generally viewed as the same as a guilty plea in open court. There are several ways a confession can be deemed unconstitutional. For example‚ from the previous sections we learned about the exclusionary rule. Which states that any evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment is inadmissible in court. In addition to that comes forth the “Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine” which states not only is illegally obtained evidence excluded from court‚ this is to include evidence that is derived from
Premium Law Jury Criminal law
conscionability which confirms to be conscience. Unlike Unconscionable means unfair or unjust. In any law of a contract it means that the contract or the terms and conditions are unjust that the court will be forced to decline it. The contract should be found both procedurally and substantively unconscionable for the court to prove it unconscionability. (D.R. Horton‚ Inc. v. Green‚ 120 Nev. 549‚ 553‚ 96 P.3d 1159‚ 1162) (2004). Unconscionability can be described
Premium Contract Contract law Common law
of my phone calls and emails within 24 hours. 23. I require you to keep me apprised of the status of my case and any new developments as they arise in a very timely manner. Do not represent to the prosecutor that I will entertain any agreement without consulting me first. 24. I require you to immediately provide me with a copy of any and all paperwork you send out or receive pertaining to my case and do so with ample time for me to consult with the necessary individual(s) to make decisions about how
Premium Jury Testimony Lawyer
Criminal Court Cases What makes this country so great? Most people disagree on the answer to that question. Some say it’s the freedom of speech that we have. Others will say that it’s our ability to vote and elect who we want to lead us. This is all well and good‚ but what really sets our country apart from many others is our right to a speedy and public trial of our peers. Some governments in other parts of the world reserve the right to take any citizen right off of the street and place him
Premium Crime Criminal law Criminal justice
existing court rules. Some jurors may have a hardship or family emergency that may prevent them from serving; this would qualify under the court rules as a reason for dismissal for cause.
Premium Law Court Jury
Business Case Study: Siam Canadian Food Co.‚ Ltd By 510009196 Introduction of the Company : SIAM Canadian Foods‚ founded and managed by Jim Gulkin‚ is a Bangkok-based Canadian-owned company that has been involved in the seafood brokerage business for almost 10 years. It was started in April 1987 after Canadian Jim Gulkin quit his job in the oil industry and invested his life saving of Cdn$130‚000 in the business. When first starting out
Premium Food Investment Business
story about false allegation during child custody and divorce. One spouse points the finger at the other and receives a restraining order from the court. The wife or husband recognizes that doing this will‚ almost by default‚ give them custody of the children and exclusive use of the family home. The accused parent then must defend themselves in court and prove these allegations false. While false accusations are a legal mess‚ it is also terrible to have someone that you once shared a life make
Premium
secondary. Most companies in every industry aim to deliver great value in their products and services to maintain a competitive position food quality was found to be the most important factor contributing to customers’ overall satisfaction. (Yen-Soon‚ Moreo‚ Yeh‚ 2004). It is suggested that management should pay attention to the freshness‚ appearance‚ and nutrition of the food to increase the customers’ satisfaction Foodservice is the art and science of planning‚ preparing‚ cooking and serving of quality
Premium Customer service Restaurant Customer satisfaction
Court Cases McCulloch vs. Maryland – 1819‚ Maryland tried to tax the US Bank‚ a national bank. Resulted in Maryland’s law being declared illegal‚ because the states cannot tax a Federal institution. Gibbons vs. Ogden – 1824‚ gave Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. Ogden was running
Premium Law
False testimony has always been an undeniable issue in court cases. Walter McMillan was accused of sodomy. A word he did not even know the meaning of. He was then threatened to be lynched when he told the arresting officer that did not understand the meaning of the crime he was being accused of. “This provoked Tate‚ who unleashed a torrent of racial slurs and threats” (Stevenson‚ 2015‚ 48). Even though Officer Tate did not investigate the case or Walter’s background‚ he sent him to Holman Correctional
Premium Police Crime Constable