Supreme Court of the Philippines The Supreme Court of the Philippines (Filipino: Kataas-taasang Hukuman ng Pilipinas) is the country’s highest judicial court‚ as well as the court of last resort. The court consists of 14 Associate Justices and 1 Chief Justice. Pursuant to the Constitution‚ the Supreme Court has "administrative supervision over all courts and the personnel thereof".[1] The Supreme Court complex occupies the corner of Padre Faura Street and Taft Avenue in Manila‚ with the main building
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Court
09/08/2014 Mini Case Investing in TUFS This case is about a company that goes by the name of Northern Insurance . Who makes a large investment on Technical Underwriting Financial System which goes by a short name
Free Insurance Underwriting
to control the US market. TEACHING OBJECTIVES The main teaching objectives of the case are: 1. To understand the complexities that accompany the protection of a commodity like steel. 2. To illustrate how protectionist governmental policies can often hurt the very country they are designed to help. 3. To show that government intervention is usually ineffective and counterproductive. This case can be most effective when used after Chapter 8‚ describing the issues of governmental intervention
Premium Federal government of the United States Protectionism President of the United States
AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURE OF DEVELOPING ADR PROCESSES: MINI-TRIALS‚ SUMMARY TRIAL AND EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION PRESENTED BY: OBOH‚ OWOCHE G AUGUST 2014. HIGHLIGHTS: A perspective on developing ADR Processes Mini-trials: Concept‚ Principles‚ Procedure‚ and Concerns Summary Jury trial: Concept‚ Principles‚ Procedure‚ and Concerns Early Neutral Evaluation: Concept‚ Principles‚ Procedure‚ and Concerns Comparative distinctions Conclusion A PERSPECTIVE
Premium Alternative dispute resolution Negotiation Dispute resolution
dated September 30‚ 2011 and the resolution dated February 15‚ 2012 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 117361‚ which dismissed the petition filed by 3rd Alert Security and Detective Services‚ Inc. (3rd Alert). The Antecedent Facts This case started from an illegal dismissal complaint filed by Romualdo Navia against 3rd Alert. On November 30‚ 2005‚ the labor arbiter issued a decision that Navia’s dismissal was illegal. 3rd Alert appealed to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC)
Premium Appeal Employment Supreme Court of the United States
1994 TERESITA P. ARELLANO‚ petitioner‚ vs. JUDGE NAPOLEON R. FLOJO‚ FELINO BANGALAN‚ Clerk of Court III‚ HERMINIO DEL CASTILLO‚ RTC-OCC.; LUCINO JOVE‚ Deputy Sheriff‚ respondents. Wilfredo O. Paraiso for petitioner. Tumaru‚ Guerrero & Tumaru Law Offices for respondents Judge Bangalan and Sheriff Jove. R E S O L U T I O N MELO‚ J.: Teresita P. Arellano‚ defendant in Civil Case No. 11-1041 then pending before Branch 6 of the Regional Trial Court of the Second Judicial Region and stationed in Aparri
Premium Appellate court Legal terms Jury
Macro Economics DETAILED PROJECT REPORT India trade relation with South- Africa ACKNOWLEDGEMENT “Perseverance inspiration and motivation have always played a key role in success of any venture”. I hereby express my deep sense of gratitude to all the members involved directly and indirectly in this project work. I would thank to God for their blessing and my parents also for their valuable suggestion
Premium South Africa Africa International trade
Vanraj Mini Tractors ____________________________________________________________ ______________________ 1. Product Analysis: The 10 HP Vanraj Mini Tractor offers a new option to the tractor market where most of the existing players are catering to the needs of the big and commercial farms. The technology is built such that it offers cost benefits‚ fuel efficiency‚ availability of spare parts‚ easy maintainability‚ high manoeuvrability and compatibility with various farming implements. Also
Premium Cost-benefit analysis Farm
G.R. No. 118295 May 2‚ 1997 WIGBERTO E. TAÑADA and ANNA DOMINIQUE COSETENG‚ as members of the Philippine Senate and as taxpayers; GREGORIO ANDOLANA and JOKER ARROYO as members of the House of Representatives and as taxpayers; NICANOR P. PERLAS and HORACIO R. MORALES‚ both as taxpayers; CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION‚ NATIONAL ECONOMIC PROTECTIONISM ASSOCIATION‚ CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES‚ LIKAS-KAYANG KAUNLARAN FOUNDATION‚ INC.‚ PHILIPPINE RURAL RECONSTRUCTION MOVEMENT‚ DEMOKRATIKONG
Premium World Trade Organization International trade General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
MINI CASE: THE FILURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AT ENRON 1.Which parts of the corporate governance system‚ internal and external‚ do you believe failed Enron the most? In the evaluation of the Enron’s case; by trying to see the very big picture‚ it is not only about that the internal part of the corporate governance system was failed or but also the external part of the corporate governance system was also failed. As noted on the last paragraph of the mini case‚ many people from different positions
Premium Corporate governance Enron Corporation