THE FORD CASE Executive Summary After carefully analyzing Ford’s existing supply chain I immediately became aware of its highly complex nature. This high level of complexity combined with other internal and external factors have pushed Ford to search for solutions in order to overcome the costly supply chain challenges that they are facing and may continue to face in the future. Ford’s major difficulty in their present system is: the inefficient control of
Premium Supply chain Customer service Supply chain management
Introduction Ford Motor Company is the second largest industrial corporation in the world‚ employing 370‚000 people in 200 countries across the world with revenue over $144 billion. The auto industry has become very competitive on a global level‚ forcing automobile companies to cut costs and stay competitive. In trying to remain competitive‚ Ford introduced a plan called Ford 2000. This was done to cut costs‚ streamline the organization and processes globally‚ and increase economies of scale
Premium Supply chain management Customer service Ford Motor Company
FORD MOTOR COMPANY: SUPLY CHAIN STRATEGY I. VIEWPOINT Teri Takai‚ Director of Supply Chain Systems at Ford Motor Company II. TIME CONTEXT Late 1990s III. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM How should the company use emerging information technologies (i.e. Internet technologies) and ideas from new high-tech industries to change the way it interacted with suppliers? IV. OBJECTIVE To be able to make the supply chain run smoothly by eliminating bottlenecking
Premium Ford Motor Company Supply chain Supply chain management
Principles of Management Henry Ford – A Great Innovator Submitted by: Souvik Chowdhury(05) Sachin Hegde (18) Kaustubh Patankar (34) Shishir Sahu (42) Shailendra Rumade (43) Rachana Vichare (54) Henry Ford In Early Days: Ford was born on July 30‚ 1863. He was the first child of the six children born to a farmer family in Dearborn‚ Michigan. A born tinkerer of mechanical equipments‚ Ford set off at the young age of sixteen to the nearby town of Detroit to work three years as a machinist’s apprentice
Premium Assembly line Henry Ford Ford Motor Company
Ford Pinto Case John Fraughton Jr. Taylor Gray Brenda Greenwell Christopher Macintyre Leanne Marks University of Phoenix MGT 216 March 17‚ 2010 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Recommended Solutions and Supporting Information to the Ford Pinto Case 3 Traffic Safety and Accident Data 4 Ethical Opinion 5 Influences from External Social Pressures 5 Case Examined with the Period Eye 6 Conclusion 8 References 9 Introduction Very few 20 to 30 year olds know of
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Automotive industry
dissenters felt that there was indeed a problem with sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) that could be solved only with the installation of a shift-interlock system‚ something the NHTSA was not willing to mandate on the basis of the Audi or isolated SUA cases that followed. However‚ SUA would reemerge in 2007 as another auto maker‚ Toyota experience the mysterious phenomenon. Toyota’s Issues Begin The Audi SUA problem unfolded quickly and furiously and quite nearly destroyed a brand. The problems
Premium Toyota Audi Ethics
SCMA Ford Motor Company Case Study Contents Executive Summary 2 Issue identification with Root Cause Analysis 3 Understanding Forecasts with the new Ford 2000 Projects 3 Ford’s current supplier base is excessive 4 Purchasing structure within the Ford organization 4 Environmental Factors 5 Alternatives 6 Keep its existing supply chain 6 Recommendation 6 Create a vertically integrated supply chain based on Dell’s model 6 Create a website for direct purchases 7 A pull system should be implemented
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain
THE FORD PINTO CASE: THE VALUATION OF LIFE AS IT APPLIES TO THE NEGLIGENCE-EFFICIENCY ARGUMENT Christopher Leggett Law & Valuation Professor Palmiter Spring‚ 1999 Abstract Text of Paper -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto’s due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues‚ most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company
– Business Ethics & Social Responsibility | Jan Ruder‚ Ph.D. November 11‚ 2007 2. It’s 1973 and I am the Recall Coordinator for Ford Motor Company. Field reports are coming in reporting the following: Rear-end collisions‚ Fires‚ and Fatalities. I must decide whether to recall the Pinto. (Case: Pinto Fires‚ Trevino & Nelson‚ p. 115) 3. Before the Pinto‚ Ford was immersed in an intense‚ internal struggle between “Bunky” Knudson and Lee Iacocca over the company’s product line. ● Major pressure
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Ford Mustang
Firestone Case Danger on the Highway: Bridgestone/Firestone¡¦s Tire Recall Bridgestone/Firestone‚ Inc.‚ based in Nashville‚ Tennessee‚ has been in the business of making tires since 1900‚ when Harvey Firestone founded the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company in Akron‚ Ohio. Firestone was acquired by Bridgestone USA‚ Inc.‚ a subsidiary of Tokyo-based Bridgestone Corporation‚ in 1990 for $2.6 billion. Today‚ the company markets 8‚000 different types and sizes of tires‚ and a host of other products. The
Premium Ford Motor Company