U.S. v. Anderson‚ 154 F.3d 1232. In the case of Anderson‚ the defendant made sure to never let his tapes containing what he believed to be child pornography out of his possession. By keeping his on him at all times he was able to exercise more control over the items and maintain a greater expectation
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Memorandum TO: Professor William T. Jones FROM: Can Liu RE: Immar Medrano case DATE: July 13‚ 2016 Question Presented Are the actions of Immar Medrano‚ who was employed as a journeyman electrician by Marshall Electrical Contracting‚ Inc.‚ at the time of the automobile accident within the course and scope of his employment‚ thus entitling his family members to workers’ compensation benefits? Short Answer Yes. The actions of Immar Medrano at the time of the automobile accident are within the
Premium Automobile Driving under the influence Alcohol law
The article focuses on the case of Jill‚ a patient incapable of moving out of her mother’s house despite her fierce desire to do so. Whenever Jill seriously contemplated moving out‚ she would suffer from fear‚ angry outbursts‚ and defensiveness against herself and others. As the therapist begins working with Jill‚ they discover that Jill believed that if she were to physically leave her mother‚ her mother would die. This irrational thought was enhanced by the fact that‚ as a child‚ Jill stepped between
Premium Family English-language films Psychology
Groupon has overcome much resilience since its inception in 2008. After growing from 400 subscribers to over 200 million (in 2011)‚ Groupon has proved its strategy works. To the consumers‚ Groupon is a simple process in which they pick a deal they are interested in‚ enter their credit card information‚ and then wait to see if the deal tips with other purchasers. This waiting period‚ part of the fourth stage in the purchase decision process‚ is one of the most important parts for Groupon’s company
Premium Mobile phone Marketing Internet
The Loving case was based off of Richard and Mildred Loving’s marriage. Richard Perry Loving‚ a white construction worker‚ was born on October 29‚ 1933 in Central Point‚ Caroline County. Mildred Dolores Jeter‚ a mixed African American and Indian woman‚ was born on July 22‚ 1939 who was also born in Central Point‚ Caroline County. In the state of Virginia‚ the location in which they both had lived‚ there was a law called the Racial Integrity Act (“American...”). The Act restricted anyone of the opposite
Premium Crime Murder United States
results for which they are capable. Second‚ they appreciate the task’s need and execution want. Third‚ they understand the favored practices or technique for satisfying the doled out errands. Applying the part acknowledgment speculation to the Tornado case‚ when the gathering is created for a wander each one of the commitments and errands are to be laid out doubtlessly so that each associate acknowledge what they are accountable for and what is not strange from them. The unmistakable understanding of
Premium Sociology Decision making
than any other industry in the business world. This‚ along with the benefits and pricing issues‚ make this case‚ on Angiomax‚ an interesting one to analyze. In determining pricing‚ positioning‚ and target markets‚ it is important to not only understand the product but also look at competition and the chain of users‚ or the buyers‚ decision makers‚ and users‚ as all are very different in this case‚ as opposed to many industries when all three of these roles may be portrayed by the same individual(s)
Premium Marketing Medicine Health care
The case scenario starts off by stating that two employees of the hospital engaged in an exclusive contract. Since Ortiz agreement was to provide services to individuals in rural communities it ended up lowering the fees for the anesthesiologist so he decided to renegotiate his contract with the hospital which breached his original contract between the two of them causing the anesthetist services with the hospital. In turn leading to a lawsuit filed sharing that there was a violation made regarding
Premium Health care Patient Health care provider
Upon reviewing the client’s history and four sessions‚ I utilized the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders‚ Fifth Edition (2013) to better assess Robyn’s current diagnosis. Based on the information given‚ Robyn’s preliminary diagnoses include: V62.29 (Z56.9) Other Problem Related to Employment V60.0 (Z59.0) Homelessness Deferred Diagnosis includes: 309.9 (F43.22) Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety 301.83 (F60.3) Borderline Personality Disorder Differential Diagnosis includes:
Premium Anxiety Abnormal psychology Goal
is whether the police acquired this information via an unreasonable search. Katz v. United States (1967) guides our inquiry‚ and that case renders the drone surveillance consistent with the Fourth Amendment. In Katz‚ the Court held that covertly recording calls made in a public telephone booth violates the Fourth Amendment. Katz is relevant to the instant case because it sets forth
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Mobile phone Police