individual is vested with the obligation of caring for another person’s rights or property. The fiduciary relationship is supposed to be a very special and confidential association where the fiduciary must be honor-bound to legally accomplish
Premium Fiduciary Trustee Board of directors
May 8‚ 2012 Beneficence in Medical Ethics The principle of beneficence is found in the Hippocratic Oath‚ which provides that “physicians will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to (their) ability and judgment; and to keep the sick from harm and injustice.” (Jonathan F. Will‚ 2011) Our textbook claims that the Hippocratic Oath expresses an obligation of nonmaleficence and an obligation of beneficence: “I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability
Premium Health care Health care provider Ethics
Directors’duties(dd): I.Duties of care and diligence:1whether is a director(d)?s9definesas:(a)appointed:(i)executive director(ii)alternative director(iii)non-executive director(iv)nominee director.(b) not validly appointed (i)they act in the position of a d (de facto d);(ii)d of coy or body are accustomed to act in accordance with the person’s instructions or wishes. (shadow d).2.duty of care and diligence:Assessing whether a breach has occurred:(i)were a reasonable d in the corp’s circumstances
Premium Board of directors Bankruptcy Fiduciary
partnership’s contracts with the independent-contractor auditors and signed many of these auditors with his new firm. The partnership terminated about 11 months after Fial wrote the letter to Steeby. Steeby brought an action against Fial‚ alleging breach of fiduciary duty and seeking a final accounting. Who wins? Steeby v. Fial‚ 765 P.2d 1081‚ Web 1988 Colo.App. Lexis 409 (Court of Appeals of Colorado) PARTIES In the Steeby vs. Fial case Roger Steeby is the plaintiff and Charles Fial is the defendant. Steeby
Premium Fiduciary Audit Asset
activities in the government-wide financial statements‚ but quite different from the current financial resources measurement focus and modified accrual basis of accounting used in the governmental funds. 3. Fiduciary activities of a government involve the government’s discharge of its fiduciary responsibilities‚ either as an agent or trustee‚
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Government Fiduciary
Directors: Qualification/disqualification‚ appointment‚ duties and liabilities of directors. Also‚ explain ‘independent directors’ and their responsibilities. Company law in Malaysia is governed by Companies Act 1965. This Act is modelled on English Companies Act 1948 and Australian Uniform Companies Act 1961. Therefore‚ references will be made to English and Australian cases for interpretation of the law on certain areas. In every company there are directors to manage and direct the company.
Premium Board of directors Fiduciary Corporate governance
Subcommittee ******************************************************************** Corporate Governance and Fiduciary Duties A Multi-Jurisdictional Review of the Directors’ Relationship to the Corporation The International Developments Subcommittee is in the process of preparing a analysis of the board of director’s relationship to the corporation‚ comparing concepts of fiduciary duty and other concepts of director duties in civil law and common law jurisdictions. This compilation contains
Premium Common law Corporation Board of directors
1 Issues: Whether EF ( Ever Fresh Sdn bhd ) could claim against Fruity? Laws & Applications; The term fiduciary does not have a precise definition. Fiduciary is a term that may cover a wide range of situations where a person is expected to act‚ not in their own self interest but having regards to another’s interest. Fruity as the managing director of Freshness Always Sdn Bhd (FA) has no fiduciary in relation with FA by telling Cellar that FA would not be interested because it only sells fruits and
Premium Fiduciary Board of directors Stock
Contents Introduction 3 1. Doctrinal bases of liability 4 1.1. Reasonable Care and Skill . 4 1.2. Fiduciary Law 5 1.3. Knowing Receipt‚ Inconsistent Dealing‚ and Assistance 6 1.4. Emerging Standard: Due Diligence‚ Suitability‚ Good Faith 7 2. Duty to advise and the liability for the advice given 8 2.1. Duty to advise 8‚ 9 2.2. Liability for advice given 10 Referencing 12 Introduction In this report I defined the duties and liabilities of a Banker under Advisory
Premium Trustee Fiduciary Common law
Brian Pty Ltd（1985）HCA 49；157 CLR 1 This is an appeal which is against the decision upholding the previous appeal. While the legal issue is that whether UDC who is the appellant in this case had fiduciary relationship with Brian who is the first respondent and whether UDC acted in the breach of its fiduciary duty to Brian. Actually‚ the fact of the case is that UDC‚ SPL and others got involved into two arranged development of land which turned into one shopping center with contribution from all
Premium Lawyer Fiduciary Trustee