Business Ethics Ford Motor Company In the simplest form of utilitarianism‚ promoting the greatest pleasure for the greatest number of people; is a popular ethical business practice. Sometimes this utilitarian theory is considered a controversial theory of morality especially when linked to the cost-benefit analysis versus the risk-benefit analysis‚ ultimately eliminating the human quality of making business decisions. Ford Motor Company‚ Ford Pinto Case‚ is one of the most debatable utilitarian
Premium Ethics Business ethics Morality
A Financial Ratio Quarterly Trend Analysis of: Ford Motor Company Computations Line Item | Beginning of Year | | | | | Inventory | | | | $5‚901‚000 | | | | | Total assets | | | | $178‚348‚000 | | | | | Owners ’ equity | | | | $15‚028‚000 | | | | | Number of common shares | | 3‚816 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2012 | 6/29/2012 | 3/30/2012 | 12/30/2011 | | Line Item | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Annual | Current
Premium Ford Motor Company Balance sheet Asset
The Ford Pinto was a subcompact vehicle that Ford Motor Company manufactured from 1970- 1980. The Pinto caught on with consumers‚ and sales of the vehicle were high. However‚ serious problems quickly arose regarding the design of the Pinto. The gas tank on the vehicles was placed directly behind the rear axle instead of above it‚ with only nine inches of space between the gas tank and axle. Bolts were also placed close to the gas tank‚ increasing the risk that they could puncture the tank in an accident
Premium Ford Pinto
Case 5: The Case of the Ford Pinto Refer to this case‚ of about the Ford Pinto case‚ I have been read about this topic from web pages and forum that have been discuses. Here are some of studies that I have been made to finish this paper work in different aspects of ethics and professionalism. In the ‘Ford Pinto Case Study’‚ it seems clear that Ford management and its engineers did not intend to make an unsafe product‚ and that more than likely the outcome of their product resulted primarily from
Premium Ford Motor Company Ethics Ford Pinto
FORD CASE STUDY 1. Using competing values‚ assess why Ford is widely considered more effective than GM. How could GM have used the competing-values approach in the early 1980s to recognize that it had problems? • In case of Ford motors they were earlier implementing the Rational Goal Model that lays immense emphasis of higher level of productivity‚ efficiency and profit. The decision-making is centralized to the higher-level authority with very less or no participation from the lower level
Premium Decision making Ford Motor Company Henry Ford
Ford vs Chevrolet Ford and Chevrolet (Chevy) are in the automotive industry and have been in completion for many years start back in 1908‚ both companies started in the state of Michigan and have been battling it out for profits‚ market share and hometown bragging rights. Ford was founded in the suburb of Dearborn‚ Michigan and Chevy was founded in Flint‚ Michigan. Ford and Chevy both are good-producing sectors‚ they both manufacture automobiles that are similar but different. They each have
Premium Automotive industry General Motors Ford Motor Company
Running head: Ford Pinto Case Study – Was Ford to Blame in the Pinto Case? Taking a Side Mayo Smith‚ George Deese‚ Josh Eubank‚ Mignon Waller‚ Michelle Stower and Jaime Arnold University of Phoenix Take a Side Bad business decisions can be seen throughout history; however none has stirred such controversy as the error made by Ford Motor Credit concerning the 1971 Ford Pinto. Despite many safety concerns Ford CEO‚ Lee Iacocca and Ford executives began the production and distribution
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Station wagon
The Ford Pinto Case In the late 1960’s Ford Motor Company wanted to produce a small model car to compete with small Japanese and German imports like Volkswagen‚ Datsun and Toyota (Danley). In 1969 Ford’s Board approved the plan to produce the Pinto. The CEO‚ Lee Iacocca‚ wanted a car that was low weight‚ under 2‚000 pounds‚ and low cost‚ under $2‚000. Lee “Iaccoca imposed the 2000/2000 rule‚ i.e.‚ the Pinto could weigh no more than 2000 pounds and cost no more than $2000” (Danley). The engineers
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Ford Mustang
BuggsRuby Financial Reporting and Accounting February 5‚ 2013 GROUP PROJECT GM VS FORD Less than 60 years ago‚ on Jan. 17‚ 1956‚ Ford Motor(F) launched its IPO into an economy in which U.S. industrial might was the envy of the world and American cars represented the apex of the automotive pyramid. Today‚ as GM eases into its second go-around‚ the questionable future of industry and the shifting definition of "made in America" cast a dark shadow over the car company ’s public celebration
Premium Ford Motor Company General Motors Automotive industry
Statement………………………………………………………………………8 C. Current Situation………………………………………………………………………9 1. External Analysis……………………………………………………………...9 a. Opportunities…………………………………………………………..9 b. Threats…………………….10 c. The Competition………… d. Economic Impact e. Social-Cultural-Demographic Factors f. Political-Legal-Governmental Forces g. Environmental Influences h. Technological Changes i. Trends 2. Internal Analysis a. Strengths b. Weaknesses c. Board of Directors d. Corporate Officers
Premium Ford Motor Company Automotive industry