Joanne Casillas Advanced Legal Writing June 2‚ 2014 Gonzalez ex rel. v. Reno‚ 86 F. Supp. 2d 1167 (SD. Fla. 2000) Facts: The parties in this case are Elian Gonzalez with Lazaro Gonzalez and Attorney General Janet Reno. In November 25‚ 1999 the United States Coast Guard intercepted two fishermen who had rescued five- year- old Elian Gonzalez floating on an inner tube in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast from Florida. Elian’s mother had died during the voyage from Cuba to
Premium United States Constitution United States Supreme Court of the United States
their restraining effect. USA v. NFL * Furthered members’ collective economic interests‚ it is essential that competitive balance exists within the league and the outcome of games are uncertain. Philadelphia World Hockey Club Inc. v. Philadelphia Hockey Club Inc. * Teams do not share profits like members of a typical business partnership. * However to maintain the financial integrity of all member clubs‚ protect economically weaker teams from stronger ones‚ professional sports leagues
Premium Major League Baseball Cartel Trust
Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944‚ Combined;Newspaper Stories‚ Combined Papers Combined Source: Company Profiles and Directories;US Law Reviews and Journals‚ Combined;Federal & State Court Cases - After 1944‚ Combined;Newspaper Stories‚ Combined Papers Project ID: 7 of 8 DOCUMENTS CHRISTOPHER NADEL‚ by and through his next friend‚ BRENDA NADEL‚ his natural mother‚ EVELYN NADEL‚ and PAUL NADEL‚ Plaintiffs-Appellants‚ v. BURGER KING CORPORATION and EMIL‚ INC.‚ Defendants-Appellees
Free Product liability
Robert Whitlock‚ an Associate Professor of Medicine and the Director of the Botulism laboratory at the University‚ concluded the hay purchased from Kallestad and fed to the Rothings horses was contaminated with botulism. Rules: Under Martel Const. Inc v. State and Ehly v. Cady foreseeability is a factor in breach of contract claims in Montana. The horses getting botulism was not foreseeable. The hay The Rothings purchase of hay from Kallestad was a transaction in goods‚ so it may be governed by Montana’s
Premium Tort Contract law Implied warranty
CASE BRIEF Case: State of Missouri v. David R. Bullock‚ 03CR679889.MO‚ [www.courts.mo.gov/casenet] Facts: At the time of the filing of his appeal‚ Mr. David R. Bullock had been charged and convicted of attempted statutory rape (under RSMO 566.032 and 564.011) and attempted sexual exploitation of a minor (under RSMO 564.011 and RSMO 566.032). David R. Bullock engaged in several conversations via email and chat rooms with a Newton County Deputy Sheriff who was conducting a sting operation
Premium Appeal Law
Steve Hindi is the founder of S.H.A.R.K‚ a non-profit corporation that exposes organizations for inhumane practices on animals. Metro Parks Serving Summit County is owned by the government and operates public parklands. Metro Parks hired White Buffalo Inc. to cull deer during the winter and teach the Metro Parks rangers how to kill the deer through sharpshooting methods. The culling was supposed to occur in public places of the park‚ but when the park was closed to the public. S.H.A.R.K. planted nine
Free Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Case Brief 764 P.2d 1316 Supreme Court of New Mexico. Billie J. RODMAN‚ Petitioner–Appellant‚ v. NEW MEXICO EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT and Presbyterian Hospital‚ Respondents–Appellees. No. 17721.Nov. 30‚ 1988. Written By: Lawrence Pelkey Facts: Billie J. Rodman‚ Appellant was employed by Presbyterian Hospital as a unit secretary for eight years when‚ on Feb 17‚ 1987‚ she was terminated under hospital personnel policies following a “third corrective action” notice. Prior restrictions
Premium Employment Telephone call Telephone
The Private Movie Co.‚ Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. 1. What are the facts? The Private Movie Company (Efraim) sued Pamela Lee Anderson for $4.6 million for walking away from oral and written contracts. The defendant (Anderson) claims to have agreed to the contracts on the stipulation that the script would be revised concerning nudity and simulated sex scenes‚ and upon reading the final script and seeing simulated sex scenes still included‚ walked out. 2. What is the legal issue? The
Premium Contract Void Gentlemen's agreement
Sandy Cheng CASE BRIEFS Interhandel Case (Switz. v. U.S.)‚ 1959 I.C.J. 6 (Mar. 21) Case Facts The Interhandel case was brought before the Court by Switzerland on October 2nd‚ 1957 to declare that the United States was under an obligation to restore its assets which had been vested in the United States from 1942. In 1946‚ US and Switzerland entered an agreement called the Washington Accord that the US will unblock Swiss assets in the US. Interhandel is a Swiss company entered in the Commercial
Premium United States United States Declaration of Independence
unintentionally hurt another person is liable for the harm through intentional harm. Holdings: the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff of $2800. Rationale: the touch was the exciting or remote cause of the destruction of the bone. The case was a case of torts and it related to the assult and battery which the defendant should pay money for the plaintiff. The defendant has no proof of any other hurt‚ and the medical testimony seems to have been agreed that this touch or kick was
Premium Contract