Fisher v. University of Texas This case was granted writ of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday‚ February 21‚ 2012 and argued on Wednesday‚ October 10‚ 2012. The petitioner in this case is Abigail N. Fisher and the respondent is the University of Texas at Austin. Fisher filed suit with the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the court decided in favor of the University of Texas. The state of Texas has legislature that was enacted
Premium Supreme Court of the United States University United States
Fisher v. University of Texas case main issue is the automatic admission of the top 10% of the high school class has the effect of privileging moderately bright students at a school full of poorly performing students over moderately bright students at schools full of excellent performers. Diversity is not a word that alone stands for concept of race. Rather the concept of diversity should be applied in regard to race‚ gender‚ and income. At an essential level colleges and courts should look at the
Premium United States Affirmative action College
judges of the supreme court gathered to analyze a challenge about the University of Texas of Austin’s race-conscious admissions program. This case‚ known as Fisher II v. The University of Texas‚ was brought about when senior Abigail Fisher applied to the University of Texas and did not get in. She was not accepted in the top ten percent program as well( a program in Texas Law stating that top ten percent students from all schools in Texas get automatic admission into UT Austin)‚ and firmly believed that
Premium Affirmative action
2012 Abigail Fisher vs University of Texas Have you ever once being denied of school admission cause of discriminated toward you? If you have‚ you made have been violated of your right. This is based on Equal Protection Clause that forbids state from passing laws depriving any person of life‚ liberty‚ or property without due process. The big factor of admission decision serves as a compelling interest in achieving diversity among its student body. Abigail Fisher filed law suit against
Premium Appeal Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
Abagail Fisher‚ a white female‚ applied for admission into the University of Texas. She was denied entrance because she did not qualify for Texas’ Top 10 Percent Plan. This plan guarantees entrance to the top ten percent of every graduating high school class in Texas. Miss Fisher sued the University of Texas because she claimed that the use of race in admissions to the college violated the Equal Protection Clause from the 14th Amendment. The case made it all the way up to the Supreme Court which
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
‚ Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 491 U.S. 397 Texas v. Johnson CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 88-155 Argued: March 21‚ 1989 --- Decided: June 21‚ 1989 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. After publicly burning an American flag as a means of political protest‚ Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted of desecrating a flag in violation of Texas law. This case presents the question whether his conviction is consistent with
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Texas v. Johnson (1989) In 1984‚ following a protest march through the streets of Dallas‚ Texas against the policies of the Reagan Administration‚ Gregory Lee Johnson was handed an American flag. Outside the Dallas City Hall‚ Johnson through the flag onto the ground‚ poured kerosene on it‚ and set fire to it. Many protesters around Johnson began a chant of‚ "America‚ the red‚ white‚ and blue‚ we spit on you!" While many protesters agreed with what Johnson had done‚ there were several others who
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
Texas v Johson The first amendment grants the citizens of the United States the right to speak freely‚ without legal persecution. Over the past 200 years since this amendment was enacted there have been hundreds of judicial cases devoted to interpreting and refining this law. One such case‚ reviewed by the United States ’ supreme court in 1988‚ was Texas v Johnson. The case involved Johnson ’s conviction of desecrating a venerated object (a Texas Statute) by burning a U.S. flag (Texas V Johnson(1989))
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
Mitch Carlson Steve Russell CRIM 331 Case Brief #1 Salinas v. Texas Facts & History On the morning of December 18‚ 1992‚ two brothers were shot and killed in their Houston home. Police were called by a neighbor who heard the gunshots‚ and then seen a “dark colored” car fleeing from the house. It was later found out that defendant‚ Genovevo Salinas‚ was at the residence where the murders took place the night before December 18th. When officers went to Salinas’ house‚ they arrived to a dark blue
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona
UNT · Institutional Compliance Mission Statement: To reinforce and support a culture at UNT System Institutions which builds compliance consciousness into their daily activities and operations throughout each area of our University and encourages each employee to conduct UNT System and campus business with the highest standards of honesty and integrity. Institutional Compliance is an independent arm of management with a mission of establishing an Institutional Compliance program that clearly demonstrates
Premium Management Psychology Social sciences