Current Ratio Interpretation From the calculation of the current ratio it is evident that the company’s current ratio for the year 2010 is 1.30:1 ‚2011 is 1.80:1‚ 2012 is 1.54:1 and 2013 is a 1‚53:1‚ that is company’s current assets in year 2013 was Rs. 1.53 for every 1Re of current liability‚ while in the year 2012 the current asset was Rs 1.54 Re of its current liability‚ while in the year 2011 the current assets was Rs 1.80 Re of its current liability‚ and while in the year 2010 the
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Asset Balance sheet
Ratio Analysis Memo July 9‚ 2012 Memo To: From: Date: July 9‚ 2012 RE: Kudler Fine Foods ratio analysis One of the things that we will be going over is some of the ratios for Kudler Fine Foods through Liquidity‚ Profitability‚ and solvency ratios. We will look into some of the finding that were found through these ratios and discuss them. One of the things that we found was where Kudler Fine Foods’ position is with these ratios. The first area that we look at is profitability
Premium Balance sheet Asset Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Current Ratio 2012 (‘000) 2013 (‘000) (Current Asset)/(Current Liabilities) (Current Asset )/( Current Liabilities) = (RM 308‚510)/RM161‚786 = RM337‚728/(RM 222‚768) = 1.91 : 1 = 1.52 : 1 The table above shows that Dutch Lady has a decreased
Premium Balance sheet Asset Inventory
Liquidity Ratios: Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities Efficiency Ratios Asset Turnover Ratio = Sales Revenue/ (Fixed Assets + Current Assets) Profitability Ratios Net Profit Margin = (Net Profit x 100) /Sales Revenue Return on Capital Employed = Net Profit (Operating Profit) x 100 (ROCE) Capital Employed Solvency Ratios Gearing Ratio = Total Liabilities/Shareholders Equity Investment Ratios Earnings per Share
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Financial ratios
Ratio decidendi and obiter dicta Learning objectives At the end of this module‚ you will be able to: * distinguish between ratio decidendi and obiter dicta. * apply well-established rules to identify the ratio decidendi in a decision. This module is intended as a useful exercise in revision. If you are certain that you understand how to discover the ratio in an opinion‚ you should skim lightly over this material. What is the ratio decidendi? As you probably recall from your studies
Premium Ratio decidendi Common law Law
Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond‚ Washington that develops‚ manufactures‚ licenses and supports a wide range of products and services related to computing. The company was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen on April 4‚ 1975. Microsoft is the world’s largest software maker measured by revenues. It is also one of the world’s most valuable companies. Microsoft was established to develop and sell BASIC interpreters for the Altair
Premium Microsoft Operating system
Google Case 1. Discuss competition in the search industry. Which of the five competitive forces seem strongest? weakest? What is your assessment of overall industry attractiveness? Competition in the search industry is high. There are several search engines available‚ albeit Google holds the top percentage. Some of Google’s opposing forces are Yahoo!‚ Bing‚ and MSN search. The strongest is competitive rivalry and the weakest is buyer power. There is a big rivalry amongst search engines
Premium Google Web search engine Bing
this industry competing with Google. I think the competition is tight because most of them are target the same market and conducting the similar business and technologies. The five major companies are Yahoo!‚ MSN‚ Baidu‚ Ask‚ and AOL. * Bargaining power of buyers- in both 2007 and 2008‚ 97% of Google’s revenues came from advertising business. The rest 3% of its revenues were made by other businesses. The advertisement customers have power to bargain because Google relies on its advertisement sales
Premium Advertising Google Google search
Learning outcome (LO1): Understand the relationship between organizational structure and culture. Deadline: Saturday – Oct‚ 26th 2013 Task-1 1.1-Evaluate‚ analyze‚ compare and contrast the structure and culture for both organizations: Toyota and Google. Guidelines of task-1: 1. Draw the organizational structures for both organizations - You should be able to see the differences of the two organizational structures: Tall and short hierarchical structure‚ narrow and wide span of management‚ specialization
Free Structure Organization Hierarchy
Google Innovation And New Product Management Google products do not fair well on the market or do not reach the market at all as they would have failed during the trial stages because they hardly follow the proper steps in new product development. Therefore the question Google needs to ask itself before embarking on a project is whether or not a product is what the customer needs because what the engineers want to develop is not necessarily what people need. Therefore structured and analytic approaches
Premium Innovation Google New product development